DC Tom

Anyone influenced by that ad deserves to be disenfranchised.

My favorite was

Yeah...I'm a nerd, a geek, a brainiac, and an egghead...and the only repercussions I've suffered from that are 1) multiple college degrees and 2) the people who called me those names I now hire to wash my car.

That was his whole answer. He looked like he was going to embellish it, but his campaign staff triggered the shock collar before he could.

It's funny that, in their effort to Trayvon the stripper, the most wholesome picture they could find screams "Arkansas slut."

Yeah, uh-huh... No, that works fine with the coastal white-collar workers, who are the only ones that count. Blue-collar workers are just going to have to learn to take orders from their betters.

I would pay real money to see one person dressed as Heath Ledger's Joker walk up and beat the stuffing out of them.

Which means the Democrats will try to own him by not giving him his day in court...which is probably exactly what he wants. Dems are playing hopscotch while Trump plays American Ninja Warrior running an ultramarathon while wrestling a bear.

Good Lord, that is a true rogue's gallery of stupid.

Electorate:

There's no such th'ing as an unnecessar'y apo'st'ro'p'h'e.

I'm the only one I know who consciously uses that as a white supremacist symbol. But even then, that's only to piss off people who deserve to be pissed off.

Did you hear her speak this morning? She doesn't deserve a speakership. They'll just give it to Robespierre Ocasio-Cortez. Quote the whole post, #######.

Of course. Fair...for Democrats. Because that's the Democrats' definition of "fairness." It's the definition they established ten years ago: "We're driving this bus. Republicans can come along for the ride, but they have to sit in back." You insist in acting like these actions exist in a vacuum...there's decades of both parties explaining exactly what they intend to do. Hell, this impeachment is nothing more than revenge for Clinton, using Newt Gingrich's tactics.

If House Democrats didn't want a partisan impeachment, they shouldn't have pursued a partisan impeachment. You're really blaming McConnell for this? Again: Democrats set the precedent, Republicans are following it, and Democrats are shocked that their precedent applies to people other than themselves.

And she has nothing to lose by that. Her party's the one sharpening the guillotines.

Not entirely true. She's trying to influence Senate procedure, which, if it came down to a court decision, she will lose heavily. But that's a matter of constitutional procedure that few would care about, much less understand. And she's not waiting for McConnell and Schumer to agree - she's waiting for rules that are fair to Democrats. She said so last night.

What's more, they can say the impeached, but the Senate didn't acquit. They can "imply guilt" on a technicality. bull####? Of course. But it's a layer of bull#### consistent with all the other bull#### Congress has pulled over the past seven years, and it's worked so far.

But the first one was better, since it quotes a number from the UNHRC that 1) was from 2015, and 2) was wrong in 2015.

Ten bucks says one of the first three replies references "Trump putting children in cages." Edit: First one. Democrats are nothing if predictable.

Jews, probably.

Oooooh...that would be the contractors the FBI used to try an end-around into the NSA programs that Adm. Rodger shut down access to, I'll bet.

Nobody except Bruce Greenwood, who was such a good President that he was President in THREE different movies.

The real question isn't "Why did you delete this?" but "Why did you post this to begin with?" The answer being: "Because inside the bubble we live in, this is not just acceptable but encouraged, and we see nothing wrong with it until people outside our bubble point this out." I mean...they do this all the time - post idiotic tweets showing their partisanship, then delete them. They never learn.

Interesting that three of the five have foreign and intelligence policy connections.