Jump to content

apuszczalowski

Community Member
  • Posts

    13,596
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by apuszczalowski

  1. I could actually see contracts adding that clause in worded that exact same way in the future
  2. I think he means that if Brown could live with Mayocks discipline and rules, how would he live with BBs that is apparently much more strict. Personally I think that many can live with BBs discipline/rule because it can usually lead to a championship. He was in Oakland for the money, NE can give him the chance to win while showing others he can play nice. Sometimes guys like him need the harder discipline to change then a place that might be more LAX like Oakland. If players see that they can run the show like it looks like there, they tend to take more advantage of it and assume they should get their way.
  3. I believe they now just voided the guarantees Just suspend him indefinitely until he decides he can play nice. Why let the baby get what he wants? Some team will be stupid enough to sign him, and he will probably end up on the Patriots playing for little and winning a title.
  4. Apparently they tried for one but on his way he changed his mind and went to the Vikings. Then they brought in 3-4 punters for tryouts this week and didn't sign them. The position seems to be something they are looking at but don't feel the available options are better. There's also the greatest punter ever available (seems like it by how he is talked about here) that the Patriots cut that's also been on the market for a while that no one has signed yet.
  5. I think the majority are saying it doesn't upset them and they wouldn't care, just that it's hypocritical that a 'racist term' (it is racist cause it's meant to be a derogatory term based on a person's skin color) is ok against someone who's white. Most blacks don't seem to have an issue with a certain word as long as it's not spoken from someone who is white....
  6. I think he has a bigger lawsuit/case against the NFL and the manufacturer of his previous helmet for the brain damage he has suffered from taking headshots.....
  7. Looks like Keenan Thompson from SNL hitting the other guy with a chair, probably a skit as the black honeymooners?
  8. I guess they would be experts on being able to determine if he did or not, they have plenty of experience in it..... Or they figure if they keep cutting guys who do it they won't have anyone left?
  9. What's he going to tell them, Josh's hands aren't as soft or gentle as Brady's were.... Beane has done this a few times, remember the WR last year from the Browns?
  10. I think he is setting himself up for a HUGE payday........... From the NFL and the company that made his favorite helmet because he has definitely suffered some major brain damage over the last few years.
  11. Something about disrespecting his couch and another about a certain drug and its effect?
  12. I think the Bears defence is still just as good (they kept Rodgers from doing anything all night). Their offence might be worse though which is surprising since it wasn't great last year.....
  13. I don't think I would be praising the Packers D so much for this game, the Bears offence was just bad.
  14. These last few throws look like they are ten yards past his intended WR.....
  15. Chicago's offence crapped the bed. GBs defence is nothing special and hasn't really had to do much. Rodgers had one good drive where they scored. This appears to be one of the wonderful week 1 crapfests as teams are still working on gelling and getting the rust off (something teams and players used to be able to do before they negotiated all these rules to protect players from practice)
  16. Wonder how many coaches are going to let their young QBs sit through the preseason next year?
  17. I would put almost as much blame onto his WRs/TEs for not being able to catch the ball or get feet down inbounds.
  18. Second one tonight at least, by a Bears WR
  19. Last year's Bears team had a defence that masked Trubiskys mediocrity and made the team seem much better then they should have been. They were similar to the Bills where the offence was carried by a really good defence, games were won by the defence
  20. I think it had to do with them not going for a FG, they finally saw someone kick a successful one earlier and got greedy wanting to see if it could be done again....
  21. But is it the defense being great or the offense being offensive? In this game, the offense just seems bad, and not because of the defense....
  22. This I think is the biggest mistake coaches make, not tailoring their systems to the players they have. You don't go 'dink & dunk' with a QB who can air it out deep and has a knock of not being horribly accurate. You start finding fast WRs who can get down field and get them the ball. Just like you don't take a weaker armed QB and put them into a 'greatest show on turf' air it out offence.
  23. How did we forget Chris on the great white WR list?????
  24. 1st, I think we may have had some front office/coaching staffs that may have thought of using OJ as a decoy..... (Might be a good offence though, imagine going out on defence and seeing OJ just standing there, maybe with some gloves and nice shoes?) 2nd, you still disrespected the great white WRs by not including Beebe and Hogan.....
×
×
  • Create New...