apuszczalowski

But its their right to own them as an American damnit! its obviously just for protection and hunting animals for food

I noticed an article about it the other day I think that said that they did not want cheering during the ceremony and were doing something about it, so I really don't feel sorry for the people that were arrested. It would be like telling someone not to touch something because its hot, and they go ahead and touch it and complain cause it burnt them.

Well if we count Liberty City, I guess I wouldn't stop, I have ran over many, many, many people there, stole a bunch of cars, even ran from the cops and been caught a few times too. Good thing I got out of there though and moved to Vice City, and then after moved to San Andreas

its a fine line/grey area. Going to a concert/sporting event, I'm going there for the event, and that is what I am paying for Going to a bar, you are going there to drink, its how they stay in buisness, you coming in and spend money to drink. Its like someone going into a Applebees with a bag of Macdonalds food

So that means I am officially a contributing member to this board? Wow, what an honor! As for the point of this thread, its your board, you can run everything the way you want. I was just expressing my opinion on the stance that only contributing members can post a link to something of theirs. I am merely stating that I believe if it is Bills related, it should be permitted because this is a Bills board where we all want to know info on the team. Although if the mods review it and deem it not tobe bills related, then they should remove it. Also anything where the person is linking to it to something that they are selling and trying to turn a profit (like a link to a Bills store the have) should only be permitted for a fee or donations to the site. But do what you want, I just asked those questions cause I figured it could clear things up if you answered them, instead of just saying because I said so, no move on

Wow Replace Mets, and put in Blue Jays and you have the same comments coming out of Jays fans mouths after every game.

I do not agree with that, if for example (just using this situation with Lynch as an example) I let my friend borrow a car of mine, he does something illegal with it and it gets impounded, and then My name gets dragged into it because he will not come forward and confess to the police, I will not stay quiet. And I do not see that as being a bad friend. If my "friend" does something like thast and drags me into that situation, are the ones that are not being a good friend. I would not put my friend in a situation like that, so I would not want my friends to do the same. I don't care what a lawyer tells me. I would not let my good name get dragged through the mud like that defending a friend who dragged me into the situation. But I guess this might make me a "Holier then Thou" poster here

Why can't you answer the questions though?

And you said he has to be at the scene of a shooting, which is not true, there doesn't have to be a shooting for him to win his bet. Its true that technically he wouldn't win yet since they are only looking to have him testify to a grand Jury and not "taking him into custody" or "Arrested"

So then what makes them a contributing member of the board? Do you have to reach a certain number of posts? Know one of the higher ups personally? If lets just say for example, (and this is completly hypothetical) Vic Carruchi joins the board and his first post is to send people a link to a !@#$ show that he will be hosting, do you tell him to stop and post other things before he is allowed to share a link? I agree that for non Bills related items, or items that the sole purpose of advertising is to turn a profit, then they should be a contributing member of the board. But for a Bills related thing like this, I don't see why it should not be permitted, but maybe send the person that submitted it a PM telling them that you will only allow it to be posted here if it is Bills related, and that you would like them to continue to be a contributing member on this board.

Although I do agree that it doesn't make Hardy a bad person because he was out late partying and may have been a passenger in a vehicle that committed a "Hit and Run", but the thing is, IF (there you go Bluefire, have at it, I'm making an assumption and using the word IF) he did get into a vehicle that was being driven by a friend/teammate that was intoxicated at the time, then it shows poor judgement/character on his part for doing that.

the key to that is that he says for any reason, and then includes or at the scene of a shooting (which doesn't mean he has to be involved or taken into custody, he could have just been hanging out with Pacman or Harrison one night, or with 50 cent and be somewhere a shooting happens) You're not going to get through to him since he only reads what he wants to read, and apparently he doesn't understand the words IF or OR

I think that incident where he spoke to the police about being treated on fairly was last year, and it was because the car was impounded, and when he went to go get it, they said he couldn't because his name wasn't on the ownership, the dealership still had their name on the ownership. As for the comment about ratting out the friend, I somewhat disagree, I wouldn't consider them a good friend if they were to do something with my vehicle and drag me into the situation where it could have a negative effect on my career and public image. If it was a situation where they came to question me because of an incident involving my friend and they only came to question me because I knew them, then I would not rat them out if I knew they really were guilty of it, unless it was a serious issue (like they killed or brutally beat someone or a robbery, etc.). But if what they did dragged me into the mess, i would definitly rat them out. I respect my friends and their property, and i expect them to do the same to me.

It all depends, Does Moulds have enough Children to field a team? I know he has a bunch, and I know Henry does I would go with Henry, because if you figure they take after their parents, Moulds kids would be WR's and Henry's kids would be RB's. Does Moulds have kids that can throw and be a decent QB? With Henry's kids, they would be running backs and would onlt need someone to hand the ball too them which is something anyone could do, but would make it a very predictable offence. But then the problem would arise that his kids would be failing drug tests and probably have problems holding on to the ball. I guess a fairer question thats still just as moronic as all the ones that keep getting posted here would be weither or not you would rather field a team of Henry's bastard kids or McGahees bastard kids

I can honestly say I don't know what i would do in that situation because I don't ever see myself being in that situation. I guess it would make me "holier then thou" though by saying that I wouldn't be out drinking and driving But according to this board, if everyone does it (like doing drugs, or underage drinking) its fine and you shouldn't get in trouble for doing it because everyone does it.

They probably should, theres a good chance he has video evidence of the incident

fixed it for you

What are you talking about Bill? Hardy has never done anything wrong, its all misunderstandings and overreactions by people like you making assumptions. How dare you try and ruin this innocent mans character by making these heinous allegations and assumptions about him having poor judgement or bad character

Who says its the second most important position on the team? And why should they spend money and resources on it, apparently they have one of the best playing it right now who is young and playing under a very affordable salary. And why should they spend all of these high draft picks on the offensive line? They just spent a huge chunk of salary to upgrade the LG spot and the RT spot, and have a pretty good young RG in Butler, one of their draft picks What more do you want from them? Draft a linemen early doesn't guarantee anything. There have been plenty of linemen that get drafted early and don't work out, Mike Williams was one of the top rated o-linemen in the draft the year he was draft and look at what happened to him. The Bills have decided to spend their draft picks heavily on the defence, probably cause theres the belief that defence wins championships and have used FA to build the offence.

Isn't it that group of guys who think its alright to touch little Boys? Oh wait, that group is called The Catholic Priests I think they are a group of people who think they are smarter then everyone

Obie is just on a crusade because, like Bill, they don't like that the Bills draft anyone that is not a linemen because you have to have a Pro Bowler (or future Pro Bowler) at every spot on the line to win in th NFL. He's mad that the Bills didn't take a LT in the 1st to back up Peters in case he goes down, cause the backups should be starting caliber too.

Its ok, they just pick and chose what parts they want to use to make a judgement about you and how you are really just a troll and hate the Bills

thats true, but I say that is more for something not Bills related or for something where they are just trying to make a profit. I don't see where the problem would be for someone advertising a radio show with Bills players/coaches current/and former

Aww, c'mon, I want to play too!

I don't really think that there is or should be a set time as to when its a good time to renegotiate except for the final year of the deal to extend the player longer. Although atleast in this case it would make more sense. He would have played more then 2 years at that position, and has played more then half of his contract Also, as for Peters, he knew their plan was to develop him as a RT and eventually work him out at LT. In the first year of this deal they had already made the switch (after the Bye week 2 years ago) so why would you agree to a long term deal if you were going to feel underpayed? Why would you not go with a 2-3 year deal knowing that they were going to start grooming you to play a more "elite" position