colin

i think they might have found something saying his knee is effed in the surgery they had.

bills physically outmatch the seachickens and win 31 16. 7 chicken points in garbage time, and 10 after the game is all but over.

if we win 2 games (first two of course) without peters, i think we'll have him on the block for a trade on the following monday.

and the craziest thing is that their back up is named locklear. HEATHER LOCKLEAR 10+ sacks for us!

chambers isn't as bad as people say he is. just like walker isn't and peters prolly isn't as good as we make him out to be. the guards they play beside (who on our team are pretty friggen good imo) and the qb/rb the block for make a diff, and marshawn is a bull and trent has a quick release. we'll have good pass protection and win the game.

he's the first overall pick. if it were more like a 7th or 10th pick it would cost us one third of that. peters has shown that he is not a buffalo guy, and will continue to show that until he shows up. i know you are in love with peters bill, but the line has been drawn. if he doesn't bend he will rot or be shipped out of town for picks. i don't think ralph would let him rot without looking into the trade option. a team like atlanta, jacksonville, or even minny with the mckinny question might spring for him.

i don't see why the bills won't trade peters. they could get 2 firsts, or a first and conditional high pick. that could land us the top tackle in the draft (or top 3 at least) and maybe the top TE as well. we could also get a walker level LT/RT. while LT is important, our guards, RT are very good and our C could be improved on. if walker stays at LT and we draft a kick ass RT, we can have a line plenty good enough.

the big deal with the lt (aside from the fact that it is the most important OL possy) is that in the nfl it is hard to find a guy to play it, more so than other positions. same thing w cb. you overpay to get a player in those positions because of scarcity, more so than because of the bottom line W/L help it gives you in most cases. while i really want JP on our team, i agree with an above poster who said he'd rather have a kick ass group of OL rather than a particular stand out one possy.

he can block and he plays hard and so on. if he gets 50 balls for 800 yards he will be well worth his cost and more. 35 for 500 and he's decent.

sucks that he went, but it sounds like he had a pretty good kick a the can when he was around! i'll tip some out.

clearly he hasn't read the posts here. we need to draft linemen with the first 3 picks every year, just like all the superbowl winners do. anyhow, i think we lead the nfl in picks and kicks for TDs this season, which could mean playoffs.

you negative nelly's are miserable fans. i think the bills are much bigger, tougher, and readier this season. playoffs, and 5-1 in the division.

Flozell Adams: 25 Million, 5 years Walter Jones: 52.5 Million, 7 years Matt Light: 27.3 Million, 6 years Jason Peters: 15 Million, 5 years How about the pro bowl reserves at OT? Ogden: 50 Million, 7 years Samuels: 46 Million, 7 years Thomas: 42.5 Million, 5 years Clifton: 32.4 Million, 6 years jesus mikey, your chubby chasing manlove has blinded you to science!!! light and adams make the same or less than peters, clifton is barely ahead, and samuels isn't all that far ahead. of course, you have to include the LT snaps bonus, but you wouldn't misrepresent the facts just to show peters that your love for him is even greater than bill in nyc (trust me, you can't love a man as much as he loves peters!), would you?

just like how under rated players (westbrook for example) who are great get called underrated until the point where they are in the hall of fame being called under rated, linemen have had a reputation of being overlooked on this board to the point where people (akc, bill in ny, etc) lose their sheet and think they are the only players on the team. peters is a stud and LT is the most important O line position, but there is much more to a team and an O than one single position and frankly losing marchawn or evans would hurt our O more than losing peters. good to have him back, but the over hype given around here for OL is way overboard.

i'd rather have jp than not, but if he won't budge and we won't pay, i'd trade him for 2 firsts. so 1 he comes back, playes great, and we pay him after another probowl season 2 we pay him now, he comes in 3 he just sits 4 we trade his ass for big picks i'd go 1,2 then 4. a certain number of games in (especially if we play well) and 4 gets more and more likely

dave, i have to disagree about the bills not trading peters. i could see him getting dealt for 2 firsts (or even a first and conditional). atl, houston, maybe even cinci could trade for him.

if peters misses more than 2 or 3 games i think the likely hood of him being traded starts to approach and then exceed 50%. if our line and O is decent in the meantime, that likely hood really really goes up. if they put him up there for 2 firsts, it could happen. atlanta would like to protect their new qb i think.

it's a good problem to have. if we want to smash mouth and run the eff out of the ball, we need fresh legs all the time. that means we need to have lots of backs who can do lots of things. it will change week to week with health and so on.

if they think chambers can start at RT and bell is a future stud, i could see our FO trading peters for 2 firsts. a top tier tight end and a stud lineman taken in the first will improve our team if our line isn't that far off without peters. as important as the oline is, it is not like the dline where you need a total stud to be the focal point, you need a squad of guys all on the same page playing with toughness and smarts. i'd rather have peters than not, but he's not the only guy on earth who can do his job.

PUT MICKEY AND BILL IN NYC ON SUICIDE WATCH!!!

imo oline is about a unit playing well together, great talent helps, but it's not like on the dl where a whirlwind rusher can just set everything off. if we can play well w or w/o peters, that is the best thing for everyone

NO, WITHOUT THE LT THE BOARD GUSHES FOR WE CAN'T EVEN GET A 1ST DOWN!! clearly there is something wrong w the broadcast.

dude you ripped off thousands of times one's natural levels, that is stands to reason that it wreaks havoc, and enough other bullchit talking points to fill a nancy reagan speach. i'm not a world renowned expert, but i'm friggen dr zielger compared the inane junk that has been spouted off in this thread. anyhow, pure garbage.

you've never done any research on the subject have you?

haha, a little humor here, COME ON!