Sig1Hunter

Anyone wearing Raiders gear gets a full blown cavity search.

AMEN brotha!

At least it's not Marv Albert again. Marv's return to football announcing was atrocious last week. He couldn't get players names right, and was often behind the play in announcing. I remember on the fumbled QB / Center exchange, he said that Fred Jackson took the hand off and fumbled it. It was almost like listening to the announcers on Joe Montana Football (who remembers that game?!) on the Sega Genesis! Horrible!

FLASH! AH-AH! Its funny, a friend of mine just yesterday was talking about that exact same thing, and made me look up the video on youtube. I promptly had the song stuck in my head all night. Now, it's back. Thanks, bro.

^this Who says crayonz doesn't have a brain?

Would have preferred a little more size on the outside with Easley, but we'll see how this works out. http://blogs.buffalobills.com/2011/09/05/jones-confirms-hes-2-wr/

I was under the belief that they didnt get #'s on the PS. Not sure why.

Caussin was cut

Wow. I guess when it comes to common sense application of the law, our legislators are lacking. In my best Gomer Pyle voice: Surprise surprise!

Can you provide anything to back this statement up? I know in Florida, this is not true.

Awesome. Just, awesome.

Did you read the article? Do you know what a "sex offender" is? The only crime that could have been committed is indecent exposure or lewd and lascivious behavior - both misdemeanors. A person branded a sex offender has been convicted of a sexually deviant crime. Having sex with an adult woman on the hood of a car is not a sexually deviant crime. Furthermore, it isn't even a crime because there was no one there to see it (except for a dog). Now, the professionalism of an officer in uniform engaging in this kind of behavior...well, he will probably lose his job over this. So, your conspiracy theories about cops sweeping it under the rug are extreme and wrong. As another poster mentioned, this guy is gonna get more punishment that you or I would get BECAUSE he is a police officer. And, this is how it should be. We expect more of them.

He was no Captain! Anyone should know that he was only an ensign...

If you look at the moron who posted the fake retweet, you'll see that is his schtick.

That's a bogus tweet...schefter imposter

If it didn't say "tank" in the title, how many hits would it get?

A couple of things, Fig, and then I am done. I am not going to change your mind, and you won't change mine. My larger point was that your assertion that "there was no evidence tying Casey to the body" is totally incorrect. There was plenty of evidence... You are looking at them singularly and trying to find doubt for each individual fact, instead of looking at the overall picture. I forgot to remind you that cadaver dogs alerted on Casey's car. Cadaver dogs do not alert on rotting food or dead animals. To say that a dead body smells like rotting potatoes or dead animals or rotting hamburger is crazy, and just shows that you haven't ever smelled a dead body before. I have. It is distinctive, and a smell that is never forgotten once you've smelled it. Now, is it reasonable to believe that the dogs, the police officers, the civilians, the doctors, and the sniffer machines are all wrong? No, of course it isn't. On to the duct tape. And, yes I am saying that it is not reasonable that the duct tape got stuck in the hair during animal activity. Again, using my common sense and knowing what I know about the basic adhesive properties of duct tape, there is no way that the tape that was used to secure the bag was then unsealed by animals and kept in whole pieces and then still retain enough adhesive after all that time and already being securely wrapped on the bag and then over itself (have you ever tried to pull duct tape apart when it sticks to itself? Does it stay in one piece?) to then stick to hair in the manner described in court. No way. The only reasonable explanation is that the tape was on the child's face while there was still flesh on her skull. Which brings us back to: why would anyone put 3 pieces of overlapping duct tape on a three year olds face if she supposedly died accidentally? Which brings us to George. Your theory is that George molested Caylee and then killed and dumped her, and this makes total sense given the evidence. Was George it George who did not report Caylee missing for 31 days? Was it George who was driving around in a car that had a dead body in it? No and no. This theory makes no sense. George was doing everything in his power to try to get Casey to tell them where Caylee was, while Casey refused. And, as far as the car being out of gas... Who backs a car into a parking spot when it is out of gas? I don't recall hearing testimony that it was out of gas, but that it is excuse Casey gave her parents when they finally found the car. Look at the BIG picture, Fig. I dare ya.

Tape wasn't stuck to the mouth? Again, I defer back to my common sense. The tape wasn't stuck to the mouth because there wasn't any skin left for it to stick to. And, it certainly was stuck to the mouth at one point because it was still stuck to her hair. Why would anyone put duct tape over the mouth of a 3 year old girl that accidentally drowned in a swimming pool? The tape was traced back to both Casey and George. They both lived in the same house. As far as the car goes, it had plenty of evidence. Who testified that the car didn't smell like human decomp? Cindy? Nope. George? Nope. Cops? Nope. Tow truck driver? Nope. Dr who is expert in human decomp? Nope. All said it smelled overwhelmingly like human decomp. Can you explain why it was ditched the way it was? The only plausible explanation that fits with everything else is that she was trying to cover up the smell of her dead daughter that was in the trunk.

Fig, I watched about the entire trial...sad to admit, but it held my attention. I came to a much different conclusion regarding the evidence than you did. To me, it was overwhelming circumstantial evidence, and through common sense the dots were easily connected. It seems to me that the jurors, and some observers, left their common sense at the door when it came to examining the evidence in this case. The duct tape is from their house The car was driven by the defendant The car was stashed in a parking lot (backed in) after supposedly running out of gas. Trash bag from boyfriends apartment in trunk, when dumpster right next to car in the parking lot where it was stashed. Car smelled of human decomp, a fact testified to by about a dozen people and confirmed by scientific methods. A mother who makes up story after story of missing child. A mother who doesn't care that her only child is known to her to be dead and lives the party life, all the while rebuffing law enforcement attempts at helping her. Duct tape placed on the mouth of the body. 1+1=2 quite easily here.

Who have they been drafting up to this point?

It's not silliness if you understand the why behind checkpoints...agencies get money from the Feds for conducting them. Checkpoints are surprisingly ineffective at removing impaired drivers from the roads. They do provide somewhat of a deterrent effect, and give the public a sense of security, but the main reason for them is the federal grants provided by NHTSA.

Trent Edwards sucks! Oh, my bad...

He sure did. He must have realized that football isn't everything and wanted to get that Stanford education. Shame on him!

So. Freaking. Hilarious. Is it wrong to watch that again, and again, and again, and again...?

Best news I've heard all day! The video showing her response to her jail sentence is classic.