Sig1Hunter

Indeed....

It's an Olde English colloquialism developed from the Latin phrase "to make fun of the village idiot"!

Just bustin' your chops. The irony amused me, that's all.

You are is contracted to "you're".

Come on, guys. BB is obviously trying to get us to pick up DG. He will then scoop up the poor schlub that we cut to make room for him. No one else sees this?

My point is that the evidence was apparently being entered by the prosecution. If it was exculpatory evidence being admitted by the defense (evidence favorable to Davis), his mother and his defense team would not object to the evidence as being obtained illegally through an unlawful search of her home. So, it is reasonable to surmise that this evidence that was excluded by the judge was evidence AGAINST Davis, and not for him. The problem with someone on the outside looking in and saying "as I see it, it should have been handled such and such way" is that you were not privy to all the info. You are only privy to the info that the media WANTS you to be privy to. The info that is beneficial to them, and not the truth of the matter. Truth, or some version of it, is decided in court. This case has been through the legal ringer and evaluated by judge after judge after judge. As they see it (which is the important part, that many Americans seem to be forgetting) Davis was guilty and worthy of the death penalty. Hey, if someone says it on a message board it must be true right? However, I believe that there is a massive historical record to prove otherwise.

How did this turn into a thread about Christianity? These things never end well... However, I will say that you have a very poor understanding of the purposes of the Old and New Testament. To say that Christianity is a "religion of death" and then cite Old Testament examples is interesting. Wouldn't it be more accurate to state that the Jewish faith is a "religion of death", since the Torah is primarily the Old Testament? Nah, it's easier to pick on Christians....

Maybe this helps: "The rendering of the sixth commandment in the King James was very unfortunate. "Thou shalt not kill" in recent versions (like the NKJV, NIV, RSV, ASB, NASB, etc.) is accurately translated "You shall not murder" (Ex. 20:13). In Hebrew, as in English, the words for "murder" and "kill" can be used interchangeably, but their different meanings are easily understood from the context. The Hebrew word for murder (ratsach, which appears in Ex. 20:13) is translated by the King James as murder/murderer 17 times, slayer/slain/slayeth 21 times, kill/killing 6 times, manslayer 2 times, and death once. The Hebrew word for kill (which appears in Ex. 13:15-harag) is translated by the King James as slay/slayer/slain 132 times, as kill 27 times, murder/murderer 3 times, destroyed once, out of hand once, and made/put/surely 3 times. The Ten Commandments forbid murder, not killing1. The chapter following the giving of the Ten Commandments has a number of commands from God to execute criminals, including: "He who strikes a man so that he dies shall surely be put to death." Ex. 21:12 "He who strikes his father or his mother shall surely be put to death." Ex. 21:15 "He who kidnaps a man... shall surely be put to death." Ex. 21:16 "He who curses his father or his mother shall surely be put to death." Ex. 21:17 "[if an unborn baby is killed] you shall give life for life." Ex. 21:23 It is not plausible to suppose that God contradicted Himself just a few sentences after delivering the Ten Commandments to Moses. Clearly God prohibited murder but insisted upon execution of murderers and others. Some Christians, however, are so influenced by the world's philosophy that they are ashamed of the Lord's own words in Exodus 21. Others talk as though God was a bad God in the Old Testament but that now in the New, He is a much nicer God, as though He has gone through a rite of passage. God forbid murder, and commanded the lawful execution of murderers." http://www.theologyonline.com/DEATH.HTML

One could argue that saying Coulter's opinion piece did not provide facts, whilst linking wikipedia is quite curious. Anyway, I bolded a statement that you quoted and wonder why you included it? When I first read your post, the context indicated to me that this evidence that was excluded was some type of evidence that might help Davis. But, upon actually going through the links themselves and reading what was actually said, it was evidence that the prosecution wanted to get in but was excluded because a judge ruled the police obtained it improperly. "In a hearing in November 1990, the judge barred forensic evidence from the shorts that had been retrieved during the police search of the Davis home. The judge ruled that Davis's mother did "not freely and voluntarily grant the police the right to search her home".[21] She had testified that police officers had threatened to break down her door unless she let them into her home. The Georgia Supreme Court upheld the exclusion of the evidence in May 1991, saying that the police should have obtained a search warrant.[25]" <---- from your same Wiki link.

Link your post, otherwise I'm gettin' a copyright! EDIT: DANG IT! :worthy:

I caught it. Apparently, he think's Oakland is in Hawai'i?

C'mon bro, stop trying to snake my credit!! http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/135209-k-gun/page__p__2253942?do=findComment&comment=2253942

I take credit where credit it due. And, it was CERTAINLY due on that little nugget...especially, if it catches on!

Doesnt he know that the Bills are the best looking?

This is the kind of garbage you get when your research for an article includes going to NFL.com and looking up team statistical rankings. #1 rushing offense, #18 passing offense, and #13 pass defense. So, according to those rankings, I'm sure he felt justified in writing what he wrote.

Marv, again? Ugh...

DC, I believe the "official" injury report is required by the league on Thursday. It may be Wednesday, but I'm pretty sure it's Thursday. Prior to that, reported injuries are usually media conjecture.

Thanks! In order to keep current, where did you learn to translate this foreign language? I am seeing it more and more. What are it's origins? The last thing that I want is to be behind the curve on this emerging trend. For instance, it may be of advantage in any future job interviews or with any prospective wife (or even her family).

Can someone translate? I only read English.

So, if the prolific 90s offense was labeled the "K-Gun" , does that make this offense the "F-Bomb"?

"Fitzpatrick live" coming up

So much for his Christian witness.....

I know. Check out the OP's link. He is teamed with Rich Gannon, doing the Cleveland game.

It was Marv. Which is why I expecting a bit more than what we got. I've always thought that Marv did a decent job announcing NBA games. This attempt was pathetic, though.

I'm sure she has tons of inner beauty. Exterior beauty? Woof.