Sig1Hunter

Strictly statistically speaking (say that 5 times fast!), if we were going to lose one more game on the way to the playoffs, then the Atlanta game was the one to do so. If the Bills can get to 8-8, it really isn't that far-fetched to get in. It's the getting to 8-8 part that's kinda far fetched... With that said, was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!

Alright, who broke the playoff machine trying to get the Bills to the Promised Land?

Thats great! Marrone definitely has a magnetic personality. He joshes with the media and his players have fun with him. Good times ahead, fellas.

How does the offense drag anything down when it racked up 470 yards? A rookie QB made a bad, predetermined throw and TJ Graham fumbled at the most inopportune time and place. Those two plays turned the game around. Alex Smith was 19 of 29 for 124 0/0 BTW.

Eball for Prez -2014! Nice post. The board is so much more enjoyable to read the day after a loss.

I'm pretty sure NoSaint was only talking about NFL Head Coaches. I dont think an argument can be made that they dont spend too much of themselves at work. But, this does nothing to belittle the stresses a prosecutor endures. In the end, the job is their choice. They know what it involves, and they know the personal risks involved. Praying for Coach Kubiak.

Yes, but he was stitched up and will be back against Pittsburgh.

Hopefully not a pulmonary embolism, but that was my first thought. Sudden onset of extreme pain, made worse by sitting up usually.

Maybe with these stellar scouting abilities, you could work for the Bills? He has played 90 minutes of pro football but you feel comfortable making such concrete, "factual" statements about what he can/cant do. I am really impressed. Come on, man. He's an undrafted rookie making his first start in the league. Do I want him as our 1st string QB? Of course not. He is what we have. He made a horrible mistake, and made several errant throws. But, lets be realistic with our expectations of him in the here and now.

What would you prefer from our 4th string QB? Tom Brady?

Wait. I'm confused. Hackett and Marrone are related?

A shame.

Maybe go for 2 after the Chandler TD? If you fail, you have a second shot at the 2 to tie it on Goodwins TD. If you get it the first time, you are in the catbird seat to win it on Goodwins TD.

This just in: Matt Flynn is the THIRD string QB. Ever heard of Valium?

Stevie got a penalty for his mock Jets celebration cuz he went to the ground during his little dance. He got the penalty for the mock Plaxico celebration because he simulated a gun / gunfire. Those are expressed no nos in the rulebook. Its not cuz the refs dont like Stevie or the Bills.

#sotrue

Celebrating over an injured player isn't taunting, but tossing the ball to a player on the other team is. Get it straight guys.

Put TJ Graham back there. Guy throws a tight spiral.

This. The no-huddle is certainly a viable weapon, but it needs to be used smartly. It shouldn't be a blanket philosophy that we run 100% of the time, regardless of the game circumstances. As has been said ad nauseum on the board, when we can't sustain drives the no-huddle does not achieve its intended goal of wearing down the D. Let the offense huddle, get their bearings, and sustain some drives. Rely on the D seize the momentum with big plays, stops, and turnovers. Then, hit em with the fast paced no-huddle.

Yeah. With all the "heys" he was shouting out there, I thought he was auditioning to be Si's brother on Duck Dynasty.

99% of the time? No. Cops are people too. We aren't perfect. I know of some who fall way below the perfection Mendoza line. My point is that there are ways of proving your innocence without making court a sham by using tricks, gimmicks, and confusion. I guess I am ranting against that side of our broken system - not you personally.

No, I'm saying its a sham because of the sleazeball attorneys and the tricks they play to take advantage of legal loopholes. Traffic court, or even criminal court, is not about finding out the truth. It's about who can pull the most tricks out of their sleeve to manipulate the system. But, hey, in the end of your story you are happy. The cop is happy (cuz he made about 125 bucks in OT pay), and the judge obviously didnt give a d@mn. Win / win / win, I suppose right? The only losers are the law abiding citizens who have to put up with repeat offenders cuz they know how to manipulate the system. Not saying you are one, because in your story you were an innocent victim of a cop who couldn't work a RADAR unit - of which I have yet to personally meet. A moderately trained monkey can work those things and be right 99% of the time.

Building a case on his memory? All he has to do is remember which car it was he clocked speeding 30 seconds before and write all the info down on the ticket. I presume he wrote the color of your car on the ticket. So, you are actually building your case on whether the officer can read? You are aware that the officer can look at the ticket, his notes, and whatever reports he generated in relation to the incident right? Contrary to what you said earlier, that is not hearsay. Hearsay would be Officer A testifying to what Officer B told him (and would probably still be allowed as a fellow officer exception to the hearsay objection). What does a passenger have to do with whether or not you were speeding? Exactly - nothing. Its irrelevant, and I am highly skeptical that the judge bought it. But, its your story so you tell it.

Sounds to me like you got busted fair and square (and know it), but decided to MAKE a sham out of the court process with sleight of hand and irrelevant questions to try to confuse the witness and judge. Those tactics are usually reserved of low-life, sleaze-ball attorneys. So, congrats on "winning". I usually find that the tact of not speeding seems to keep me out of court, though.

He's still got Wood.