Sig1Hunter

How is it a horrible argument? Players are now well aware of the risks, and they volunteer to play the game. It certainly doesn't absolve the NFL from responsibility in covering up the issue in the past, nor in continuing to take steps to try to make the game safer, but it is a 100 percent voluntary choice by the players.

He said it in a recent interview...its posted on the team site. Terry probably should let Kim do the on camera stuff.

The problem is that he couldn't wait a few minutes to get the full story, in his rush to be the first one to post. Then, he acts like a 15 year old Internet troll in his subsequent posts.

Link?

He was next to Myles Garrett when he was drafted number 1. Not sure if he's a family friend, advisor, or what.

**Edited for content** Good day, sir.

I like the way you used "forced".

Cool story.

Funny how when the government takes control of "harmless" weed dealing...taxing, regulating, etc...that the dealers and cartels that were in the business of weed dealing just don't go out of business. They move on to some other nefarious criminal enterprise. ..usually the dealing of "harmful" drugs such as heroin, cocaine, and meth. They have to fill in the income gap. One of the many unintended consequences that weren't thought through in the rush for legalization.

With the crackdown on pill mills and the like, making it harder to get the scripts for prescription opioids, addicts have returned to heroin and heroin laced wth fentynyls. Much easier to get equals much cheaper. If we legalize it, can't we tax it and regulate it? Put the cartels and drug dealers out of business?

I'm opposed to people getting high "because they can" and then effing up innocent people's lives. Eff up your own life, I don't care. I get tired of seeing the poor decisions of others destroy innocent people. Strengthen DUI laws, streamline testing procedures. ..you will have me on board. None of that is being advocated for by legalization proponents. They just want to get high, and damn everything else. It's a very a irresponsible perspective. Hiding behind medical mj just exacerbates the issue, to me.

Ah, yes. Those of us on the other side of the debate are {insert insult here}. I love it. I get it. You are more enlightened, more intelligent, more open minded. Congratulations?

So, we just keep redrawing the line under the guise of medicine and tax dollars? I have no issue with true medical mj. But, that needs to be taken in a medicinal form with medicinal strains. The fact that the recreational movement needs to conceal their true motives behind the legitimacy of medical mj is extremely bothersome to me.

Awesome! Lmao

Then call it what it is. It's not an attempt to legalize mj for medicine. It's an attempt to legalize it for recreation. BTW, the BFD is people that just wanna get high often do so at the expense of others. Why not just legalize cocaine, while we are at it? Opium? MDMA? All come from natural sources. What's the BFD?

So, legalize strains that are high in CBD and low in THC. If the medical mj movement is TRULY about medicine, do that. It's not, though. By and large, it's an excuse for people to get high.

Didn't Frankie say that too? On his way to Hollywood?

I ignore the garbage the media spews, and love reading Astro's notes. "Fair and balanced".

Thanks brutha

I can't find it on the app

Companionship? Humans were made / wired for relationship. Obviously, that varies from person to person, but I tend to think that is the primary motivator for a lot of people.

I found something I can agree with you on, EII! Good luck, John. I echo Kirby's sentiments. Be yourself. If that's not good enough, it's not worth any more time wasted. Hey, you got nothing to lose and everything to gain!

This is a joke, right? He's 25, but been a fan since 1969? I'm no math major, but...

Actually, John, it's rule number 1.

What would Shia LaBeouf do?