Gambler

Losman is NOT RESPECTED in the locker room. I am sure the players have expressed their opinions to the new coaches and management. The team doesn't believe they can win with him. Losman was Donahoe's baby. The new regime has no loyalty to Losman as a draft pick they must justify or defend. The possibility of trading Losman does not surprise me at all. The problem is that he has no tradeable value at this point. Moulds was completely frustrated by the failure of the Bills to address the QB problem and the OL problem. The frustration was seen many times in the past where Moulds was quoted as saying how disappointed he was that the Bills couldn't find a decent QB to get him the ball since Jim Kelly left the team. He often commented how nice it would have been for him to be in a situation where he could build a long term partnership with one QB (i.e. Kelly-Reed, Montana-Rice, etc.) Now that he is nearing the end of his career, he is hoping for once last chance to establish some kind of legacy for his playing career. He is convinced it won't be in Buffalo.

Hey Ralphie - whether the deal is good, bad, or indifferent - IT'S OVER!!!!! The deal is done - move on. Try being known around the league as a winner, not a whiner.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=cr-m...=yhoo&type=lgns Interesting?

Actually, the only so called "news" about Moulds has come from his "personal adviser". I haven't seen ANYTHING from ANY team indicating an interest in Moulds!!! (except the obligatory and cursory comments by Marv) The only one quoted is always his "personal adviser" who claims teams are interested. I think he is just blowing smoke. I have a feeling that teams are smart enough to know that they will eventually get him for free.

Good examples. Belichick's first year after taking over for Pete Carroll the team went 5-11. How about Dick Vermeil taking over for Rich Brooks in St. Louis. His first year they went 5-11 and the second year they went 4-12. How about the vast majority of new coaching staffs that have failed early? Have you calculated those into your "analysis"? Clearly, drawing conclusions from the rare exceptions is, as you would say, "stupid". Maybe Dick Jauron will prove to be a superior coach to Belichik and Vermeil. What makes you believe Jauron will improve the team significantly in 2006? Is it "constructive" to bury your head in the sand and ignore reality? Do you only prefer to hear only the points you agree with?

It doesn't happen more often than most remember. The two teams you cited failed to make the playoffs. (P.S. I think Miami might make the playoffs this year - Saban is a good example. Miami's organization and owner realized the error of their ways and cleaned house and spent good money to hire an up and coming talented coach vs. Ralph who is saving money on the staff payroll) Teams that are making wholesale changes in staff and personnel almost never succeed early. Previous examples of early success happened when an assistant took over for a retiring head coach or fired head coach and all the schemes remained the same, the staff remained largely intact and the team had a solid foundation. None of these factors seem to be present with the Bills. I hope that the new staff succeeds soon, but realistically 2006 looks no better than 2005. Regrettably, I fear the Bills won't really have great success until the ownership changes.

As to the first point above - it's not going to happen. Check virtually any message board and the concept "intelligent discussion" is arcane. The Bills are non-contenders if any objective analysis is applied. Emotional analysis can lead to interesting rationalizations. Wishful thinking pervades all the message boards around the league. The second point quoted above is the key point. Currently, the characteristics of a winner in the NFL are not present with the Bills. 1.) The new coaching staff is a collection of unknowns as a group. When was the last time a new coaching staff came up with a winning team in the first two years? It rarely happens. All the players have to learn new systems and schemes. 2.) The Bills need big help in the trenches. This is not the sign of a winner. 3.) The QB situation is very unsettled. And it's not like the battle is between All-Pro candidates. 4.) The Bills are having trouble attracting talent - coaching talent and player talent. I know many Bills fans don't want to hear this, but it is true. I talk football with many people from around the country and these objective people see how bad the Bills situation has become. Putting it all together, I am a Bills fan for life, but I will not let my allegiance to the Bills interfere with my objective analysis. Criticism of a bad situation is not a sign of disloyalty to the Bills, but rather it is sign of frustration that the management has not done their jobs well. Any management team deserves respect if they earn it. The jury is still out on the newest management team, but the early indications are underwhelming.

I hope Marv knows this - Posey blows!

First of all, I know the Bills are not finished with personnel moves. Here is the specific question: Up until today 3/24/2006 - are you satisfied with the changes the Bills have made? The Bills have done little IMHO to significantly upgrade the team. I can see little tangible evidence so far that the Bills have improved significantly if at all. Does anybody agree with me? If you disagree, tell me the main reasons you are so optimistic. Highlight the changes so far that will turn this 5-11 team around. I am willing to consider all reasonable arguments.

I think there is virtually no chance the Bills draft Davis.

He is an upgrade over the guy the had there last year. Good news.

Anybody in for a free lunch today? Or is all the free agent excitement winding down?

GREAT POST!!!!!!

They must have watched the films from last year.

Her mastery of the Great Deception and Lies about the need for a war on Iraq should be enough. Thousands are dead due to a bunch of pathological liars.