Jump to content

BidsJr

Community Member
  • Posts

    140
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BidsJr

  1. Wait didn't Algebra happen in 7th grade?
  2. Set yourself on fire.
  3. Here is the logic. Shady would not be happy with 5 carries and we don't need the distraction.
  4. Daniel Jones would have been a winning QB at Oklahoma, but he decided to stay at Duke instead of transferring like someone else did. (TTech and Baker) No idea if Jones will pan out, but an idiotic thing for Mayfield to say.
  5. I do not disagree with your premise, but your point about Barry Sanders is not correct. https://www.profootballhof.com/news/hall-recall-barry-sanders/
  6. In case you don't make it to the regular season... Been real.
  7. Ding ding ding! We have a winner!
  8. It has been three and my point remains. We had the #1 pass D last year and the O does not look lost. This is progress!
  9. 30 and I'm taking the under.
  10. Sorry I did not make the sarcasm obvious enough... Perhaps the O for the first time in a very long time is legit. I am shocked at how well it sounds like they are playing.
  11. For the last 20 years without exception we have heard that "the D is always ahead of the O at this time of year." ??? Or is it maybe that....???
  12. Except as stated this was 3rd down the entire practice. 52% would have led the NFL last year for some perspective. *52% conversion rate
  13. https://www.amazon.com/Pocket-Radar-Coach-Pro-Level-Training/dp/B00ISCXPJA/ref=asc_df_B00ISCXPJA/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312194571989&hvpos=1o1&hvnetw=g&hvrand=12732752145976744362&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9019609&hvtargid=pla-493575327055&psc=1 Football not listed as one of the recommended ball sports for this model.
  14. Pats keep winning so it appears as if rigged.
  15. This is why I set Allens extremely impressive sack per attempt data alongside of this. Post injury he was sacked 7 times in 181 attempts. This did not include drop backs that turned to scrambles that went for positive gain. I did not intend to do an exhaustive analysis on this, but simply to bring up a couple of points that I had not yet seen brought up.
  16. Exactly this. People have such tunnel vision on completion percentage, the whole picture is impossible for them to see. There should be some sort of scrambling metric that takes into account sacks per drop back, first downs gained, third down conversions etc etc. There is certainly efficient scrambling and bad scrambling that leads to high sack %.
  17. I'm sorry. I did not know that looking at things from a different perspective was against the rules.
  18. Scrambles should also count as drop backs and that would greatly shift this favorably in Josh's favor. No easy way to do that without watching every play.
  19. Agreed. Another way of looking at it is that he is taking a negative play via sack 1/26 attempts. He is making a positive play via Arm OR Feet about 63% of the time. Obviously these are approximations and we can argue on the minutia.
  20. The way that I am looking at it is that there is not much difference between Brady completing a 10 yard 1st down pass and Allen running for one. When it comes to his overall impact on the game. Scrambles for zero and negative yards are counted as sacks already.
  21. I am not skewing anything to fit any narrative. I was simply trying to combine Josh's impact via the running game in a way that would be more reflective while comparing him against other more traditional QB's. If you can come up with a more fair way to do it.. Have at it.
×
×
  • Create New...