Except I wasn't talking about the cases that are "he said, she said" situations (many of which I agree go unprosecuted): I was talking about this particular case. From the beginning we knew the sex was consensual and she was lying about her age. Video of her at another party and recently finding out there were witnesses at that party prove she told people she was of legal age (for obvious reasons) and her friends said she appeared to be having fun after returning from her tryst with Araiza. Speaking of the video, if you saw it, there's no way you can reasonably say that you knew she wasn't 18. So his defense is legal and valid.
The only question was whether he participated in the "gang rape," which I thought could have occurred. I felt it was highly unlikely he was involved and we recently learned that videos taken of the activities inside the house didn't show him present. And judging by her lawyer now claiming that even if he wasn't present, he's still responsible, it tells me there is proof he left the party beforehand.