daquixers_is_back

Notice the 3rd band she listed under "music I cant live without" .... wooh! the girl has taste!

Just a little update for all of those who were interested in getting Garret Wolfe. He has now (according to ESPN) gone 4 straight games without topping 100 yards. Today he had 50 some yards for 3.5 YPC.

I kinda like this one ... http://www.smbs.buffalo.edu/emed/emed/stadium.jpg Just kinda found it on a search engine.

I actually mentioned that at the end of my paragragh saying " I suppose if their werent those turnovers Pitt *may* have scored on that drive, but you never know." .... which now sounds really idiotic (im posting while watching a movie). This is true. Yet my whole point was that *I dont believe* Miami won the game themselves. I believe Chicago beat themselves.

OK fine. So then Miami is up 6, and Chicago still have two turnovers to NOT give up. One or both of them taking away points from Miami. The fact is Miami's offensive only scored about 10 points without getting the short field (10, 20, and 35 yard drives - *estimates*) is telling. Heck the Bills scored 7 on the Bears. Miami just scored 3 more (without the turnovers). And what are you talking about? Pittsburgh's 1st INT was not in their own end. So Denver didnt have an easy 7 points. Their 2nd turnover was not in their own end. So Denver didnt have an easy 7 points. Their 3rd turnover was not in their own end. So Denver didnt have an easy 7 points. Their 4th turnover was not in their own end. So Denver didnt have an easy 7 points. The last turnover was with 1 minute left and didnt really matter. I suppose if their werent those turnovers Pitt *may* have scored on that drive, but you never know. The fact was that the Bears gave 4 turnovers up in their OWN END.

I wouldnt say that in this board of Brady lovers.

Berrian ... their main WR was injured in the 1st quarter. How many turnovers did they have within the their own redzone? One was an INT in the redzone returned 20 yards for a TD. Thats 7 points. Another one was a fumble in the redzone. Another TD. Thats 14 points. So we are now down to Miami winning by 4 points with FOUR TURNOVERS TO GO! Then Grossman fumbles at his OWN 34. Thats another pretty much guaranteed points (at least a field goal). Thats 3 more points. Now were down to a 1 point lead with THREE TURNOVERS to go! Then Gage fumbles at his OWN 45 and a Miami player returned it for 30 some yards. Thats another automatic 3. So now were down to Chicago winning by 2. Ok. So with TWO TURNOVERS still left in the game, Chicago had FOUR turnovers in their own territory. TWO inside their own 20 yard line, and TWO more in their own end. Chicago beat themselves.

I dont usually bet point spreads. For the most part I bet: 1. A 4-5 bet parlay with teaser of 6-7 pts each 2. A 9 team parlay with points but will only put $5 on it 3. Pick teams straight up

No way Miami beats KC after getting a giftwrapped (6-7 turnovers) from Chicago on the road. Im also willing to put money on it.

Sure thing bro. Here are my picks Baltimore over TENN INDI over Buffalo ATLANTA over Cleveland Greenbay over MINNESOTA JACKSONVILLE over Houston Kansis City over MIAMI NEW ENGLAND over Jets Chargers over CINCI New Orleans OVER Pittsburgh Thats all Im willing to bet on. Home team is in CAPS.

HAHA ... so their were 6-7 "exceptions to the rule" in the past couple of years. That really makes sense.

Forget the signature. Lets bet money. YOU in?

You could win A LOT of money using "margin victory" of sportsinteraction.com ... picking the underdog with a high margin yields high payouts. I wish I saw that Miami game coming. No way I would have predicted that though.

Everyone uses that theory and its just stupid. Teams they beat during the regular season dont just automatically get better in the playoffs. The Colts WILL play or have ALREADY played this season any/all teams they will see after their 1st round bye in the playoffs (with the exception of Baltimore). They have played and beat New England, Jacksonville, and Denver. The only other team they have to play is Cinci. If they can beat these teams in the regular season (by a 6 point margin diff BTW), then their is no reason they cant beat them in the playoffs. They just have to be more consistant and Vinatieri has to make field goals (he missed 2 against NE which would have widened the score).

Well, I think A LOT of people lost money last week. Their were rumors of upset in the Atlanta game but I think the majority picked Atlanta (especially with a teaser). Texans covering the spread against Giants at home? A lot of people lost money on that game ... and 99% of the world lost their paycheck on the Chicago/Miami game. Not really sure I can be blamed for such a bad week. Through 8 games, Ive won some weeks and lost some weeks. Not really that much under if anything.

And that has stopped Shanahan from losing in the past to Oakland??? hmm ... NO! Im not saying Oakland is going to cover the spread or win ... Im just saying I wouldnt be suprised if the game was better (closer) than most people think.

Dude. No matter what you say, JP has 3 years of experience. Not 3 years of starting. But 3 years of experience. Phillip Rivers ... sat the bench for a while and this is his first year starting and he is putting up near pro-bowl numbers (1,750 yards, 10 TD's, 3 INT) The thread started said Peyton had a bad rookie season? Are you kidding? He had a ton of interceptions but he also had over 3,000 yards and 26 touchdowns. Thats insane! McNabb's first year starting he had over 3,300 yards, 21 touchdowns and 13 INT Daunte Culpepper first year starting he had 4,000 yards 33 TD's and 16 INT and dont give me that Randy Moss bull-crap because Moss didnt even have 1/2 of Culpeppers TD's. Tom Brady first year starting ... Superbowl Brett Favre first year starting ... pro bowl So dont give us that crap (original thread poster) about QB's not being good their first year

The only person Vick had was Algae Crumpler. THUS WHY he had to run constantly.

Id be wary of that ... Only because Oakland always seems to play Denver tough and vice versa. Its that big rival thing.

KC only getting 1 at Miami, SD against Cinci, and NE over Jets are some pretty good bets.

Thats horrible.

Wow. JP Losman rocks!

HAHA OK .. if they do I would one of the happiest people on earth that day. Out of $130 .. but still happy.

I think he means PLUS 12.5 That plan sounds great .... but here is the problem. Their is a chance that Manning and Co. will score every single possession they have the ball. They did it nearly every possesion last game, and every possession but 1 the game before. If our "run, run, run" failes EVEN ONCE, we will go down by 7, and then we score, score, score and then it fails ONE more time, we will be down by 14. Down by 14 against the Colts is basically saying "game over." The Colts run-defense is bad, but I think its good enough to stop A-Train on TWO series through an ENTIRE game (especially because he is going to be tired from your plan of "run, run, run.") Just like he knew what was going to work and not work against the Patriots (2x), Bears, Jets, and Lions?

Both of you are living in some fantasy world.