Please give me some of what you're smoking. You're posts throughout this thread are scaring me. No f'n way that: 1) the play call itself 2) JP's actual execution of the play 3) the coaches believing JP could effectively execute the play should be defended. An absolute horse s*it call in the context of what was happeneng in the game at that moment (down and distance, score, Jets timeouts remaining, momentum of running game, turnover potential of JP, etc.)