ieatcrayonz

OK I'll try that. Thanks for the tip. I don't get the whole first round thing. Aaron Maybin is a substandard NFL player drafted in the first round. King was a substandard NFL player with weak arm bones drafted in Round 5. I am a substandard NFL player who was never drafted and never played. Substandard = substandard right? I don't understand why the round matters. Anyway forget King. I was just using that as an example to see if you think of me and others as subhuman based on football opinions. I guess the answer is yes. Fine whatever. Can I ask a question about the good Jews and the bad Jews? I'm pretty sure the good Jews are the ones who worship the Star of David which is the one on the Israeli flag. The bad ones worship the iambic pentameter which is the secret devil star. Since Israel is so bad, why is the good Jew star on their flag? If you look close is one of the points really faked and it is really the iambic pentameter on there? Is it really the Star of David on there and they are just faking it and they all have the pentameters in their closets at home? Any idea?

They are good but a #1 seed does not guarantee the Stanley Cup.

I knew my mock draft was right.

Horse racing in Canada. Most places have dirt and turf racing. In Canada there is a dirt track and an ice track.

See you are making my point. I am basically expected to be an expert in everything, or be sub human. He was drafted low, cut, picked up by one team and cut again. That means in addition to the people arguing on this board, 95% or more of whom said he sucked, 30 NFL GMs had no use for him and the two who did had it for only a brief period. Isn't that a preponderance of evidence? When is enough outside opinion enough? Would I have to watch every play he was ever in, know every defense technique and analyze the 10 other defenders to make a valid analysis? Who has time for that crap? When I say 2 + 2 = 4, am I parroting because I was taught this by others? Now I have to write dissertation? Geez. I personally have never witnessed a Canadian being smart, never met anyone that can remember a Canadian doing something smart, the biggest sex symbol in their country is Celine Dion and they live in Canada and have not moved away. Again, when is enough enough? To be clear, I think it is ridiculous and unfair to call a group sub human because they are dumb. I will never do it but was just wondering your opinion on it. I didn't expect you to ask for documentation of why Canadians are dumb. I am glad I didn't say something like "Cows say Moo" because I don't feel like proving that either. Nobody wants to be dumb but there are things that are much worse. Canadians are not evil, threatening, violent, or other things like that. Sure they deserve pity but they should not be hated or called sub human. That is my opinion. I don't hate anyone. Pity is a better word. And a wife? Really? Who needs someone always trying to wear the Family's pants?

I have as much or more respect for old people than anyone, but let's face it, they are too cheap to hire a decent hit man.

This will explain it

In music class they used to teach: do re mi fa so la ti do Nowadays it goes like this: mi mi mi mi mi mi mi mi You have to change with the times.

I sort of get it, but let's say I was totally informed about W and understood all you have explained about the Jews and stuff. I still might be uninformed about the Bills, or how a box of cereal is made or how the moon stays in the air even though it is heavy. If someone asked me something I might just answer what I have heard like: "Eric King really sucked". It would really be more a reactionary move to end the conversation quickly because people annoy me. I could say: "I am no expert but smart people have told me that Eric King really sucked, I have no real opinion.". That is a lot of extra words when I am just trying to shut up some broad. Would that make me a sub human? I mean there are literally trillions of potential topics out there and I do not have the time and do not want to always sound so wishy washy. Is it only truly important topics that have the potential to make someone sub human? See that is exactly what I mean. Earlier you stated that all dumb people will inevitably parrot. Ergo, all Canadians will inevitably parrot. In this post, you see no evidence of Canadians parroting. I don't get it.

I do not totally agree here. By your standards, unless I misread them, everyone would have to be an expert in everything to avoid being sub human. For example, I might be the world's foremost expert in twine theory. That would take a lot of smarts. I would speak at symposiums and people would come to me for knowledge. At the same time, I could be a fan of the Bills but not an expert in the x's and O's. I would root for them and have opinions on all 53 players. Is it even possible to develop informed decisions on crappy 5th round cornerbacks that are now out of the league while I spend so much time on twine theory? Wouldn't I have to form opinions at least based on the opinions of others? There are only 24 hours in a day, even for the smartest and richest among us. I don't disagree here, but I still think I need clarification from you, so I will start by asking a simple clarifying question: Do you consider Canadians sub human?

So it is not strictly a smart/dumb thing? For instance some sub humans might be smart but choose to parrot out of laziness. Conversely, some extraordinarily dumb groups of people may be full human because hey don't parrot; they instead wander around aimlessly drinking beer, playing hockey, saying "eh", and never brushing their teeth. Do I have this right? Do they have to have all of the traits you list or only one to be sub human? Would a person that is not curious, and doesn't notice things but also does NOT parrot, just rambles randomly in a drunken like stupor be considered sub human?

You have referred to the Bible thumpers and other groups as sub humans. I find this interesting, not because it is offensive or arbitrarily applied, rather because you have been able to come to grips with how to apply it. I struggle with this myself. I think it is fair to call certain groups sub human. Obviously all mammals and other animals are sub human. I don't think anyone would take offense to calling child molesters sub human because universal disdain can be heaped upon them. There is nothing whatsoever redeeming about their traits. To me Bible thumpers can be annoying and do some bothersome things, but sometimes a good message works its way in there. How do you differentiate? I also get stuck with some groups that illicit more pity than disdain. I have a hard time calling them sub human. I won't name any of the back bacon eating groups for fear of being hit with a hockey puck but would appreciate your insight on the use of the term. Thanks in advance dude.

Which proves the Bills never trade down. :blink:

It is a given that Casey Matthews is the other 4th round pick. See: Every single mock on this board. I'm sure he left this out because it is obvious.

Nate Clements begs to differ. Anyway I think the Rams might really like the idea of AJ Green. They might not need to get as high as 3, but might be another partner. I think the Rams are 14. Once you move down past 8 or 9 though it might be too risky that what's left won't work out for the Bills.

OK cool.

Will there be cake?

John Beck

Holy crap we are on page two of this thread and Dexter hasn't blamed the Jews yet. PAGE TWO.

Wow. Convincing. I wonder why women/blacks/catholics/gays/illegal aliens/cross dressers/canadians/pro-life/pro-choice and other minorities don't use tactics like this.

1. The New Testament is only half of the Bible so please be more clear in the future. What did they do with the Old Testament half? How did they save it from the flames? 2. Are these police in Israel really investigating or is this going to be swept under the rug? C. Is it possible that this was just a group of volunteer firemen committing arson with whatever flammable material they could find?

Do you mean separated at birth look like or plays just like him look like?

Um dude, the Jews believe in the Bible. I suppose the Mormons burn Korans too?

See you start to tie it all together with the Saddam stuff but then you get all upset about waiting in line for Viagra again. Geez just mail order it and plan ahead a little. No pun intended.

Is that why they burn the Bibles? Part of the coverup? This is starting to make sense but I still don't get the Yugoslavia thing.