ieatcrayonz

Why do you care why he cares?

Sammy loves that stojan. Mix in a packet of silica and a gallon of water and he is set for a month.

Rabbits are different from Gerbil/Hamsters Pissing on Sammy would not be nice even though he tried to do it to me once.

I just stumbled on this I can only imagine What exactly is "tailgating Canadian style"? Do they hand out flyers on how to sneak over the border? Do they erect an igloo and make a campfire? Do they call each other up and say, "You bring the ice, I'll bring the rest of the ice."?

We don't need to do another test. As I stated, Brenda saw her oncologist today and she is ok. Why would you suggest I hurt Sammy? He explained to me what happened when he returned. It turns out that he does not have an evil twin after all. It was the silica that was doing things to him. That seems to have settled down and we are happy. There is only one gerbil/hamster in the whole estate. Interestingly, Sammy still acts angry when I call him a Hamster. He only likes to be called a gerbil. I explained AGAIN to him that they are the same thing, just like "air" and "oxygen" but he doesn't seem to get it. He is VERY smart but this one concept seems to elude him.

Kit #1, at my estate: I peed on it, Brenda went into the bathroom and peed on it it while I was making lunch for us. We ate lunch, went back to the bathroom and checked. I almost puked up my fried egg sandwich. Kits # 2,3: Same as above except in Brenda's house and no lunch. We were worried so we sat and stared at the thing the whole time for test 2 and waited just outside for test 3. As for the sex you have not made it to that chapter yet. Brenda is a bit freaky. Also, your paragraph of questions on that topic border on indiscretion. Watch it. By the way, what do you mean by "without" when discussing her left sock?

I know I wrote that so it would be easily understood but I would never call someone a "moron". I'll take your review of my post as a compliment but please don't rip on the other posters with differing opinions or those who didn't understand. And pleae don't call other people morons. Especially if you don't know the difference between your and you're. Edit: I re-read your post and it seems you're calling me a moron. Same rules apply. Re-edit: It looks like you first agreed with me, then the others. Make up your mind.

Go ahead and be an AFC homer and see if I care. I am an AFC "fan", but not a homer. There is a difference. You don't have to be so rude about it.

I don't know what happened but Brenda went to her oncologist today and she is in the clear again.

If you doofusses read the story you would discover that it was not really Tigger that did this. It was some guy dressed up like him.

As much as I'd like to thank you for your analysis and will look into the data......I am FUMING over your lack of discretion in revealing trade secrets. We have discussed this over and over. You have potential and that is hard to find. I can't give up on you completely but I can tell you that with this latest transgression you will NEVER receive a light saver. Never. What would make you post this information here? There are people all over trying to steal information from me. They follow me everywhere, including here. Take a look at the list of users on the TBD front page sometime. You'll notice that almost EVERY time I am active there is another dude called "Googlebot" also active. Do you think that is an accident? Do you?

Again, this is not about individual teams. If it were I would point out that Dallas beat up on AFC teams all year and then quickly got dumped by an NFC team in the playoffs. That does not prove my point any more than everyone's elses dicussion of individual teams proves their's.

1. I don't really know. Maybe the schedules were such that the matchups, home/away or something else favored the AFC. In any event, it is likely that the focus of the NFCs teams as a whole were on the NFC/NFC battles. It was harder to come by wins within the NFC and those wins were more important in any tie breaker scenarios. We don't really know what goes on behind locker room doors and coaching strategy but it makes sense that a team might not run their full package against a weaker AFC opponent. This way they might still win but they would not expose their strategy on film for other NFC teams to review. 2. I have said over and over that this is not about individual teams but about the conferences as a whole. I'm sorry you went to all that work listing records and such but it is still focused on individual teams. Then you go to an example of a four team league. Why? This is a 32 team league. The other guys talked about six year spans and even one 12 year span which is all meaningless in the free agency era. I'll repeat this: I am an AFC fan too. I just seem to be more objective.

I didn't check your stats but will take you at your word. You say the AFC lost at a higher rate within the AFC and that makes them tougher? Meanwhile the NFC teams were stuck in tough battles and had a better rate of winning? This makes the AFC tougher?

She is my tied for fifth cousin so she is a distant relative. I hate to break it to you, but you probably have some cousins who are gypsies.

First our cigarettes, then our fats, now this. What will the government take next? Wake up people.

Although I know nothing about this particular legislation, I do know a lot about masculinity. Your post displays a massive amount of ignorance on your part. If you develop an open mind, which would of course first involve developing a mind of any variety, please check back and I can fill you in. Until then, stop commenting on this topic. In the long run you'll be ashamed of how dumb you look.

It wasn't with Lee it was with my tied for fifth cousin Brenda. We did another yesterday and one more today and both were negative. Weird. The only difference is we did these at her place. Why would that matter?

Good work and you have a right to your opinion. I disagree and the evidence backs up my point of view. That doesn't mean it proves my point of view because as you correctly point out, it is mostly opinion. I simply find it hard to ignore the tough schedules the NFC faced.

And yet there are 14 threads a week about getting a #2 receiver. TO would clearly be a good #2 and would not cost much of a draft pick. It probably doesn't matter because we won't give up a 4th and a 6th is not enough. I like Hargrove but we basically traded for him instead of TO.

I'm talking about the conferences as a whole, not just 1 team or 2 teams or 5. Naming the top 5 teams would be a mute point.

Thanks for helping me make my point. Losses within BOTH conferences go further toward determining the overall record of the team. The NFC teams combined had more TOTAL losses. Losses to other NFC teams made up the bulk. Although AFC teams also lost more withhin the AFC they clearly did not do so at the same rate as NFC teams. All I am saying is that this is because the NFC teams were tougher. I don't think you can go strictly by W-L because of the weighted schedule and not comparing individual teams. That was the whole point before people got off on this tangent. You have to go by what you see. I see the NFC as better overall because of what I see when I watch. The results back me up too, but that is not the basis for my argument. If you disagree fine. I think probably the best we can do is to wait for the Pro Bowl as it is a cross section of the conferences. It won't tell the whole story but it will go a long way. Use this as an extreme example: I think the NHL is tougher than the AHL. I didn't check, but the combined records of the teams in the AHL might be better than the combined NHL records. I'm saying if that's true it is because of the easier competition in the AHL. Get it now?

Now we're up to 192 games but whatever. 12 years I guess. Forgetting that part, your comment in quotes is WAY off. Of NFC teams only Chicago lost more games to AFC teams than to NFC teams. Phi and NO lost equally to AFC & NFC. Every other team lost more games to NFC opposition. If you worked for Bear Stearns and reported that the market was down 120 points one day but it was mostly due to the 20 points, not the 100, you would be on the street pretty quick my friend.

and it says i'm pregnant!

That picking a 6 year period in a thread about one year is not a valid thing to do.