ieatcrayonz

That part about going blind is something your mom and dad made up. You can't really go blind doing that

Duct tape is awesome but you have to be careful. The minute you duct tape some loud-mouthed kid to a car seat Social Services is all over you like a cheap suit.

Are you seriously try to defend this Mary by saying 30 + 10 = 31.62? I have news for you. 31 is even less than 40 so your defense backfired. I don't think helium balloons will help because they will just float out of the stadium. Maybe in a dome. Although I guess floating out of the stadium is a better place than floating into the arms of defenders.

When you're at school do you derive value only from finding a final answer, or is there also value derived from your search/method?

Interesting Probable Why?

Please link where I said gay people would abuse it because I didn't and do not think they would.

Do you mean stupid and closeminded or stupid or closeminded. Big difference.

Along with people who are single and have no sexual partner at all. They might want to marry someone to receive benefits or not to be left out or seen as lesser by others. Right?

Why do the adults have to be in a loving relationship for it to be called marriage? That doesn't seem to me to meet the criteria known as this. Why can't the marriage be 100% for the receipt of government benefits, or simply a whim? How does one prove a loving relationship to a church or government? Answer: No amount of logic or reason will permit an answer, so this post will be ignored.

And still no answer from the geniuses. Why? Because there is no logic or reason behind keeping two non-sexual, non-loving couples from marriage as the geniuses have defined it.

I am confused as to why none of the geniuses on here will answer this so maybe I should clarify. By asexual I am not talking about Sage or Ed 12 minutes after his honeymoon, I am asking about two acquaitances or friends. They could be the same or different sex. What if these two just haven't met the right person yet and feel as if they never will? These two people do not love each other but they see eye to eye on many issues. They see gay and straight couples all around them getting married and receiving tax benefits, rights with regard to medical records and many other government based perks. Why can't they get married? I can see limiting it to two people but other than that why does sex and/or love or anything else come into play at all? Why should they have to say they are gay or straight or love each other to get married if they aren't or they don't? How can marriage be defined by sex at all? How can one person prove to a church or a state that they love another person? Should the government monitor couples to make sure they don't fight or they have a little fling every Friday night? How is saying only gay or straight couples can marry "well reasoned"?

I am confused as to why sex even comes into play in the argument at all. Why can't two random people get married even though they do not have sex with each other. This way they can get all the benfits of being married and be seen as equal. If marriage doesn't limit itself to heterosexuality and homosexuality should be included, why is asexuality discriminated against?

I am confused as to why sex even comes into play in the argument at all. Why can't two random people get married even though they do not have sex with each other. This way they can get all the benfits of being married and be seen as equal. If marriage doesn't limit itself to heterosexuality and homosexuality should be included, why is asexuality discriminated against?

Do you like the 1600 losers idea? Get it? 1600 Pennstlvania Avenue. 400 losers per year. 4 years. 1600 losers. I should point out that the Obama's are merely the hosts, not losers themselves. It's the guests that are the losers. People like McCain, Pelosi, Jessica Simpson, that French guy can all come one the show. Afterwards Obama and his family can make fun of them on camera.

Of course he does. He goes to an Ivy league school.

Are you saying we just should have just made a TV show about him instead of electing him President? It may not be too late. I sense a reality show that could combine the two. They could trot out 400 guests every year and call it "1600 losers". Guys like Putin would always be trying to get on TV and would probably give up a lot in negotiations. They could get people from The Real World, Survivor, Scrubs and other reality shows. That dude Puck could teach the girls about hockey. They could beat the crap out of Johnny Fairplay like everyone else and other great stuff.

Ummmm.....QB? Clean up the city boy will be gone and the Glove wearing Mary will get even Maryier if there is no competition at all.

Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton became obsolete.

He was great in it but the whole story line was a mess.

Let's just say that if there are, they are not making a good case for Franken's educational background.

There are a lot of leaves at my compound and surrouonding buffer zone that need raking. If we all pitch together we can get it done. Plus some fences need mending and one of the fields got a little overgrown. A few hammers and sickles ought to fix that right up.

Based on yesterday's revelations, I don't think it is of the "blow" variety.

Just because this is a thread partially about Trent's "arm strengh" doesn't make the whole thread a joke.

I don't care what people think about hippies. I don't really care too much if this guy takes everyone's money either. Most of mine is safely hidden in the Grant Caveman islands. I'm just laughing at this loser hippy who never earned a penny in his life bragging about how he is going to take everyone else's. When he does he'll be a loser hippy with money. Big whoop.

It wasn't onside. He is just very old and that is as far as he can kick it.