Jump to content

ieatcrayonz

Community Member
  • Posts

    8,034
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ieatcrayonz

  1. You left out the fact that they openly expressed interest in Raji as soon as it became known he is a pot head. As I mentioned in another thread, this obvious thumbing of the nose at the commissioner with respect to players on drugs, got Lynch a longer susension. The Bills actions to defy logic.
  2. I have never doubted you until now.
  3. I think that if the Bills draft a high character guy, it will not help them nor will it hurt them from Goodell's point of view. If they draft Raji, who is a now a known pot head, along with Lynch who is a known pot head, Goodell will see this as a sign from the Bills that they don't care what he thinks. It doesn't have as much to do with Raji as it does with the Bills relationship with the NFL. At some point Goodell will feel he has to stand up for himself. Hardy allegedly trying to kill his father does not help either.
  4. 200 joints per month per user? That's about 7 joints a day for 60 million people. On 7 joints a day, how in the heck are the stoners going to manage to make $1200 in income during the year to pay for their habit if they are running around all day saying "Whoooooa dude, like what if the sky was like green and the grass was like blue dude"? Will lost potential suddenly become a marketable skill? You also left out our country being overrun by sober foreigners as part of your equation. That can't be good for the economy.
  5. If the Bills draft Raji it will be: Lynch in trouble with the law about pot Last year's #2 allegedly tried to kill his father Now we draft a KNOWN pot head. Goodell will not be kind. He can say he is punishing LYnch, but it will punishment OF the Bills FOR Lyanch AND Raji.
  6. Right now it is possible that Lynch will get off pretty easy from the NFL. If he is punished before the draft he may get 1 or 2 games. This would be a slap on the wrist. If Goodell waits until after the draft we may be in trouble. With all of the reports of this pot head Raji slipping to #11, if we pick him it could hurt us with Goodell. Think about it. If you're Goodell and you see the Bills pick up another pot head after the first one was caught in the act, you would simply have to think that the Bills have no regard for rules. That is a slap in the face. It would make any person mad and Goodell would probably punish Lynch out of emotion and spite. I'm thinking 8-12 games. I hope either Lynch gets his punishment before the draft or the Bills pass on Raji. I like Fred Jackson but not as an every down back for half the season or more.
  7. Dude have you not noticed as generations go by, Californians get progressively stupider? Why do you think the entire state is drowning in red ink? Nobody produces any more and they are ill equipped to start. Between the surfer dudes, the pot heads and the even worse pot head surfer dudes, the place is devoid of a brain powered workforce. Three more generations like this and we're talking Canada south.
  8. I see the Bills needing either starters or depth at several positions. The question is whether they can be filled during the draft. The needs I see, in no particular order are: DT, DE, OT depending on Peters status, OLB, Chase Coffman, OG, S, C The order the draft should follow would be: DT, OG, Chase Coffman, DE, C, S, OLB.....the later we get the more "best player avilable" mentality should kick in. If we get a pick for Peters, that pick or higher should be used on replacing him. The draft order I think the Bills will follow: DE, Chase Coffman, DT, OG, best player....
  9. None of the pro-pothead-Raji people remember Hawthorne because their memories are shot.
  10. Dude you haven't been reading this thread. Smoking pot makes great football players. I was with you but after reading these three pages I have been convinced. I just hope a 2nd round Center and Third round TE bring their bongs to rookie camp.
  11. You guys have me convinced. Do you know any pot heads we could draft in rounds 2-7 and seal our fate as Super Bowl Champs? This seems to be a good strategy.
  12. Aliens?
  13. Why would you assume that if pot makes you a loser, it must mean alcohol makes you a winner?
  14. That would be great if pot weren't such a de-motivating drug. He would not be able to commit to the NFL level of football if he is committed to pot. It is fine in college where he can cruise but as soon as the going gets tough, the loser mentality will kick in and he will be useless. If he can't resist pot long enough to test negative at the combine he with definitely smoke while playing. It will kill his short term memory and he will be useless trying to know the plays. I'd rather have him be useless for another team.
  15. Smoking weed is a habit of losers. If we want a loser on our team we should take him. Otherwise, we pass.
  16. Dude it was definitely the Michelin man but Ghostbusters is correct. Isn't "Campfire" the dominant brand of marshmallows? I have never even heard of StayPuft.
  17. It's a tough one so I'll give a hint. The person who said it was on a rooftop with a futuristic gun: "Yup.......It's the Michelin Man"
  18. It made me wonder too. It made me wonder if you post under two IDs.
  19. That quote is from Fox News so forget about it. The guns come from China? That makes no sense as China has a lot of gun control.
  20. Canadian Bacon?
  21. I forget the exact title but it's something abut the Ya-Ya sisters, right?
  22. It looks like there is another movie about Canadians coming out soon. It is called Anvil and I think it is a re-make of an old movie called Spinal Fusion. It is pretty much the same thing except the guys in the band are even dumber because they are Canadian. It doesn't look very original but it does look funny.
  23. To be clear, I think that if Peters is retained that there is a chance we do not draft OL in the top 3. My guess is that we would, but we might not. I would agree with you that this omission would be a mistake. If Peters is in fact traded, I am almost certain we would spend at least one very high pick on OL.
  24. We have way too many needs to give up Trent Edwards and a 1st round pick and more for Cutler. I think it is true that Cutler is more proven than Edwards, but Edwards is a guy you can win with too. The 11th pick along with him for a guy everyone knows will be gone from Denver? I have to think Denver would jump at that and rightfully so.
×
×
  • Create New...