ieatcrayonz

I left the last word blank because it is a curse. If you figure it out and fill it in, then it is a haiku.

When Monday finally comes to pass The Bills invade the artificial grass and try to kick the Patiots* ___

Good one

Looks like Triangulum is feeling the strain.

The Bills signed and cut a NE TE named Dievendorf last week.

Dude, the guy is dumb but not Canadian level dumb. He would never go there. Plus, he dresses too well to be Canadian.

Dude, I can see how you would want Libya bombed but weren't you against Iraq and Afghanistan being bombed after 9/11? That's not very consistent.

Take the "build a wall" talk to an immigration thread. Yes we should have walls in place but even with them, people would be able to come and go. They would just do it legally. Wall or no wall and as stupid as Moore appears to be, he'd have to be a whole other level of stupid to move to Canada.

Didn't the Bears defense score about 23 touchdowns that year? Did Crowton draw up those plays too?

Dude I stopped reading right there. Thousands and thousands of people change their hair color every day. Do you really believe Ronald Reagan had black hair into his 80s?

Is he a senior? If so, what is the ruling? Can he go to the NFL right away? He may be a good pick up and probably wouldn't come up with all sorts of excuses to avoid practice like JAIrus Byrd.

No laughing in the Bills locker room for the nxt 6 weeks fter this move.

I bet there is no laughing in those locker rooms.

It's wonderful that some people have been able to influence Ohio law but it does not change the FACT that physics and logic dictate bicyclists should stay off main roads, spandex or no spandex. That is the point of my original post. As citizens, it is our responsibility to demonstrate this until lawmakers see the logic. I realize it may take a while. Bicyles simply do not belong on main roads unless their operators realize they are secondary to the use of the road and defer to cars. It is for their own good as wwll as society's.

If you look at the post it says "with permission" meaning the Bills have given their blessing. If TO and Dallas reach a contract agreement, the Bills would make the trade. This may not happen as it turns out Williams is not as hurt as originally thought.

I'm not Canadian and my level of respect for you remains unchanged.

If you are in a capitalist society, a dictatorship, a communist society or a socialist society, the law of supply and demand always prevails. Can you think of any commodity that would have a lower inherent demand than the demand for the sperm of a Canadian? Seriously.

With Roy Williams being hurt it is possible TO is in Big D to negotiate a contract to go back to the Cowboys. Of course he would need the Bills permission and they may have seen enough in pre-season already to know having TO for 1 year would be fun, but with our other issues getting two #1 picks for him would be better in the long run. We'll see.

You shouldn't be off in a pea patch but you should be on a road more apprpriate for bikes. You know, one without a lot of auto traffic.

When we were kids of 8 to 12, and we were riding along a "main" road, we knew where cars were at all times. If a car was approaching us as we approach an intersection, we either sped up or slowed down depending on the positioning of the car. We did it as soon as we saw the car. We never just kept going along at the same speed assuming the car would adjust to us. The "main" road was considered to be for cars, at least by us. I guess we assumed that because the width of the lanes was suspiciously well matched to the width of a car. The non-spandexed kids I see riding on the road still behave in this manner. Add a few years and a little spandex and you suddenly have people that continue to travel at the same speed regardless of the car situation. They know the car is there, they know some drivers will need to turn right, but they don't want to disrupt getting their personal best time I suppose. Using a 40 MPH road responsibly involves going more than 15 MPH, not having six bikes side to side blocking a lane and being aware of your surroundings. If you are not going a sufficient speed, responsibility involves deferring to people using the road for its constructed purpose and/or using different roads that are more suited for bicyclng purposes. Perhaps legally? A complete idiot that I could not possibly have seen runs into me while I'm behaving properly and perhaps the law is on my side? Are there any laws cyclists need to follow? Are they required to stop at a red light behind the last car in line? The lightning itself is "an act of God". Getting a bike out of a garage and riding it while a thunderstorm is approaching is "an act of an idiot". Given the stuff these people do on sunny days though, it isn't surprising.

Amazingly, in some ways they are even dumber if you can imagine that level of dumb.

Common sense would dictate stopping the bike before running into the side of a car. It is this kind of bicycling mentality that has our country reeling. Me me me. I can't go on a road that is less traveled. I can't just go out and have some fun, I have to dress up like a dork and show off for God knows who. I can't be on equal terms with a car even though if there were no cars there would be no road. I have to be a superior bicyclist. I can't stop just because there is a car in front of me. I will sue everyone to protect my spandex. Give me a break. It's a road. follow the rules. If there were a car I had passed a safe distance back and I went to take a right and the car came up on the inside of me and hit me, THAT driver would be in trouble. But a bike dude who is even more stupid gets a free pass and I'm in trouble? Let's try this one: I'm in a long line of cars stopped at a light. I am first in line. I want to take a right and right on reds are allowed. I begin my right safely but did not notice that spandex boy was riding along the shoulder quickly passing the cars stopped in line. He also wants to take a right but does not want to act like a civilized human and wait in line. Naturally his right is wider than mine because he is going faster. He sideswipes me before I was even able to see him because my view was blocked my the other cars. He flies 14 feet in the air and rips his shirt on the asphalt. I suppose because I'm in a car it was my fault right? How about this one: A spandex clad moron is riding along the road on a metal bike in a thunderstorm. He is struck by lightning. I suppose this one is God's fault or maybe the weatherman who had predicted the storm would start 30 minutes later?

So you're saying if a car is going down a 40MPH road at 40 and passes cyclists going 15, he should wait at the intersection until the spandex clad mob passes him on the inside? Or should he slow down to 15 every time he sees a bike? Or should he just buy some spandex and a bike and ditch the car? If the car is ahead of the bike, or another car, its driver has the right of way to turn it and should turn. If the biker runs into him, the biker should be ticketed and pay for the damages to the auto. If enough people turn, then idiot bicyclists will learn to actually follow the rules.

Why didn't you look up the law for operating a bicycle? Plus in the scenario I painted, I would not be colliding with the person propelling a human powered vehicle, they would be colliding with me. I am not saying cars get to ignore rules. I am saying that bicyclists shouldn't either.

Any person who rides around in spandex ignoring rules should be made to pay attention to the rules. If that is via hitting them, so be it. Their looks do not matter. I would have thought by now you'd have learned that women like this, pretty or not, should be avoided in your personal life. Life has enough headaches without having a pushy broad around all the time. It is off topic for this thread, but if you want some attention from a woman like that, you are better off hitting her than following her. She can just pedal away if you are not willing to hit her. If you are, she may hurt her head and become delusional which could give you a shot