shrader

It's obviously not up to the standards of GTA since you're always on foot (or in the air), but it's definitely a huge map for those purposes. And Mark Hamill voicing the Joker is always worth the price of admission all by itself. There was always something hilarious about riding your horse through the woods in RDR and then suddenly being pulled off of it by a cougar or bear. I enjoyed RDR quite a bit, but at the same time, I haven't yet found myself going back to play it a second time.

Why did it ever go away? They're off to such a great start.

I'm curious about Tower Heist for no reason other than seeing Eddie Murphy go back to his roots. And then there's the Muppets. I'll have to check that out at some point. Thanks to that one, I'll probably be bombarding my brother with youtube links to Kermit's Rainbow Connection.

If you like free roam and Batman, I'd highly recommend Batman Arkham City (the first game was great too). There's something incredibly entertaining about sneaking around as Batman and then taking out and entire gang of 15+ thugs.

And you know that receipt check is coming so why even put it away in the first place?

I wonder if any place has created a system yet where any purchased goods are immediately brought to the door either by an employee or some sort of machine. You can't claim your goods until you show your receipt. That would essentially end this issue. It's probably not practical from a money point of view and of course someone would complain about something, so obviously it will never happen.

Amen to that. Just keep the damn receipt in your hand the second the cashier hands it to you. You end up being delayed by about 5 seconds at the door. Guess what, you would wind up spending those same 5 seconds waiting to turn out of the parking lot anyway.

I had a guy lay on his horn a couple weeks ago when I pulled over because a cop was coming the other direction with his siren on. Even better, about 20 yards in front of me was a red light.

And then they all stop there.

I used to call a lunch lady at my school Beaker. She had to have been a member of that family too. The funniest part is that she had no clue why I called her that.

Jenner was before my time, so I guess that's why the lawyer thing was all I'd ever pick up on. I am kind of surprised I picked up on that one immediately though since only Cochran ever got any attention from that trial.

I could vote for any of Animal, the Swedish Chef, or Statler&Waldorf. But since they're a combo deal and not a singular muppet, I might just have to stick with either of the first two.

My thoughts exactly. That was the first thing I noticed.

Only if both teams claim the same player off of waivers. So wait. If they are no longer tied once they apply the tie breakers, that means the tie breakers were never applied in the first place... which means they're still tied and need to use the tie breakers... So when does Kyle Reese come into play?

Does that family have any claim to fame other than their father getting OJ off for murder? That's the only significant moment I've ever heard that name attached to.

So did he actually wear this anywhere near Gailey? That's what I would really want to see.

I know he's making a ton of money too, but the sports world needs more Jared Weavers.

I've never seen/heard someone go on a show and try to put on a show for the sake of entertainment. Nope, people never do that.

Stuart got a very loud reaction from me. As for the show, what a great return. If it wasn't for the slight twist to their mocking of videos, I never could have told you that it wasn't a part of their original run. And on that note, their take on the Jersey Shore was absolutely hilarious.

I say they void out one of their losses. It's only fair. The ones who lose out the most are obviously the girls. I can safely guess that not a single one of them was even aware of this rule. They're handed a schedule and they play it. I just wonder how something this could get past the administrators and even the league itself. No one caught this back in August/September and said "hey, you guys should probably remove one game from your schedule"?

It seems kind of dirty that some agent is using her to land clients. Then again, apparently it's working, which says a lot about many of the players out there. I don't care one way or the other, but are these guys really dumb enough to base their decision on that?

I was going to guess lots of plaid.

Do they all have the same number of games though? It always seems like different schools schedule differently. Any seeding would be done by games within the conference/division/whatever they have, but then the teams usually have a couple games outside of that. Then again, I went to a private high school so things may have been different.

Absolutely, rules are rules. By my god that's a whole bunch of stupidity involved on both sides.

It does sound like a really stupid reason to be banned from the post season. When I first started reading I was expecting something good like drug use or an abusive coach. Instead I get "they played one too many games". What a joke.