Spiderweb

Ah, will it be true......

1st Year - 697 2nd Year - 488 (injury shortened season) 3rd Year - 742 Yet the owner of these stats turned out to be one of games best, an HOF'er. It might still be a bit early to write McGahee off just yet. We haven't seen what he's capable of with a line that can actually move and block.

...and that "assumes" someone will be there willing to make a trade for our pick. We drafted 4th afew years back and it's been said that when we went on the clock, no one called. 9th is actually a bit safer and possibly more able to be dealt.

Based on what? His mini camp? Sorry, but he's a complete unknown at this level and at this time. With our line, who ever it is, he'll need to be able to block.

Yes, around 3-4 years ago. Jon, is getting a tad long in the tooth.

May be so, but there was a lot of similarity with the Bills of 04 and Mi Yami of 05. Strong finish, 9-7 record when they were counted out for dead early in the year. What was bad is that we blew a 21 point 4th quarter lead to them. That was $!@&%!

To me, Denney was more effective than Kelsay, and Denny can also play special teams. Solid backup with ST ability. Kelsay on the other hand, was a huge dissapointment. Huge. Adams could again be effective with the right tackle (two gapper) next to him, but his age and Buffalo's ability (or lack thereof) in replacing Pat Williams sealed the deal, before Adams's disagreements with Gray & Mularkey.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.....technically Holcomb started the KC game that we won, but other than retreating to the bench and mumbling "I'm Batman", for the rest of the game (in which we trailed when he left), he did nothing to deserve ANY credit for that win. Christ, even that other national pastime would give the win to the reliever....just not you. Holcomb was till a loser, period, and one without the youth excuse, etc. He's a loser the old fashioned way, he sucks.

He definitely played like a backup (and an average one at best) today. I would have had more respect for him had he come out and said "I stunk it up today" after the game, but no, it was all about the breaks...etc. Hoepfully, this will be a lasting impression on anyone left with the Bills (after the "shakeup") so he won't be considered a solid choice as a starter next year. Give JP every opportunity to win the job. At least whoever the brass is, there won't be any false sense of security concerning Holcomb's ability as a starter.

But notice, he didn't say he was going to sit down with TD.....

Trade down...yeah, but only for a decent 2nd in addition to a lower 1st. And then I'm still not comfortable. #8-10 seems about right where we need to be. TD should be gone so his antics shouldn't be part of the process this year (hopefully)....

So does your avatar....wow

Rivers did nothing today in a meaningless game against a disinterested opponent. His trade value is based on his previous salary (two years ago) and his time in the league versus what a Top 5 (Leinhart) will command in new 2006 $$. A shoulder separation (degree not reported) certainly has some impact on Brees but if it is limited - S.D. would be foolish (IMHO) to cast their dice with Rivers. The Chargers played the worst NFL schedule - yet posted the best record against the best of the rest. I blame Marty ! 546491[/snapback] Marty was born to be a bridesmaid.....Has consistently coached teams to decent seasons, but never can get over the hump. It's been the same whether it was when he was the HC of the Browns, Chiefs, and now the Chargers. Don't ask about his playoff record.....much worse...... Must have the tightest collar in the NFL. Besides, never liked old Marty too much and he was a horrible LB for the Bills back in the day as well. One thing he doesn't suffer from is a lack of ego.

Prior to the Pats game, I'd have to disagree. JP did show improvement beginning with his KC game. What bothered me about him was that he wasn't consistent. Start hot, cool off and go into a shell. Much was the play calling, but JP never did anything to rid me of that nagging feeling. A 60 minute game? No, he hasn't to date, but now lately it's been even tougher for him to reach this point sitting on the bench.

"The grassy Knoll", "Military Industrial Complex", "The Mob", and the conspiracies roll on, and on, and on...... When Beldsoe was jetisoned and Losman annoited the starter, Holcomb was still with the Browns. Then we went looking for a vet backup and Holcomb fell into our lap after he had had enough with the Browns. Our two "miracle" workers (Wyche and McNally) couldn't transform a kid (JP) into a game savvy starter overnight and our offensive line from a lump of coal into a diamond. Moulds wouldn't support the newbie QB while he learned the game (NFL style), and Fletcher goes on record as saying the defense played well enough to win against Carolina even though they allowed the game winning score late in the 4th quarter, which followed a poor defensive finish against the Pats, and shortly thereafter the defense completely collapsed against the Dolphins. One constant there, 4th quarter come from the lead losses. Sorry London, our defense has been a major problem, all year long save the season opener. No, there's no conspiracy, just a HC and upper management that has caved into the vets, while they may still be able to play (although not up to their earlier years level), do not represent the future for the Bills. Start Holcomb now to save their jobs? Likely, but it shouldn't matter. MM lost control over this team. That alone should cost him his job. Yet we made an example of Sam Adams who refused to play a two gap run stuffing style. Our best DT, but MM showed him who's boss.......yeah right..... Just a couple of Laurel & Hardy clones running the show.

The running game has gone south and maybe you hit on part of the problem. Villerial's absences and poor play when he's been in there haven't helped either. Nor has Anderson been of any value at all. He's simply just another Jamie Nails... Many young tackles stuggle a bit in the pass blocking, but Peters has done reasonably well in this area, yet to me, his blocking does seem to be lacking at this point, but I'm sure someone out there will disagree with us.

Here's one correlation that tends to prove the opposite though.....Cincinnati Bengals (15 years with losing records). This year has gone well for them yet, there were 15 years of high picks before Lewis could get them to play (that and good group of players on offense). I too feel more comfortable with the 7-12 or maybe 15 range. Far less costly. Look what Mike Williams has given the Bills. Cap issues.....

Can't say that I disagree with much (if anything) above. In Cleveland, there was a lot of internal pressure in that organization to give every opportunity to Couch to succeed. yet, when Kelly was finally given his chance, and despite a couple notable performances, he fell flat and lost the starting role. Holcomb is a solid backup, with an accurate but rag arm. As for decision making, he seems to read defenses better for sure, but those 3 yards dumpoffs on 3 and long infuriate me. Sure, once in awhile thatis the prudent thing to do, but he does it far too often for my tastes. I too cannot forget the 4th and 7 play for 2 yards against NE. That ranks right up there with our beloved former QB Drew who once threw the ball away on a 4th down play that sealed another loss under his wonderous reign. Kelly is a backup, a caretaker, and could be a teacher, but he's not a great starter. With the season having gone down the tubes, and with JP showing improvement up until the NE debacle (2nd NE contest), JP should have been getting the starts. If he ends up not cutting the mustard, so be it, but he needs the opportunity to play for us to find out. Kelly starting is simply a case of spinning our wheels.

My thoughts exactly. IIRC he was touted as the next Bruce Smith when he came out. I guess those are big shoes to fill, but he hasn't even resembled the rookie Bruce Smith who was a fat, out of shape blob (that quickly changed the next year).....

While I like Moulds, I think there's far more to it than "he's just turning it on", or that Moulds has been open all year and Holcomb is able to hit him (whereas JP cannot). A majority of the catches Moulds has had of any value (those crossing routes 15 yards downfield) the past two games were mainly against zone coverages. I've notice far less man up with help over the top on him. I believe teams have taken note that Evans is now the deep threat on the Bills, which isn't to say Moulds isn't respected anymore, but definitely not like he was once was. In fact, against Denver, Champ Bailey had Evans at least as much as he did Moulds, from what I can recall. To me, it was the combinations of zone coverages, Evans being a bigger homerun threat now, and I'll give Holcomb some due in that at this point, he does recognize coverages better than JP does. I guess we could add that it was Moulds who was calling for Holcomb early on and that probably still rolls around inside JP's head too. All in all, if teams are beginning to shift double coverage from Moulds, he'll continue to perform as a veteran receiver, he must love going against zones without the double coverage. He's still too good for teams let him run free. He's shown that the past two weeks.

All I can add is that I'm very happy with the Bills getting a contract extension done with McGee. To see him play healthy (or as healthy as he has been of late) was a very nice sight to behold. On Chad Johnson's long run for a TD, I saw good old Nate trailing in his dust. Chad had also beaten Nate soundly on the long pass that Vincent picked off. Right after that pick, I mentioned to my wife that had Palmer not put so much air under that throw, the Bengals would have had 6. Vincent would not have gotten there in time, but Vincent did make a nice pick none the less. Today, the moniker "Playmaker" transfered officially to McGee and Nate's new (and more appropriate) moniker is "Toast". Nate hasn't even played like a top 20 CB this year. I wonder how close attention the rest of league has paid to Nate this year. If they have, his big contract should have evaporated completely after the Miami game. Today's dismal performance by Nate was just more of the same.

That's as in both guards. Villerial looks shot to me. I watched him get knocked around quite a bit today and in those goal lines situations, when push is paramount, he consistently got knocked backwards, or so it seemed to me.

Great, then we can get the "other" hair guy....Jimmy Johnson and we'll have the market cornered on lacquer heads..... Maybe they can teach the players how to properly build a "hair" helmet (once most of them grow some hair), and we can cut back on our equipment costs....

Now how is that going to feed those conspiracy theorists?

Hummmmmmmm.............