DrDawkinstein

One of Baldy's Breakdown tweets showed that adjustment. We basically moved from playing a 4 man front to a 5 man front. Took away a couple of gaps. Shut them down. Great job by our coaches.

All this tells me is the anti-Democracy sedition is not contained to just "crazy trumpers" and is actually the current standing of the entire Republican party.

The Republicans are alleging fraud in areas where Dominion election machines were used, like Arizona and Georgia. Arizona and Georgia both performed audits of their machines, and everything came back clean. The election results in Georgia and Arizona also, coincidentally, were damn near exact matches to all of the polls that were released, showing Biden with a narrow lead, and ALSO matched the senate races, again, almost exactly. Multiple races in multiple states, all dead nuts accurate. All of the investigations also revealed that Dominion isn't owned or operated by the Democrats (or Hugo Chavez). But Dominion isn't the only election machine manufacturer. They aren't even the biggest. That distinction goes to ES&S. ES&S has had a littany of issues over the years, and their former CEO quit to run for congress in a state that using his machines. He went from polling way down before the race, to winning by 17%. Gee, where have we seen that before? Maybe Maine, where Susan Collins spent the entire last year losing in every poll, by about 8-10%. She won her race by 9%. Roughly a 17% flip. Who's machines handle all of the ballots in Maine, including the mail in? ES&S. And since the race is soooo far apart, there will never be an audit of the equipment. But it's just like, one race, right? No. Of course not. This year, South Carolina spent $51 million on new ES&S equipment. Lindsay Graham went from polling down 1-2%, to winning by 10%. In Iowa, Jodi Ernst went from polling down around 3 points in nearly every poll, to winning by 6.5%. Just shy of a ten point swing. In Montana, Daines was within a few points, generally even, with his competitor Bullock. Daines won his race 55-45, another magical 10 point swing for the Republicans. Every senate race, where ES&S machines were used, we had crazy swings like this, and the results of every ES&S senate race went for the Republicans by so much, that no recount or audit will ever be performed. Back in Georgia, in the 2018 gubernatorial race, there was quite a bit of tom*****ery too. Kemp "won" a pretty disputed race against the Democrat Stacey Abrams. Part of the issues revolving around the race, were that not only was Kemp overseeing his own election, but he had ties to the company who's equipment they were using. ES&S. The equipment ended up not having any paper back ups, and the results were all erased, so no audit. Oops. For this election, they went with Dominion, after Democrats blocked attempts to purchase more ES&S equipment. It's not like any of this is a huge secret. ES&S has been getting eyeballed since their tom*****ery in Florida, during the 2000 race. They weren't the hanging chads, they were the ones that "mistakenly" gave Bush a bunch of votes in a county, allowing him to call himself the winner, helping to justify his pushes in court. Disturbing revelations have been surfacing about ES&S for a while now. Stuff like selling machines that have remote access enabled, allowing anyone from anywhere to access the devices and alter data and configurations as they see fit. But we will NEVER hear a Republican say they want those machines looked at closely. The information is out there, readily available, but Dems are lousy at going on the offensive

Absolutely, yes. But I know it would never happen.

Great catch, OP Does Diggs count as a 1st rounder now that he's on the Bills with that trade?

Now I just need to clear an hour in my day so I can watch it!

Thanks, been waiting all week for this. Deserves its own thread, imo.

I'll play. Specifically which liberties protected by our constitution do the liberal democratic base "hate"?

I mean, as pretty much a Social Democrat (or Democratic Socialist) myself... how dare you? How do I even respond to that? Why would you assume that I, and plenty of other Americans, "hate the individual liberties protected by our constitution"? I'm guessing because some youtube video told you that. Gov. James Cox who ran for President in 1920 with FDR as his VP, and who started what is now Cox Enterprises, a $20Billion annual revenue company, was a Social Democrat. He didnt "hate liberties protected by the constitution", nor did he hate capiltalism (as evidenced by his wildly successful companies). FDR was not against our constitution either. His New Deal simply helped provide Americans with a safety net because we can afford it, and the more people we protect from poverty, the better our entire country does. Neither is Bernie, or AOC, or anyone else the propaganda wants you to believe is a boogeyman. They were/are all for making sure that as our country grew and progressed, so would the Quality of Life for our citizens. NO ONE in our government is Socialist. Social Democrat (or Democratic Socialist) does not equal Socialism, just because they both have "social" in their name. You need to do some basic research and even simply Google the definition of Socialism before talking like that. If you did, you would see it is obvious no one is arguing for "the means of production to be owned by the people". Rather, Social Democrats are simply in favor of making sure our taxes actually buy/provide us things we need instead of being wasted on tanks we dont need or hoarded by the 1%. We are already paying for things, we just want what we are paying for. If we truly are the richest country in the world, we should be able to provide the basics to our citizens as a safety net considering almost every other developed western country does it without issue. China is a tough one. Like Russia, and North Korea, and even the Nazis, they call themselves one thing that sounds good to their people, but in reality act a different way. Plus, we dont have any trustworthy information on what they do or how they do it. It seems to be far more Authoritarian Communism than Socialism. And certainly not Democratic Socialism since they do not have a Democracy. edit: I'd also like to add that nowhere in the US Constitution, Declaration of Independence, nor any of our founding documents is capitalism even identified. Nor any other theory of economics. So arguing that social programs, or even outright Socialism is against our Constitution, is wrong. As is arguing that pure Capitalism is our decreed method.

Good news towards getting rid of divisive misinformation, bad news for @JaCrispy's thread starting momentum...( ) https://www.cnet.com/news/youtube-will-remove-any-new-videos-alleging-trump-lost-election-because-of-fraud/ YouTube will remove any new videos alleging Trump lost election because of fraud YouTube will remove any new videos alleging that President Donald Trump lost the US 2020 election to Joseph Biden because of fraud or errors, Google's massive video site said Wednesday on its YouTube blog. Essentially, YouTube now categorizes Biden's victory and Trump's loss as historical fact, and so it will crack down on new misleading videos alleging otherwise.

Dislike, but as long as we keep winning in them I wont complain too much.

Absolutely incorrect with those labels. Russia hasnt been socialist/communist in decades. It is now rampant late stage Capitalist with just a few wealthy oligarchs controlling it. Cmon man. Dont be so easily duped by how they want or choose to label themselves. Or, even worse, how youtubers label them.

Agreed here.

We wouldnt know about that here with all our patient, well balanced fans. 😐

There is a whole thread with all their player quotes about it. Because we are that good. The old Packers teams used to get to the line and tell the Defense "We're running a sweep right" and then pound it on them for 10 yards.

Isnt it amazing to see Buddy Nix's 12 year plan come to fruition?

I had heard for years that the problem with the Bills receivers was they couldnt get open because they "couldnt create space". I kinda understood in theory what that meant, but always thought "how much difference can there be? it must be the play design that is bad". But then I watch Beasley and especially Diggs work, and I'm like Ooohhhhh, THAT's what they mean.

Not a good look when your Franchise QB is being compared to a moody, coked-out pop star. That said, in my own opinion... I've noticed the same thing Bart Scott has. There have been a couple of post game interviews after losses where I noticed a few red flags. Trying to dig up the videos. But it's there. Folks arent just making this up to hate on this kid. Might not be a huge problem, but he doesnt seem to have the same charisma that makes the entire team want to rally around him like Josh does.

It's been grinding my gears that NONE of the shows that played that highlight have mentioned Diggs selfless team playing there. Should be an easy talking point for them.

"It's not the size, it's how you use it!"

All good, man. I was just making a joke.

This is good stuff. Unpolished, but raw and honest. Good inside info. Like what he said about "As Josh has grown, so has Daboll".

We used to call this "Horny Pony Syndrome" back in high school Lacrosse. One of our best players would come out way too amped up, and coach one time said he looked like a horny pony. He'd take a couple of good hits and then settle in and score 5-10 goals.

New conspiracy theory: McD is saying they "benched" Moss in order to hide his head injury and keep him out of protocol.