Scraps

So you are fine with removing the rights of women, as I originally said.

That is not a stand based on any value. That is a weasel way to avoid the topic. No surprise Trump took that stand but what is your excuse.

So what is your position? If you think there are to many abortions, how would you limit them? "Leave it to the states" is a cop out.

Meh. You won't take a stand based on your values. Why not?

ChiGoose posted some revised statistics. So your solution is to ban abortions?

How do you separate the two?

Doesn't it? What if the woman has a hard time with pregnancy and is told her life would be in danger if she carried to term? If it is her second such pregnancy does the doctor say "Sorry, only one per customer"? Are multiple medication abortions in the first trimester as hard on the woman's body as an equal number of pregnancies carried to term? I think the issue is far more complicated than many pro lifers believe.

Cleveland.

So what's your point? I'm not telling any woman what she can or can not do. No law I support will result in women being unable to get the care they need in and ER.

Meh. If that government had the support of the people, it would not have fallen. Don't you find a full scale invasion more odious?

I don't see it as being my business.

So you believe Roe v Wade should have stood, or been codified.

I stand corrected. You are not a man of your values or convictions.

I came up with it from this statement If you have such conviction, supporting anything less than a national ban should be anathema to your values.

So you want an national abortion ban.

Meh. Biden may not have been sharp as a tack but he isn't running anymore and the person who took his place is sharper than Biden or Trump. Pity, the Republicans probably would have this election in the bag if they nominated someone other than Trump.

National? Not yet but unless you have been living under a rock, there has certainly been erosion of rights.

The women in this country might say he did.

What happened to ANYTIME ANYWHERE ANYPLACE? Tough guy Trump shows hit true colors, yellow.

Seriously? You bumped your own message from 3 minutes ago?

Meh. I'm skeptical of some rando on X. Anyone could have guessed what topics would be raised and be prepared for them.

"Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are calling for the use of paper ballots in the 2024 election. They’re right on the policy: paper ballots are one of the most important security measures states can adopt. When selections are recorded on paper, voters can easily verify that their ballot accurately reflects their choices before casting their vote. But they’re misleading on the facts: states are already doing this. Nearly all votes cast in the 2024 election will be recorded on paper. Maybe Trump and Kennedy are just a little behind the times. Or maybe their false claims are another attempt to undermine trust in our elections through misinformation." Some Good News for Donald Trump: We Already Use Paper Ballots

There he goes again, grabbing pu$$y.

I don't know that this war is endless. I'm just pointing out the absurdity of you question.

Name the war whose end date you predicted while it was ongoing.