ans4e64

It makes no sense to cut him. There are two much better options. 1.) He plays his ass off because maybe there is some new sort of motivation. 2.) He is the same player he has been, and the Bills don't want him as a distraction for the rest of the season, so they put him on IR where he can disappear, and they try and trade him in the offseason. Cutting him would be retarded.

Do you know what tampering is?

Dude...

The Jauron ones (40 year old virgin and jim carey) and Kevin Everett/Cleveland ones were my favorite.

Denney, Bryan, or Ellis.

No, and that's the point. I give up. You win.

No, not really. I am not saying we need to draft another receiver because we don't know about Hardy. You said that we can ignore filling the TE position because Hardy would be more of a factor next year. That is way different. Your way, you are leaving a bad hole on our team's offense (TE) in hopes that another position player will pick up the slack. If that other position can't pick up the slack, now you've got 2 positions that are bad. Bottom line: we need a TE, badly.

I wouldn't have given a 2nd round pick for him. A 3rd is the highest I'd go.

Is it written in Hardy's contract somewhere that in his second year it is guaranteed that he will "come around"? You can't approach an offseason not addressing needs because you assume players will "come around."

You're right. Lets keep players that aren't producing on the roster because they have "big" salaries. We don't need an upgrade. How would you know? Have you seen him play in the NFL somewhere? Do you really think that NFL teams base playing time according to a descending rank order of salaries? Step away from your Xbox 360...

Probably because once again, we are in the bottom third of the league in sacks. Ever heard of Osi Umenyiora, Robert Mathis, Aaron Kampman, Alex Brown, Aaron Schobel, Kyle Vanden Bosch, or Derrick Burgess?

Its eating me alive every time I see people saying that we gave up a 2nd and 3rd rounder for him. The only pick we gave up was the third. He was our second pick. We gave two picks to get one back, that is a net loss of one draft pick, not two. Considering we got a Pro Bowl DT in Stroud for a 3rd and 5th rounder, and traded McCargo for a 4th, I'd say its an excellent return based on the market. Randy Moss went for a 4th for chrissakes. DT was a top need before the trading of McCargo. With or without McCargo, if Stroud goes down, we are screwed. McCargo wasn't adding anything except a pain in Jauron's ass. Kyle Williams is a very good player, but we need a second bigger guy for depth.

Good. Maybe someone can get to the QB in his absence.

Why the hell is it so expensive in the suburbs of Buffalo?

Trade deadline is over, so the next possible time you could trade him would be after the season, which he is a free agent and the Lions could just sign him

Anyone can play DT...

I'd take DT Dre Moore off Tampa Bay's practice squad in a heartbeat.

I'm betting at least better than Fowler

.

I don't see why. If Chris Ellis can't even get some time, why would they promote Mace? To sit on the bench and be inactive? You can't tell me he's that good on special teams.

Its 2 hours past the deadline and we don't know what the trade was? Why?

Atlanta.

Is Jefferson still on Atlanta?

Someone off the street (i.e. Jason Jefferson) is no worse than McCargo was.

Because McCargo was contributing and was active for games.