Jump to content

stinky finger

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by stinky finger

  1. A buddy of mine who is a 49ers fan, (yes, they seemingly still have a few) said this trade actually makes it a near sure thing that San Fran will draft Davis as they really need an offensive weapon and defensive help. He sees the 49ers taking Greenway or a d-back with the newly acquired pick.

    665912[/snapback]

    Makes sense to me. Davis gives Smith a target and Greenway replaces Peterson, provided he's there at #22.

  2. i am beginning to think the Bills will go with either Ngata or Bunkley with their first pick.  (unless they manage to trade down.)

    my preference would be to see them take Winston Justice first but I also think there will be OLinemen available with their 2nd and 3rd round picks that can contribute right away, while the DL depth will drop off significantly after the first round.

    665299[/snapback]

    Conversely, I don't think the drop off at DT is as you say. At this point, I'd like us to drop 2-3 spots and take Justice. IMO, Detroit and Arizona will bypass WJ. Justice, IMO, will be better at his position than Ngata will be at his. Quality interior lineman, offensive and defensive, can be had in subsequent rounds.

  3. By the way:  This opinion is coming from a person who was NEVER ga ga over this mammoth tackle... but at the same time I look forward to him putting on the Bills uniform.

    665213[/snapback]

    So you're not, as you put it, "ga ga" over Ngata yet you'd select him over Hawk or D'Brick? Are you high? :ph34r:

  4. 1. Last year, Nate was toasted many times.

    2. The Bills are in the middle of a 3-4 year rebuilding.

    3. Rebuilding is best done through the draft.

    4. The better the draft pick number, the better the players drafted (generally).

    5. Therefore, trade Nate for more draft picks.

     

    What's the best case scenario if he stays? He has 3 good years during a rebuilding period. I say send him packing.

    661116[/snapback]

    I like Nate, and we're certainly better with him, but we are rebuilding. If the deal were right, I'd move him.

  5. Bills get from Vikes...#17, #41, #48, #51, #73, and Vikes get #8 and #70, #105.

    Didn't we already have #73?

     

    If you're right, this is great. Note that we'd have 4 Round 2 picks in a draft loaded with Guards and DT's in that range.

     

    17. Marcus McNeill, OT, Auburn

    41. Darnell Bing, S, USC

    42. Max Jean-Gilles, OG, Georgia

    48. Claude Wroten, DT, LSU

    51. Davin Joseph, OG, Oklahoma

    73. Daryn Colledge, OT, Boise St.

    663117[/snapback]

    I like your thinking, though McNeil is a reach at #17. Every other pick looks realistic and just what the Dr. ordered. Looks like we have options should other teams desires to move up are fevered. Exciting to think about!!

  6. While I agree that the Bills moving would be disasterous, I am still an NFL fan. I would still go about watching on Sundays. In time, I might be inclined to hook my wagon to another team (probably the Browns). NO WAY would it replace the love and passion as I had for the Bills, but somehow I'd manage.

     

     

    The fact that I'm a Fantaasy Football junkie also helps.

  7. Teams looking for secondary help in this draft are the Dolphins (hell no), the Chargers (possible) , Kansas City (Possible)  are only round one options, possible 2nd round teams would be Green Bay, Arizona or Detroit.

     

    The good of a trade - Saving on cap, adding high round pick

     

    The bad of a trade - Need to allocate a high pick for a CB, talent level drop-off

     

    Much prefer to sign Nate to a long-term contract

    661064[/snapback]

    Well said.

×
×
  • Create New...