stinky finger

Well put. I would agree that a "successful" draft strategy would run, generally speaking, on this premise of "best available". Having said that, RB though a need, is not what we're targeting in round 1. Or at least not with our first selection. I think it's very real ML might just do another trade up into the 1st round much like last year and perhaps scoop up Lynch. Should Peterson fall to us, does he represent the best available VALUE to the Bills? Take him or trade out?

Good observation. Whatever the position, they're looking for immediate impact, IMO.

Exactly. We all have our ideas as to weakness and strength on this roster, but Bills brass, what's their perception?

It'll be interesting to see who comes off the board 1st for us this draft. It's been posted here that we don't need shutdown type corners (bye-bye NC...enter Youboty, Greer, Thomas). This post suggests our MLB is on the roster already in AC. We've added 3 OL thru FA, you have to believe this position is not a high priority if a priority at all. Don't need a QB. By all accounts don't need a WR. You're set at safety. We hear Royal is satisfactory, though I'd like to see a more dynamic threat. Schobel is anchored on one side with a platoon of Kelsay/Denney. There are #'s at the DT position, though I'd contend we could be more stout. RB appears to be the biggest need, no? I'm just not thrilled with selecting one at #12. I would take one if there was something else in it for us, that being another pick thru a trade down. DT and LB would be the next area of concern. I'd like to get inside the heads of our decision makers and see what THEY perceive to be our area(s) of greatest need and just how they plan on addressing them. Will the first couple of picks represent what they perceive to be greatest need or are they selecting best available? I can't wait to find out.

Funny stuff

love = door ....just funnin' ya, tiger.......carry on.

Leave the "e" off for excitement!

Jesus H. Christ......why?........WHY??????

This might be the biggest load of crap I've read on this board. You're pulling my leg, right?

So we keep him because we OWE him?!?!? I don't think so. Didn't WM work hard to get back? If Marv has the oppurtunity to move Takeo, he would in a heartbeat, IMO. Sentiment doesn't come into play here.

Winthrop........?!?!?!....freakin' WINTHROP?!?!?

Yea.....ummmm.....about that....I was just kidding......Pardon me while I go load for bear. I'll be back to rip you a new one.

great.......now you're mad at me.

No. Not on me. Banks open on St Patricks Eve?

How about Briggs for Stratton? A trade of a couple of high motor guys.

mmmmm...tough one.....I can see him fitting in 3/8 MAYBE 1/2 the schemes. Should excel on 3rd downs.

But he's a warrior and an emotional leader. Plus HE wants to be here. Won't you at least think about it a little more?

45% truth 70% rumor This is called giving it your all...........and then some.

THIS is anything but logical........

Who said anything about trading him? Not me. Though it could happen. He could get cut. Hell if I know. How's that for logic?

Yep. I think Spikes is out. We trade down with GB and take Willis then move back into round 1 and select Poszluzny. BAM!................NEEEEEEEEXT!

....must be.

POST REPEATER!!!!! Someone.....ANYONE....stop the madness!!!

hmmmm....uh huh

Feeling particularly agreeable this morning, Beerball?