stinky finger

Not buying it. I don't think a #1 will ever be a part of a deal for MT.

This was done more or less tongue-in cheek. Perhaps had I attached one of these " " it would have served me better. Schobel is clearly staying put as he should.

I'm sorry. Were these pictures of Cheerleader tryouts or a Jenny Craig class? What a pack of sows.

He got off a wonderful onetimer in the third as well. He looked very sharp.

Your avatar......the booty.....it's bountiful.......thank you.

Is Schobel shaping up to be our next OLB? Sure as hell sounds like it. Carricker at #12 anyone?

Look 12 posts above, my brother. I'm with ya.

Ohhhh...yea.....thanks for clarifying that. I seemed to have overlooked that little point. What a dummy.

Great point.

Hey.....uhhhhhh....you gunna finish that?

Do away with C, Tipster, and we can talk.

Certainly more palatable if Willis is gone, but, we obviously have to wait until draft day to find this out and by then, it my be too late. Interesting to see how this little game of chicken turns out.

It's difficult to argue with this logic. I love the player, MT, but I just can't see giving up anything more than what we got for WM. Yes, I think MT would be a better player than WM was here, but the circumstances are what they are. MT is a backup for a team that will lose him in a year, and barring a serious injury to LT, will have little impact on his team. That is the market. I want the player, I just don't want to overpay with picks. I feel we can acquire the best back available and maintain our #12 selection and get an impact player there. (Willis) I won't jump from a ledge should ML swap 1sts to obtain the services of MT, I just don't think it's necassary, IMO.

If she downs one more cruller they just might. She's turned into a gorgeous Rosie O'Donnell. Except for the carpet munching.

Very sad. RIP......

These clips do suggest he's strong and fast. Any durability issues?

What I get from this? We can't trade for a RB who doesn't get selected to be in the unveiling of a team photo. Say no to MT.

I believe the Red Sox traveled this road in '04. The ers that they are.

I'm happy that the names have changed at a couple of the positions. Dockery seems to be a clear upgrade while I'm hopeful Walker is in a better place to succeed. RG, RT is a bit sketchy in that we're not sure who will play where, regardless of what the depth chart states. I'm also hopeful for an injury free camp leading up to the season so this unit, however constructed, can become the cohesive unit we'd all like to see it become. I've stated before that I wouldn't at all be surprised to see us land Levi Brown should he be there at #12. Not likely there, I understand, but I pick him if he were. Lock him in at RT and move Walker, long arms and all, to RG. Hell, while we're at it, lets move back up into the 1st and select Kalil. Not only will you have the Best OL, but the best depth that is necassary. Forget about your OL for the foreseeable future. Ignoring other needs? I guess, but our strength, ladies and gentlemen, will be clearly defined. We're not winning a SB this year anyway, a news bulletin I know, but we'd have the rest of this years draft and next to fill other holes. Some of you who clearly are more in tune with potential LB, CB and RB gems could perhaps fill in the blanks for these positions later in this years draft that you'd deem acceptable. Lets create a ROCK SOLID foundation. I can't think of a better way, but then again, what the hell do I know?

This is a question mark. He certainly hasn't been called upon to catch the rock. Of course Rudi Johnson doesn't make a living catching passes but I'd hook my wagon to that horse any day.

He's a good and sometimes very good RB. It all depends on the situation. Guys like LT will shine anywhere. Most need help from a servicable OL and other talent around him. Jordan in the right situation can carry the load. I would classify the following runners in the same class...Michael Turner, LaMont Jordan and Rudi Johnson. Rudi Johnson flys under the radar, IMO but is a very good back. Why? he plays with some awfully good talent and and upper echelon OL. A good, hard runner. Aren't the Bills looking to put the pieces together correctly? They've virtually broken down the entire roster and have begun to rebuild the trenches, both OL and DL. They have their QB and 1st class WR. Now they need a RB to carry the load. MT can be that guy. I just hope we don't overpay unnecassarily with picks and a head-scratching contract. But make no mistake. MT can be the RB to bring us to where we all want to be, IMO.

You'd think he'd make a better Packer......

Ahhhhhh yes...... the innocent, italicized pubescent crackle of another LSI (Low Salt Intake?) post. Homework and straight to bed mister......lunch moneys' on the counter....signed permission slip to Dora the Explorer on Ice in backpack.....sweet dreams little soldier......sweet dreams.

left to right....Peters - Dockery - Kalil - Walker - Pennington RUN TURNER, RUN!!!

brilliant