All I want from him is to play a good QB for my team. I want him to play it so well that he becomes one of those players who doesn't show up to these camps because he's so good and we give him a free pass for not showing (ie...Bruce Smith, Mike Strahan).
Since that isn't happening, he should show up to bolster his stock with his present situation or for some other team. I can't get too excited just because he has decided to attend a non-mandatory camp. Big deal.
That would be incorrect, sir. That is to say, I thought we WOULD draft a RB last year in the 1st and we WILL NOT draft a WR in the 1st this year. Now move along. Go on. Git!
So you wouldn't take Ellis or Dorsey if they were to fall? Just askin'......... Are you telling me Harvey wouldn't be an improvement? There is no such thing as having an "abundance" of talent in the trenches. I don't care what your other needs are. Quality DL makes your secondary better and an outstanding OL makes your QB, WR and RB better.
There isn't a WR in this class that would even remotely make the Bills better than a trench guy. You can EASILY fill your desire for a WR in round 2 or later. Next!
Apparently, we can find "fault" with any of these WRs, therefore, all are too risky @ #11, IMO. WR & TE can be addressed sufficiently in rounds 2 & 3.
Bills brass goes OL, DL or CB with 1st pick. Just a gut feeling.
Adding help to the trenches on either side of the ball is always sound, IMO. Recognizing we have needs elsewhere, I wouldn't condemn the front office for adding to the 2 most important units on the field, the OL & DL.
Nice, Ozy. You're a real class act. BTW, I wasn't protecting Pete, merely pointing out the way you took him LITERALLY.
Mother jokes?!?!?! Hey Oz, I didn't know comedy was a prerequisite to getting your GED. Nice job, LOSER!!