One of the things I do not like is the overall ratings do not accurately reflect how good the player is. Say you have an o-lineman with like 30 for agilty and 30 for speed. These guys should never be good players, but mnay of them will end up with high rankings because they have really good strength lets say, but high strength I do not think should be enough to overcome the poor speed and agility.
As for the draft the guys in you first franchise season are realistic like Lee and JP and Dunta Robinson. I mean the cpu generated players in the draft. Like I said NCAA 2005 is not an option. I know what you mean about linebackers one time I shifted a linebaker rated something 70 overall in the 3rd round shifted him to DE and he was ranked something like 85. I do not find this to be particularly realistic, though as defensive lineman are so coveted so it seems like they should start out as lineman. I always shift players from gaurd to tackle or center to guard etc. te to fullback. Thanks for the tips.