Jump to content

Dr. Who

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,037
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dr. Who

  1. Very tired of this take. McConkey is not a slot receiver. He took 80% of his snaps on the outside. He's a flanker, movement Z whatever term you like. They need to get 2 WRs. One of them should be an X, but there absolutely is room for McConkey, who is an out of the box volume receiver year one.
  2. I don't want Coleman and Franklin. I'll probably get Cooper Dejean at #33 and WR in a trade up from 60. I would try to find a way to land Mitchell and McConkey. Polk is a fella I like closer to 60.
  3. I still hate it. I'm not convinced he's a boundary receiver, and he absolutely is not a fella that's going to get you separation, which is what we need. I'd much rather end up with McConkey and Mitchell. Of course, if we take him, I'll hope for the best.
  4. I wasn't that high on the fast feather, but it's going to look bad if he thrives with you evil lot. I still like Mitchell and McConkey. I would have taken either one at #28, but second round and adding draft capital is fine. Maybe Beane will trade back again, who knows?
  5. Yes, he is, and it's McConkey. They should take 2 WRs day 2, regardless. They need an X and a Z.
  6. Folks are talking about Aiyuk and Jefferson. That would cost a lot. I'd at least try and see if Hopkins is available. You sure as hell do not want to turn Josh Allen into a dink and dunk QB. That would be a monstrous waste of talent, and it's not who he is. We need some big play ability. We still lack a boundary receiver to stretch the field. Beane should add 2 WRs tomorrow, one way or another. Yes, tomorrow should be interesting.
  7. Well, supposedly he is good now. You'd have to be convinced he can be durable in the NFL, but I think he is healthy. I live near Athens, and love the guy. I really think he can be a volume receiver year one.
  8. Seriously, Shakir and Samuel, who is a plus gadget guy? That's the best currently in our WR room. Beane has to add. It's terrible right now, and an absolute disservice to Josh Allen. I still like Mitchell and McConkey. I'm not high on Coleman and Franklin, though some are. Might be a draft choice and a veteran that is available.
  9. Jets moved back one, but I take your point.
  10. Alright. Now that we've read out our fortune cookies, let's just watch the draft.
  11. Defeatist attitudes invite defeat. It doesn't make you smarter than the average bear.
  12. It was never, ever very likely.
  13. Did you call Indiana and find out if Beane trades up?
  14. That's a resume builder in the NHL. No one blinks at that.
  15. I sorta want to know the cost, and then again, I sorta don't.
  16. Oh, thanks. I guess I'm obtuse to his sense of humor.
  17. I hate to tell you, but they are an hour behind EST.
  18. I thought you were going to say if they had cheerleaders. You're probably right, but I still like my idea.
  19. Complete lack of judgment in those who want to add Brown to the mix in order to get the WR they covet. Who is going to plausibly replace him in the lineup? The Bills invested the time to develop him, and now they should what, put La'el Collins in there to replace him? Van Demark did not look good on the right side in the snaps he took at RT. I've yet to hear an intelligent reply to these concerns from the enthusiasts for pay any price to get a top 3 WR.
  20. Yes, it was just a joke, and I agree about inquiry. I am Catholic, so I surmise we have different views on theology. Still think you're a very bright fella. Worthy is not my favorite, but he's real value there, and indeed, any victory over those KC villains, even virtual, is Worthy of celebration.
  21. Yes, you know, I've heard this argument a number of times over the last few months. Turner and Verse will be gone for sure. Latu if he falls because of injury concerns, and Robinson. I'm not sure who else you would consider. I just don't like Robinson. I wouldn't take him at 28. If I didn't like a WR there (well, I'm pretty sure I would), but if I didn't I would rather try and trade back. Latu is the only fella I think you should consider if you are okay with the medicals. I think someone will take him before 28. And then, I think they need a big X and a Z, so I want two WRs early if I can find value there. So the depth at WR to me means maybe I can get two early. I know you think differently, and you're welcome to have your own views, of course. I've already apologized to my TV for the breakage that will happen if Robinson is the pick.
  22. Who am I to argue with Jesus?
  23. If that is true, and it causes him to drop to 28, I'd take that risk.
×
×
  • Create New...