Jump to content

Chilly

Community Member
  • Posts

    12,485
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chilly

  1. You mean the 3rd string power RB who signed for the vet minimum isn't an integral part of the offense? Oh, I forgot, "LOL TWO FB STUPID BILLS" is the narrative we're supposed to eat up.
  2. Or maybe 20% of the QBs proving the point incorrect means it's not that correlated.
  3. Not exactly true; Tyrod can still earn $30 million in the first two years on this deal, which is pretty similar to his old contact.
  4. He'll be a Power RB with us. Not near as good of a blocker as DiMarco, and has several seasons of more of a RB role in his career. For sure, that year he had 50+ catches with SD was stellar.
  5. More of a power RB than a FB, not a great blocker.
  6. Hoyer is a 49er.
  7. Cheaper than Felton. In 2015 we signed FB Jerome Felton to a four-year, $9.2 million deal.
  8. https://twitter.com/fbgchase/status/839579381936726017 Tyrod Taylor in 2015 had the 5th best passer rating in Bills history, after adjusting for era (2nd best unadjusted)
  9. Jerome Felton in 2015 was signed to a four-year, $9.2 million contract.
  10. Good news for us is we were #7 in red zone TD % so we have this QB thing figured out. Same with SF who was #2. https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/red-zone-scoring-pct
  11. I predict by April 28th, this will be Bill in NYC after all the DBs we've drafted:
  12. Aiken would be a better #3 than what we've had
  13. Fact is Tyrod isn't making that much, has a small cap hit, and we can release him after three years. I have no idea why people think it's "too expensive", he'll make significantly more on the open market.
  14. It's cool, none of us can always be correct.
  15. Watson is my favorite QB in this draft, but I'm not convinced he'll be better than Tyrod. He certainly has a shot but it feels more like treading water than moving forward.
  16. To a legitimate offense.
  17. I'd give up our tenth overall pick to get a new #1 receiver in a heartbeat. Keep Tyrod. Let's go!
  18. Hah, same here. That's also why I rarely drink during the weekdays. After about 2 drinks I don't want to stop.
  19. I've cut way back on drinking myself. I basically hardly ever do it on weekdays anymore, only sometimes on the weekends, and never at my house (only when I'm out with friends / at a hockey game /etc). I feel SO MUCH BETTER overall now that I've cut way back. I still enjoy it when I do, I don't consume as much when I do drink (it hits me a lot harder), I feel better in general and I've lost weight. I think there's a happy medium for each person to find and it's really, really hard to find it if you naturally like to drink. It definitely took me years to do so.
  20. I don't even necessarily think it has to be a majority of their customers, I think the NFL has a right to do what it thinks is the best thing to do for their product when it's something that could influence their customer experience. Whether I think it's smart for them to do it or I agree/disagree with their position is a separate matter to me - but I don't have an issue with them doing it. For me, on this specific issue, I have an opinion but I care very little about it.
  21. I have zero issues with the NFL taking a stand on something that impacts their customer experience.
  22. Don't mistake state and city pride for arrogance. I love this city and wholeheartedly believe it's the best place to live for me, but there are downsides. Our public transportation is non existent and traffic is awful, for example. But in general almost everything is satisfactory to awesome which is why I love it. The people, food, culture, economy are all great.
  23. There's no reason to doubt!
×
×
  • Create New...