Fan in Chicago

What was the point of your post ?

Then again, I recall this same Jim Kelly singing Trent's praises last year.

Great ! Considering what Levy did with his choice of HC and draft picks*, his advice will only serve to drive this franchise even more into the ground. * I don't subscribe to the theory that he did not have much to do in the draft

"So the question looms: Are Marv Levy and Ralph Wilson ready to make a bold move?" Levy ?

Don't worry - its nothing that a Bills fan would understand

Then again, I am not sure I ever saw the terms of DJ's renewed contract.

Jauron's firing was to appease the now apathetic fan base. Not much will happen in the rest of the season to either salvage it or prepare for next season.

Popular with opposing teams ...

I know your post was not directed at me. But I have always been skeptical about Trent but wanted desperately for him to be the one so we get stability at that position. However, at this point, putting Fitz in does nothing at all unless Trent has totally given up on the game/Bills/season. If that is the case, then I would cut him outright a la Hobert.

If it is desperation move on Jauron's part to save his job, I think it is stupid. Reminiscent of the JP-Holcomb situation. If it is because the coaches are convinced that either Trent has given up or has post-concussion problems then I am indifferent to this move. My opinion is that if Trent is healthy, he should play

Agree with you here. No matter who is right or wrong, we are now left with no QB hope for the future. It will take a re-build but this time it better be well thought out and executed. Until such time as the OL and coaching problems are fixed I would vote against drafting a QB high in next year's draft. For example, if we take a QB with our first round pick without addressing what kind of offense we are going to run and who the OL (tackles) will be, we will set this franchise back another few years. As it is, this is a lost decade (okay maybe not the entire decade) - at least let us plan on making the next one ours.

Yes the decision to put Fitz in was very interesting but I think quite pointless. At this time of the season, with the talent (and I use the word VERY loosely) we have on the coaching staff and on the OL, what can possibly brew ? The only thing we can do now is to use the remaining games to: - re-shuffle the OL: Levitre at LT, Wood at C and put the others wherever you want as they aren't doing a stellar job anyway. - bench TO and play Johnson. Is Hardy healthy yet ? I see he was out again this last Sunday - Continue to play Trent and complete the evaluation

Happened to me too but I think it was during the Miami game. I just don't feel excited about a good drive or disappointed in a blown opportunity. I used to tell my ex-GFs that the day I stop feeling possessive about you is when you know I stopped loving you. Unfortunately for me, I am so attached to the Bills that I cannot dump them.

Yes it could have - if the Bills had won.

That reasoning does not work in this case. He is a great coach and has a good team. But that decision is stupid which is not to comment on any other aspect of his coaching or his team.

BB is calling Simon as we speak

Sure he did. But from their own 30 ? With no timeouts and with the lead ? Not sure if you are rationalizing that decision but I think it was wrong.

Peyton is God

Way to stick it to the hoodie freak

I would call it borderline stupid. Pats* have the lead and can't trust their defense to stop the Colts after a punt ? If they were trailing, it would have been a good call

Agreed. I also think TO has been a 'bust' for us.

No

Only point I disagree with in your list. Yes there was way too much air but the ball was in TO's hands. An elite receiver is supposed to bail his QB out, especially TO who is supposed to be exceptionally strong. He should have fought for the ball.

I voted zero because I think Schaub will be so worried about throwing towards Byrd that he will let our other DBs get the INTs. So total team INT prediction = 2, Byrd = 0

Not really. Lack of sacks does not mean no pass rush. Lately, we have pressured opposing QBs into hurried throws quite a bit.