RLflutie7

And there are people who've said that white people are not going to like being the minority.

3. That's is why back in 1999 or 2000, I said putting women in the work force was a huge mistake. To maintain a upper middle class lifestyle, women put off child birth because they want a career and they use birth control. The white population gets richer and has a upper middle class and they start having less children. The white population becomes more rich for a very short period of time. And then it all implodes because there is no young people left to support all the old rich people when they get old. Mexicans are imported because there is not enough young white people left. Like the article said, having kids and having a middle class lifestyle are not compatible. So what you have today is a society with a bunch of uppity white women who are not having children.

on fox sports.

I don't think the Falcons will be drafting a QB. Arthur Blank is not done with Michael Vick. Blank says Vick is writing him letters from prison and Blank is writing him back. Blank also says that Vick is playing prison football. I read this story on Yahoo from the New York Daily News. I find this hard to understand, but I think Blank has a soft spot for Vick, like the article says, and he going to take him back. The next day the prison came out and said it's not true (playing prison football). They said the prison football season was over before Vick got there. Thoughts? I'll check back on Monday.

I was thinking of another guy and I don't know who that was either. Sorry to Fred Jackson. I need to watch the Cleveland and Miami games. I recorded them, but I haven't watched them. I was wrong and I'm sorry.

I'd agree with you about left tackle, and yes, I'd take a QB every year, but NOT in the first round. I'd take a six round pick very often. In other words, a "throw away pick". You never know when you're going to get lucky. What I'm saying is you can use these picks as currency. If you find a good back in the sixth round, you can use him as trade bait, getting a third round choice for him. That way you can always stock pile in the draft without trading up. Offense sells tickets and that's what I mean by making a splash with the fans. That's what the draft is all about.

I said that defense is what wins games. That's why I say get defense in FA. You no NOTHING about a player from college only. In FA you have a PROVEN track record. Offense sells tickets and it takes longer to develop offensive players in the NFL. Therefore, home grown talent i.e. the draft is the best way to build an offensive team. Offensive line is the one position that takes the longest to develop, so getting a FA O-line men is likely to bring a bust from another team. O-line has to work together as a unit more so than any other position. I can't understand why a team needs 10 defensive backs and 10 wideouts 10 linebackers and 4 tightends when coaches tell us how important that running game is. Why not invest more money in running backs. I'd have at least 6 running backs on my roster. Plus many RB play special teams anyway. Also some teams only keep 2 QBs. That's just retarded. Keep three minimum. How many times have teams gone to "emergency QBs." I heard announcers say that about three or four teams this past year. To me that's unbelieveable. Yet they'll have 10 WR.

My post said: Don't take a DB or WR with the first pick. Select offense skill positions in the draft, but take RB and QBs first. I said take a QB every year regardless. I also said take a RB every draft because they don't last long. Tom Brady was taken in the sixth-round when Drew Bledsoe was the face of the franchise. I said build your defense through free agency.

2. The guy you're talking about (what's his name) is not a No. 2 back. You're crazy if you think he is. 3. yes you are right. Buffalo sucked on D last year. And the Bills did the right thing by addressing that in free agency. They got a run stuffer and a top notch player at the right position. OK now leave that defense alone until later in the draft (way later) or get a medium priced CB. 4. I'm saying don't waste the No. 1 pick on WR. I didn't say don't take them. If anything the Bills should take the QB Ryan if he falls. Get a WR in the second and go after a CB in the third at the very highest. And Ryan falling that far is very very doable. Looking at some of the mock drafts prove it. Miami won't take a QB. They're going after a D player. The Chiefs are the only team that could take a QB. I don't buy Baltimore going after a QB. Getting Ryan or Stewart or Mendenhall can happen. It will happen. One will be available. Get a WR in the second round. I just said Patrick Kerney wasn't a mid-priced free agent. I was comparing position vs. price. I just wouldn't spend that kind of money on a DB. Roy Williams (Dallas) can't cover anyone. Get a clue. He's a good hitter but that's it.

You are talking about a player who is marginal at best and you're saying I'm not studying the team well enough. Give me a break. Many teams follow my plan and it's sound. The Broncos are always bringing in RB talent. That's why they have a good running game. The Patroits always find defensive players that are too old but they seem to work out. They've taken some defensive players in the draft, but they don't load up on defense the way some teams do. Minnesota had a great defense last year and their best players were free agents. Talking about a WR or CB in the 1st round is a waste, plan and simple. And studying the team is not going to bring a better arguement for that. Getting a QB (Ryan) and a running back Mendenhall is NOT far fetched. Let those other teams take the CBs.

2. Then why don't I know his number. He's a nothing. Finding someone cheap to compete with him is nothing that can't be done. 4. That's what I'm saying. Getting lucky in late rounds could really help Buffalo. Buffalo needs offensive players not defense. And I'm reading CB on the NFL Network and Scott Wrights mock draft. To me that's just stupid. How many points did Buffalo score last year? p.s. what's wrong with medium priced free agents? Especially on defense. They can produce for you. That way, when a offense player from the draft goes bust you can keep taking them. Also Patrick Kerney and Clements were an example of position not price. Sorry for the confusion. Furthermore, the Detroit Lions are a prime example of a draft that was totally screwed up. Instead of taking a wideout they could have had Adrian Peterson. Yea, the had two other starters. But look at them now. They are in need my friend. Instead of taking WR No 1. overall they could have gone after QBs and RBs.

1. I didn't say you said take a WR. Others have. 2. Sorry I'm not buying the Fred Jackson thing. What's his number? I don't even know. 3 Why wouldn't you have good WRs. I said focus on offense with QBs and RBs then WR next. But don't draft CBs and WR first and find good proven defensive help in FA. 4. I guess you missed Green Bay and Matt Hasselback. You missed Saint Louis and Kurt Warner and Marc Bulger. Bulger was a sixth round pick wasn't he? 5. Ryan could be had. Don't be sold on him going that high. Parcells is going to take defense. 6. Rookies do get huge bonuses so why waste it on an unproven defensive player. Take an offensive player. Chiefs and Larry Johnson and Priest Holmes. S.F paid huge money for Nate Clemens. Did they make the playoffs? Seattle paid huge money for Patrick Kerney. Did they make the playoffs? Did I miss anything?

The New England Patroits have had a lot of free agents on defense during the Tom Brady era. Their entire defense? No, but a great number of them. What I'm saying is concentrate on offense more than defense in the draft.

Buffalo could use another weapon at RB. What if you have an injury? The Bills don't have that luxury. The QB situation is muddled at best. Keep talking about a wideout . . . makes no sense.

What was S.F. record? Did they make the playoffs? They need to find a new QB now or they are just wasting the money they paid to Clements. I'm not saying Clements is bad player. He's good, but find a QB.

The draft is a cheap labor pool???? On NFL Network, NFL owners and just about everyone else wants to get rid of the huge signing bonuses paid out to unproven rookies taken in the first round. The ill will you're talking about is directed at rookies right now. They haven't done anything but they get to ruin a team. A good proven veteran defense (LB and DL) will create winning quicker than drafting overpriced slugs in the first round. Examples: Green Bay with QBs: Mark Bruenell, Matt Hasselback. In other words: They didn't stop drafting QBs once they had Brett Farve. Dallas Cowboys: Jimmy Johnson won Superbowls with Charles Haley. Haley drafted by S.F. Houston Texans: They drafted a CB and neglected the QB position after it was clear that David Carr was a huge bust. If they would have kept drafting QBs maybe they could have found a solution quicker. Granted Daute Robinson is a good player, but they still were a terrible team.

I would also say that Pro-football-weekly is the best at talent evaluation.

I can't understand why NFL teams draft so many DBs in the first round. It seems recent history points to that. And why take a DB when all we're ever told is how important the QB and running game is to success and a winning record and playoff victories. My thinking is: The way the league is, it's better to draft offense and make a splash with fans. If public perception is so important, I think drafting offense is the only way to go. USE FREE AGENCY to sign the top defensive talent. Because defense is what wins games and it's better to go with proven players on defense. You can't have busts on defense and it seems teams have been having a lot of busts on defense lately. I would draft a QB EVERY YEAR. Use him as trade bait to collect extra picks (not first rounders, too expensive) if he proves to be good, but not starting material on your team. I would draft a QB in any round. Including a first rounder. That way you could stock pile 2nd and 3rd rounders and build your team. I would also draft a RB every year. Probably two RB's. They don't last long and you could always have quality players in the wings. Plus you could use them as trade bait if you get like three or four guys that are quality. Many teams like Tampa needed running backs. RBs go done more than QBs. I wouldn't use a 1st rounder on O-line either. Too many Robert Gallery's, Mike Williams and Leonard Davis's out there. Take O-line in the later rounds and find those gems.

I taped all of those classic games from a few years ago. I don't know why they can't replay more now. But it seems they don't want to. They want to get paid for it. See above. I think I would pay for it but I don't think the average person would. It could fail. I have an idea that they could replay all Monday night football games. Start from the first Monday night game and replay them all in order. It could be called "Classic Monday Night". And they could have programming for a long time. But I doubt they would do it. It seems the NFL Network is only about what's happening right now.

I remember that commercial. I don't think we'll see this on NFL network. This is something we'll see on the computer like you said. For a fee. And I'm fine with that. And then they'll put it on DVDs. And that will be the best selling ones on the computer. This also could fail. I just want NFL to replay more of the old classic games like their Superbowl classic games. And did you notice that the Superbowl Classic games are running against the Arena Football on ESPN. Monday's and Saturdays. They've also showed the Bills-Oilers game last week. And Colts-Pats Championship from the Colts Superbowl year.

Because Flutie played so well in that game. I mean he really lit Miami up. And the Dolphins had one of the best secondary's in the NFL that year. I remember not wanting to play Miami. But, yes, he also played poorly. He threw a lot of balls that should have been intercepted. He got sacked a lot and he fumbled a couple times that the Bills were able to recover. So you can remember that game either way.

What many Republicans don't seem to remember is that Ronald Reagan hated big business. Reagan was a champion of the small businessman and hated big companies Thanks to Bill Clinton and Wall Street, the merger mania has caused our economy to become a third-world-type. Bill Clinton gets all the credit for the huge economic growth during his administration. But what he really did was create a "Wall-Street Bubble" economy, with excessive CEO compensation and corporate downsizing. I think if you were to look back on Clinton he is one of the worst presidents that we've ever had.

That's the problem. They refuse to learn the language and thus they don't fit into American Society. Many times the younger children learn the language, but the parents do not. And what does "welcome them all in" mean exactly? And how many of these people are you willing to welcome before you cut them off? We can't have the entire country of Mexico living here.

The website is Keelynet.com/energy/garrett.htm I never did learn how to post a link. You could also do a google.

The car gets its combustion from the hydrogen. The electricity converts the water into hydrogen and oxygen. The electricity is in the carburetor. The patent is for an electric carburetor. Garrett went to a lake and put the water in the gas tank. The water travels from the gas tank through the fuel line and into the carburator. The electric current makes hydrogen from the water and distributes it into the pistons. You don't store the hydrogen. It goes directly into the pistons. The problem is "embitterment" or something like that. I'll get the website that has the drawings and a copy of the patent.