leh-nerd skin-erd

I understand what you’re saying, but I think to most people, “experience” boils down to name recognition. AG Barr had experience and was reviled by the liberal left. AG Garland had experience and most on the right (and apparently more than a few indies and moderate Dems) saw an abuse of power on his watch. I treat these appointments like the draft and the Bills, you’ll know how they do when they get there.

Frank coming in hot after a 7 day bender with a blender. Nice!

Tibsy, square this please with the anti-gun message you mentioned yesterday?

She has a stain on her sweatshirt. Speaking only from my experience, this is the area usually impacted when eating a saucy dish prone to dripping while watching tv later in the day. Could be something else, of course, maybe she spilled coffee. I can understand the stain, but don’t you think you pop in front of a mirror before going live in this format? And seriously, the extension cord dangling in the back looks like a fire hazard.

He doesn’t care, he’s just here for the yuks!

Vivek walks into a Key Bank and asks for $20,000,000 in pennies…. I know I may be a bit naive but this all seems a bit preposterous.

His programs on his watch, will yield his outcome (assuming of course unelected bureaucrats don’t block the efforts along the way). Obviously, I’m hoping for a positive outcome, generally happy Americans and perhaps a Vance presidency in the future if warranted. If things go sideways as badly as they did for Harris/Biden, well, we deal with that then.

Ugh Tibsy. Not his beer, the bottle. Give him his nickel and get back to work. How many times do we have to go through this?

I would not put it past any party, or key members of any party, to attempt to defraud the country in any election. Power corrupts, etc. However, absent clear and convincing evidence, the President is the President. I do believe that it worked so well in 2016, we were guaranteed to see it in 2020.

It seems like the Dems have become insufferable and out of touch, and not just because they got their taints handed to them last week. Oh, wait, that is why. Remember Frank, our discussion of all the little things that no one cares about and thoughts shared on the relative dangers of a thousand paper cuts. I don’t remember who said that? Oh wait, yes I do. It was me.

I'm named after my great-grandfather. My screen name was chosen because one of the first albums I ever purchased was released by the rock and roll band you have referenced. I'm not a gun owner and figure there has to be some sensible compromise between the rights of lawful gun owners and those who seek to disarm them, but that's a discussion for another day. I prefer this song, today and generally: Oh, take your time, don't live too fast Troubles will come and they will pass You'll find a woman, yeah, and you'll find love And don't forget son there is someone up above And be a simple kind of man Oh, be something you love and understand Baby, be a simple kind of man Oh, won't you do this for me son, if you can?

I think he's addressed at least part of this, no?

Whistleblowers are what they are. Some are credible. Some are political. Happens to both parties, and people believe what they believe based on political affiliation. Time to leave the past in the past.

The world is changing, Kay, and bigotry is bigotry. If you don’t like what you’re seeing in midtown, consider that you’re not at all unlike a 1960s business man not liking the changes coming to his version of midtown. Or, that you likely would have been on the wrong side of the Stonewall raids in 1969. Then again, it’s entirely possible you’re just ridiculously inebriated.

No way. Someone always gets the first package in the mail from the manifesto guy.

I’m getting a real manifesto vibe here. Talk to someone to sort all this out.

I literally just said I hope Smith doesn’t go to jail, and shared ny thoughts on why transparency is so important as we try to heal. I have no idea if he did anything wrong, though I would think the devil will be in the details. Oh, check that—I do think it was wrong to bring the charges and all that followed, but i do not think that’s illegal. I think Trump may have broken laws on maintaining classified documents but believe the argument that he can declassify at will seems reasonable as well. I think Biden broke the law, and in doing so as a senator, it was far more egregious than what Trump did. End of the day, it sounds to me like the government had a program of organizational anarchy when it comes to classified material, and only seemed to be concerned when a certain admin saw an opportunity for political gain. I believe I’m in the majority here.

I sincerely hope for the sake of his family, he doesn’t. If he crossed his i’s and dotted his t’s, followed the rules everything will be fine. Reasonable people can disagree, as Chi and I have been discussing. Personally, I think he’s done a very good job of laying out the case he wanted to bring, though the judge has had to make some course corrections along the way. I also think he did a masterful job in leaking the information he wanted release (perhaps without context) in an effort to shape public opinion, though it seemed to have been in a way he did not foresee, with unintended consequences. That’s yet another course correction, I think. I think what we’ll find is some things were done within the letter of the law, some things were done outside the law (purposefully or otherwise), and that as whole, he was ineffective in his role based on outcome. The cost to the taxpayer is likely quite high for those who care about such things. As for testimony before Congress, the challenge there is testimony is one-sided, without the benefit of the defense responding to accusations, allegations or interpretations. But as I said before, let’s get to transparency and dialogue however it shakes out.

I understand you’re dug in here, and I’m only thinking of the greater good. It was your point that special rules are followed, not mine. I scoured the internet to find an example, and found this story about former NYS AG Cuomo, speaking about one of the many cases against Trump. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4734858-andrew-cuomo-donald-trump-alvin-bragg-hush-money-case-new-york/ “If his name was not Donald Trump and if he wasn’t running for president … I’m the former AG of in New York, [and] I’m telling you that case would’ve never been brought.” We can argue whether or not both parties are reasonable, but it is what it is. Representative Jim Jordan seems to be interested in looking into this case, and his education and subsequent experience certainly makes this noteworthy. I’m concerned, as I always am, that congressional committees are glorified dog and pony shows, but this seems to be the way to get answers Americans are looking for. If you’re correct—and you could be—-there’s certainly no harm in asking questions and rooting around in the details. We both agree there I would think, beyond concern for taxpayer funds obv.

The multi-second pause as though she was waiting for validation was weird, too. Honestly I can see her finding someone after an accident and breaking their feet to keep them from running away.

I don’t think it’s complicated at all. In fact, it’s actually pretty straightforward. As you said, people don’t get charged with a crime unless the prosecutors believe they can prove intent to a jury. I’m simply suggesting that a second review by a new, independent party may have a different view on intent. Bigger picture, relentless, aggressive and politically motivated prosecution seemed to move the needle in the opposite direction intended by the Dems.

It sounds like a very well organization, this democrat party. Trump has beaten them twice in three times in historic fashion, and the 81 year old guy they set up to fail out-politicked them. Sounds like it was Pelosi should have gotten out sooner.

Not at all. I would have thought the US Government would have had strict guidelines and rules for handling classified documents, but come to find out it was like one of those swinger parties where people just throw keys into a bowl and whomever goes with whom is ok. It seems to boil down to high ranking politicians can do whatever they want for however long they want, but if lines are crossed the likelihood of adverse consequences really depends on who is running the investigation. One guy, decades, cool, fine, you're a good man for stealing documents in such a classy way. The other guy, life in prison, mob rule. The way you restore trust is to get to the bottom of it. If criminal charges are appropriate, push forward. If Biden broke a law but it was kind of a only pretend law, that should be completely explainable. As you were trusting the system to do system things, I'm simply saying the same thing with the committee investigating. Seems pretty straight forward to me. I guess we'll see, but I would hope the Trump admin and AG would be as just as transparent as Biden's AG.

You may be right, but I think it might be a net gain for the country if the matter was pursued, even if it ends up in a loss. I think the perception of dem overreach on political persecution is one reason voters rejected the same old hash for another 4 years. As has been said so many times re: Trump and associates, if they have nothing to hide, they tell the truth and the chips fall as they do. One thing I wouldn't worry about is concern about wasting taxpayer money, that's a DC tradition. As for Smith, yeah, let's get it all out. Good, bad, ugly. Who they talked to. Who got squeezed. Tone and tenor of communication.

Maybe he shares a cell with JB? MG? Smith? Epic!