leh-nerd skin-erd

I do recognize the effort. This is indeed a step forward, and like you I simply hope it’s the start to the of so much suffering. As for emperor status, we can agree to disagree. However, you’d have much more high ground if JB didn’t waive his mighty hand and clear up a decade worth of criminality for those in his royal family. Again, that was after all sorts of authoritarian malfeasance by D leadership.

Didn’t you already post this, Skipper?

Let’s just hope he keeps the number of liberal senators that they wire tap to 8 or less. 0-8 is like, cool, but 9 plus is wicked authoritarian.

Good for you Andy, you got most of the way through it before falling back on dictatorial stuff. I presume you’re talking about when Trump had his DOJ raid Biden’s private residence, Inna-Fogg A, searching for classified documents and trying to put him in jail for life. Of course had Biden actually gone to jail, he would have been fine because he beat the snippens out of every gang leader from Scranton to Philly when he was younger, while earning a 4.0 in law school, graduating tops in his class and flying a lunar mission to Mars with Buzz Armstrong. True story. It’s fascinating looking at the recent history of the Democrat party and hear Liberal voters whine about authoritarianism.

Jiminy..you forgot to be outraged the first time!

I recall quite a few conversations with certain liberal legal folk here about the appearance of impropriety with Biden sniffing around thieve issues in close proximity to his dopey son. The feedback was that everyone in the international community knew there was one guy—and apparently one guy only in the country that needed to be dealt with. He was THE billion dollar man. It made no sense then, and with the benefit of 5 years of Biden/dem behavior in the rear view, it seems pretty clear Biden was doing business on behalf of Biden. I guess it goes into the category of “special rules for electeds.”

I have a friend born and raised in SF. Liberal fellow, funny, smart and from a wealthy family, and we’ve disagreed about politics many times in the past. Admittedly it’s been a while since we talked about San Francisco but he was quite disillusioned at the decline in standard of living he had seen of late last time we spoke. Garbage, trash, drug addicts, human excrement all over the place, and squarely placed the blame of extreme liberal policies. Perhaps they’ve fixed those issues, or maybe they’re kept out of view of visitors v allowing the locals to suffer, but how they even allowed it to get there was enough to keep me from voting for those people.

I always feel like the time he never spent with Susan Collins is time he wished he could never get back. It would make a good country song.

I'm a few days in and still trying to unpack what you're saying. All I can take away is that you don't think everything from one side or the other should be referred to as a 'hoax', though in this case you think that allegations of surveillance of GOP Senators is, indeed a hoax, that is to say, it never happened. Then, you refer to my 'mental gymnastics' when what I offered was the only truth we all can agree on: 1. Biden didn't release files. Trump has not released files. 2. Using your logic about 'way more to it', I offered that Biden would have burned Trump/GOP if possible. I further offered that Trump would have burned Biden/Dems if possible. 3. Since neither Biden nor Trump released, it stands to reason that either there is nothing in the files, or enough that either side releasing data results in mutually assured destruction. I'm open to your view on what I am missing here, but it seems to me you've decided to hyper-fixate on the politics of word tracks and accusations to the detriment of applying simple common sense to this issue.

It’s not for you to question. Blaze your own trail, follow your own path, and apply introspection when possible. —Leh-nerd 4:11

I think for taking off and landing aircraft, Drew. What are you hearing?

Latina lady? prICE? Goodness.

Yeah, that was pretty freaking awesome, to pit taxpayers on the hook for allegations of wrongdoing on a personal level. Same old story—- people like Spitzer, Cuomo, Schneiderman and now James are in charge of securing the greater good, and seem perpetually inclined toward wrongdoing.

I have known a few people who had fires in their home and to my knowledge, the president has not been involved in the investigations. It starts on a local level, and then goes from there. Now maybe the FBI was involved quite discretely in every one of those cases (some of these people are Catholic, and we know how the last admin’s DOJ felt about those people), real cloak and dagger under the radar stuff, but I do not think so. Your latest theory is that our President Trump actually set the fire based on some imagined track record? That’s nuts.

That’s what she says it was about, but then again, she was deemed ineligible to receive the honor of walking at graduation. She can address that issue by releasing a full accounting of the matter. I’d think the attack on her credibility would be the exact point of attack that would be followed given her graduation issues. These races can be decided by narrow margins, and you want to reach people that might have an issue on that sort of thing. It’s especially appropriate because she’s targeting those who released the information and because she’s done her best to position herself as the hero of the tale.