Observer
-
Posts
800 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Observer
-
-
Are you really arguing paid internet trolls do not exist? Or merely that you aren't one?
The high priest positions have been filled. But you make a good concubine for gator. Bear him an heir.
-
If I'm not mistaken, I believe it's derived from cuckold, which doesn't have racial undertones.
Oz is a "fake persona" poster so it's save to assume this particular term was meant to incite. Don't get sucked in: The fake poster act has now been done here for 20 years. The new incarnations are poor copies of the original.
-
Whether he actively colluded with HRC I can't say, but I doubt it. I think the Clinton camp may have egged him on to run a bit behind closed doors but even that is a long shot. But I just don't think Trump really thought he ever had a chance of winning when he entered the race. Tom's pushed this theory before and it makes sense.
I think Trump is competitive as hell and smarter than his public persona; smart enough to know he doesn't really have a chance to win (at least in the beginning) but competitive enough to try anyway because he knew it would cost him nothing. The advertising for his brand the campaign would bring was worth tenfold the 30 or so million he put into his campaign (if you believe his numbers, which I don't). So he figured, why the hell not run -- never expecting to win. I'm not sure the Clintons would have needed to do much prodding at all, if any, to make Donald see this.
Then he got swept up in his own hype because he's also an egomaniac in the most literal sense. I think there was a point this primary season where he honestly believed he could win and probably wanted to. But now that he's approaching the point in the campaign where he has to put up more of his own money (a lot more), I think the smarter parts of Donald are trying to slam on the brakes if only for financial reasons. The smart part of the Donald's personality knows he's not going to beat Hillary, and also knows that he's gotten as much exposure as possible from the campaign to date and things will get uglier once the national campaigns start -- so why put hundreds of millions more into the show when it's already served its purpose.
...But maybe I'm giving him too much credit.
I buy this completely. He's a show. Next time around Kim Khardashian will run. And I don't even know who that is!
-
So according to that article, you're racist skinheads, but just a little smarter?
Well, if you say so.
He's former/crayonz/hogboy style. Don't waste your energy.
-
Oh, my friend, there are so many tomes that have been written about this subject. If you have genuine interest and because you named yourself 'Observer' which suggests a scientific mind, then I will start you with this link: http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/
If the reading is too dry, let me know.
Proximity + Diversity = Conflict. We see it play out over and over again in American and Europe.
If I could populate the Earth from scratch, I definitely would give each race their own nation-state, if not continent. Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, Europe for the Europeans, etc.
However, thru bad public policy, the races have created multicultural societies to a great extent. Particularly in America.
So the question is now: what do we do from here?
Many of my colleagues have very hardcore solutions. Me, I prefer to focus on humane solutions around birthrates or secession. I mean, many of my colleagues refer to me as an SJW, and they may be right.
In any case, I would want America to look something like this:
Oh, you're a joke poster. Sorry I didn't realize you were a time waster. Thanks for the fun reading and carry on crayonz/Hog Boy.
-
This shouldn't have come as a surprise to some many of his supporters.
But I do have to give them credit for recognizing it before it's gotten to far for them.
That ship sailed.
-
No. I think whites are better at some things, worse at others. Only God can add it up and determine, on balance, which race is best.
However, I will definitely notice and point out the differences between races.
Truth be told, I think most people notice. It's only the pointing out that makes me different.
Do you think that races should have their own nation state? I apologize for my ignorance of the Spencer guy--only picking up what I read in some articles after you linked to him.
And what are the differences between the races?
-
The alt-right now has a wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right
So does the term 'cuckservative': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckservative
If Trump wins the nomination, I have to think Richard B. Spencer will get interviewed on CNN at some point, supercharging our movement.
For now, conservative journalists know about the alt-right, but they only talk about us on twitter.
You are a white supremacist?
-
The prevailing wind will never be to outlaw football or any youth sports. It's silly to think otherwise.
60 million kids ages 6-18 participate in organized sports. There were 24 sports related deaths over a 5 year period in high school sports participants (no other reliable data exists regarding those younger than in high school.
Another study showed that over a 40 year span, 46 college and pro level and 343 HS players lost their lives as a direct result of playing footbal
For kids under 9, concussions are most frequent with bicycling and on playgrounds (where a 7 year period recorded 40 deaths).
For ages 10-19, the most common association of concussions was football and bicycling for boys and soccer or biking.
In HS sports that both boys and girls play (soccer and basketball), girls sustain concussions at a higher rate than boys.
So do the politicians go after playgrounds and bikes, banishing them as well? They should, by your logic.
Well parroted but misses the big difference. When riding a bicycle or playing on a swing, a head injury is an accident. In football head blows are part of the game.
Headers in soccer area already becoming controversial. Some leagues don't allow them and some coaches/parents don't allow them.
If you don't think all a CTE linkage will catch up to youth football, you're nuts.
-
The point about cigarettes is that the vast majority of smokers will not die of cancer, just as the vast majority of kids will not develop any sequelae of your "repeated head bashing" hypeobole.
The individuals who will prevent the end of youth football are the parents who want their kids to play. The government will not be involved because no majority of politicians at the state or local level would ever vote to eliminate it--any more than they would ever ban the sale of cigarettes.
Politicians will blow whichever way there is a prevailing wind. They tax soda FFS!
"Repeated head bashing" is not hyperbole, it's football.
-
We can assume that all NFL players, if biopsied, have evidence of CTE--which at this point is a pathological diagnosis/finding. What seems obvious is that the vast majority of NFL players current or past, suffer no evidence of a neurological disease.
Or, look at the opposite, assume that only those rare few who do develop neurological disease are the ones with CTE evidence in the brain. In either case, the likelihood of any NFL player, let alone any of the 1000X more kids who played Pop Warner, of developing a debilitating disease is low.
Football for youths "won't be allowed"? By whom? The government? Of course not--they still allow the sale of cigarettes, which will kill far more people per year than sports related CTE.
The only thing that will end youth football are unaffordable insurance premiums paid by the youth leagues. Right now, it's too lucrative for the insurance companies to price out the leagues.
Occurence of CTE as "low" is not the standard for this. If you put kids at X times more risk for CTE by playing football, it's not going to be worth it.
Government, insurance, pick a group that can put an end to football.
Your cigarette argument supports my point. Cigarettes can only be bought by adults.
Don't underestimate motherment.
-
I'm not a republican, just passing on interesting articles.
I wasn't talking to you but the party that keeps this sort of nonsense up. Republicans should clean up their yard and not blame Trump on Democrats. If they had a better candidate, Trump would be long-since out of the picture.
-
The culture that created Donald Trump was liberal, not conservative: https://theintercept.com/2016/03/28/the-culture-that-created-donald-trump-was-liberal-not-conservative/
After all, it wasn’t some Klan newsletter that first brought Trump to our attention: It was Time and Esquire and Spy. The Westboro Baptist Church didn’t give him his own TV show: NBC did. And his boasts and lies weren’t posted on Breitbart, they were published by Random House. He was created by people who learned from Andy Warhol, not Jerry Falwell, who knew him from galas at the Met, not fundraisers at Karl Rove’s house, and his original audience was presented to him by Condé Nast, not Guns & Ammo. He owes his celebrity, his money, his arrogance, and his skill at drawing attention to those coastal cultural gatekeepers — presumably mostly liberal — who first elevated him out of general obscurity, making him famous and rewarding him (and, not at all incidentally, themselves) for his idiocies.
I've seen 2 variations of excuses that Republicans didn't create the Trump candidacy. The one you linked and the other that somehow Obama created Trump.
What a crock. Take responsibility and work to fix it instead of hiding behind others.
-
The point is not what would I or other parents choose, but that choice be allowed. Regardless, it has nothing at all to do with the NFL, where likely all players who reach that level will already have pathological evidence of CTE in their brains.
What I was saying is that allowing kids to bash their heads repeatedly is probably going to be a choice taken away from parents before long.
The studies now are not convincing at a statistical level (they are mostly only studying brains of footballers who already have CTE symptoms...thus they find CTE). That said, I'd put a high wager on a verified and credible study correlating football and CTE before long. The causal study will take more time but what's the point in encouraging kids to take blows to the head.
Play other sports where head blows are not built into the game. Sure you can still get bashed but it's not going to happen as part of regular play.
And though "Heads-up" helps, let's not kid ourselves: Football is violent and heads will get hit in football regardless of tackling technique.
All of the above from a HUGE football fan. But for kids, the day is coming when it won't be allowed.
-
False.
This board is a refutation of your position.
Gator is god. Tom and Jim are his high priests.
-
That's a parental decision, not related to what the NFL did or did not report in their concussion studies.
Should kids wait until college to play football? Or is it OK to play as a high school student? Where do you draw the line, and how do you decide for your kids?
It's a parent decision now but I suspect it won't be for long.
Deciding for your own kids should be easy.
Would you put a helmet on your son and hit them in the head 20 times a day for 3 months every fall?
-
Gator is the driving energy to most of the posts here. He is the god of PPP and most here worship at his temple.
-
No, I chose 10 rules that are basic to Christianity. From what I gather, Sharia Law is pretty basic to Islam. Why so much equivocation on your part?
Equivocation? Bullies use whatever tools they have at their disposal. Turns out men's mind get weak around religion so the books and rules of religion make for easy bully tools.
That's not a condemnation of religion. It's a condemnation of the people who use it to justify their bad acts. At the moment, the Islamic bully is on the upswing. In 300 years, someone will have taken its place. Thetan terror cells.
-
Why it it, "hits in football"?
Shouldn't it just be "hits to the head"?
If you get hit in the head, does it only cause CTE if it's done while playing football?
This article is about NFL football and it's not just hits to the head that cause the brain to rattle.
Brain trauma can happen in any sport but there's nothing like football.
The argument that grown-ups can do what they want is right on--the issue, and it's a big one--is that kids shouldn't play football.
-
This is why trading down for MORE picks is a good strategy. The draft is a lottery in a lot ways. Getting more balls in the hopper is always worth it. See New England's strategy for the last 15 years. Always stockpiling later picks. Some miss, some don't. But they have more picks so get more hits.
-
Gaurdian stupid headline lede: "Company finally apologizes."
Yes, sorry world, MS took a day to apologize that their AI got more or less vandalized by some douchebags.
-
I'm truly having a problem here. I liken the Quran to the Bible and Sharia Law to the Ten Commandants. How could I call myself a Christian if I didn't believe in the Ten Commandants?
You picked 10 rules you liked but ignored a bunch of other Biblical rules you don't. The Bible is no picnic if you try to follow it literally. It's just that over time, most people ignore the bad parts.
Bad Christians could manipulate the Biblical teachings to suit their needs (and have) in the same way bad Islamists can (and do). Both books are just words that can be manipulated to suit any bully's purpose.
Jesus...people follow scientology FFS, and it's just another book like the Bible or Quaran.
-
She'll probably get the necessary # of delegates, but Democratic primary voters/caucus goers are clearly not excited to nominate Hillary.
The real trick will be the superdelegates. Not all of those committed to Clinton voted for her last time around. If they really want to screw her, they can change their votes. Dem voters can make life really uncomfortable for the superdelegate folks if Clinton can't wrap up the regular delegates.
With a lot of the South already covered in the primaries, Sanders will make a strong push through the more liberal states and midwest. Clinton may not be a secure as she would have people believe and the Sanders people know that well.
-
Ideologically, Sanders is the furthest from me.
And yet as a person, he's by far the one with the highest integrity and likability. Too bad he isn't more centrist.
I wonder what a battle between him and Trump would look like.
Do We Have Any Bernie Sanders Supporters Among Us?
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Bow down before the one you serve.