Max Fischer

A right wing propagandist citing "internet reports," brilliant. I hope they produce more evidence how Hillary murdered Vince Foster.

You are a coward. Can't even honestly answer a question. (You mean the right for women to control their own bodies without government interference? It's libertarian, not that Right really believes in those principles.)

Coward.

You seem to be particularly upset but I can't tell why.

360 is great but the game is on ESPN

Any particular reason you target "America's inner cities?"

I don't know anyone who is "pro-abortion." Is that some kind of cult, like those who follow Glenn Beck?

I'm not saying he's unAmerican, but many find it curious that he has not denied possible traitorous behavior and yet to address unasked questions about his patriotism.

What does that even mean? I highly doubt he pays more taxes than I do. No matter, the responses here prove the point of this entire thread.

Touchy. Dude, I don't know anything about you and I don't want to. But you do make me laugh. What's especially funny is that you don't even get the joke. (By the way, I think there is a very good chance I pay twice as much in taxes than you. Not that it would matter in your narrow world). Oh, and I don't get the Two and half men reference. Never saw the show.

This coming from a guy who won't deny he spends 24/7 in his basement covered in Cheetos posting on the internet.

Are you drunk?

I won't know or care. I mute the TV when that awful song comes on. Only thing worse is the Kenny Chesney crap for the college games.

So . . . come again?

Uh, fanatical much?

Yeah, but that still makes them "uninsured" regardless if they "choose" to be.

Exactly right. And guess who pays for uninsured health care right now? Why would anyone have a problem with this plan?

So . . . if no one is complaining then Title IX is probably a widely accepted and well crafted law. Thanks for making my point.

That is a bit of an overstatement. The difficulty in repealing a law usually doesn't stop public discussion on whether a law should be changed. (I have to say I have not had one conversation about the merits of the law in over 20 years.) Could it be that Americans it difficult to justify its repeal, simply believe it was the right thing to do or there isn't solid legal grounds to overturn?

Nearly every Republican in the Senate (and Ronald Reagan) would disagree with you.

Can you explain why there isn't a call for its repeal? Is it because Americans are entirely satisfied with the (IMO, outstanding) results or are the opponents simply cowards?

Pitt is a very good actor.

Max Fischer = height, weight of Steve Tasker. Where's my contract?

Saw it on Comcast rental. Good flick.

Typical "debate." WH puts out a summary of the objectives and the moron patrol complains about "spam." Nice response.