Max Fischer

Oh, please. You'd jump on that in a heartbeat.

It's doubtful many on this board would reject any one of them.

No one is more thrilled by the Bills current success, but I'm concerned more than a few wall posters have lost sight of our recent history, and for lack of a better description, have lost some perspective. If we were to visit other message boards and read half the comments and topics they would laugh out loud. Therefore, to help with message topics going forward I suggest the following: When will the league step in and simply give the trophy to the Bills? Fitzpatrick: Great QB or the Greatest QB? How long before the Bills cure cancer? Does Fred Jackson remind you more of James Bond or Jason Borne? Will the Bills beat Cincy by 35 points or one million? Do you think Ralph Wilson will live long enough to hoist the trophy next January? I'm pissed the Bills will not massively overpay Fitz, Jackson and whoever plays right tackle.

Yeah, no more than 50% of Stadium Wall posters would ever say something like this . . .

I guess there wasn't much competition.

SF - vs SEA - W 33-17 (209 total yards) vs DAL - L 25-27 (206 total yards) at CIN - W 13-8 (226 total yards) DEN vs OAK - L 20-23 (310 total yards) vs CIN - W 24-22 (318 total yards) at TEN - L 14-17 (231 total yards) CLE vs CIN - L 17-27 (285 total yards) at IND - W 27-19 (303 total yards) vs MIA - W 17-16 (280 total yards) It's only three games, and the numbers are a mixed bag. Opponents seem to average the same number total yards versus other opponents, but points vary. Moreover, I do not know if there were defensive or very short yardage scores. Overall, it's difficult to argue that the Cincy defense performed any better than other opponents.

It would be more useful to examine how Denver, SF and the Browns played against other defenses.

Thanks for the link, but it's probably statistically irrelevant until at least Week 5.

Well done. My favorite is the TD with Fitz in the background.

Well said. These nonsensical posts only take away from the win, while making Bills fans look small and uninformed.

You mean, "The Pats should have put Brady in sooner."

Oh, God. If the Bills win, what recipe should Fitzpatrick make in Good Housekeeping?

That analysis made more sense than what normally hear.

Oh God.

8-8 is much more realistic. 9-7 possible but just as likely to be 7-9 (which I'd take).

You shouldn't post on a school night. Back to bed. If Fitz did this, you'd praise him for being a badass.

Good Coaching + head games = Motivation & Focus

I like Fitz, Bell and Johnson. But please do not put them in the same sentence as Kelly, Fina and Reed.

He could be right.

Your whining will make more sense if the Bills win.

Agree. Only need for two-point conversion. There is something lame about winning/losing a game on an extra-point.

Overall, a mostly fair analysis -- you made some good observations but speculation may not be your strong suit. I see little to support your assertion that "Nix is stubborn about his own players (i.e., Davis) and we will suffer the consequences this year" nor is there any evidence they will cut McGee. The Johnny White comment is also a bit off-base. White might not contribute much, but he didn't have much chance out there.

I cannot think of a sane reason why Cincy OR Bills would do that. This scenario assumes the Bengals would only trade for a player worthy of the price, which then indicates that IF said player is worthy of the price the Bengals would win more games, thus taking draft slot out of the #1 (aka Luck) position. No winners in that trade.

I clicked on this thread to find out how people could watch more than two episodes of IRT. I've had more dramatic rides home in the snow.

Rushmore Office Space The Naked Gun