Max Fischer

Thanks again for telling me what I think. I'll be back with you If I can't decide what I want for breakfast.

Yes, we can certainly agree on Tantaros, but I have a feeling I would need to keep the TV on Mute. But seriously, you watch Ed Shultz? I can't watch MSNBC after Morning Joe and The Daily Rundown. I had to look up the "Young Turks" . . . and couldn't even tell you how to find Current TV. Most of the TV "news" programs are complete crap.

It's just a fact that conservatives consistently oppose alternative fuels research and development; and continually attack any investment on the campaign trail. It's a knee-jerk reaction. Yes, your Fox News talking points are right on Solyndra (yes, it failed), but the GOP is ALWAYS picking "winners and losers" in government funding, tax incentives, programs, etc. Try as you might, but that is not a partisan concept unique to Democrats. Your talking points suggest you favor some kind of "free market" but it has rarely been that way for either party in control. And, last, Ethanol is only considered a failure of conservative talk-show hosts. Funny how the GOP has never truly tried to get rid of it. Until proven otherwise, I believe ethanol could be a part of the overall energy solution that would include oil, gas, wind, water, bio fuels, etc. There is no one solution, and it would help if the right was a bit more productive in the finding a solution and the crazy left didn't rely on utopian ideas. We can always count on you to "know" what other people think. (Hint: you are not even close).

I find it amazing that conservatives latch onto every report on the demise of alternative fuels. It's almost gleeful. Ethanol is far from a bust and the electric vehicle is still in its infancy. Why so quick to dismiss the overall goals of conservation, etc? Why are conservatives resistant to researching viable alternatives. Why do conservative view this as a "liberal" thing? I just don't get that attitude, it makes zero sense.

Sorry, I should have realized you can't resist showing how smart your are. But if you couldn't read between the lines: the Middle East, Russia, etc.

To me, it's about shaking off our dependence on foreign oil.

Jobs numbers are positive and you guys are upset? When did job losses start? Can't remember.

We'll put you down as "undecided."

A video that "surfaced" on Fox News in 2007.

Yes, exactly. (Yes, I am agreeing with you).

Aren't the polls skewed? Oh, only when Romeny isn't doing as well? Now I get the methodology. Can't wait for the post-election "voter fraud" excuse.

What part don't you get about American politics?

Seek professional help. Step away from your talk radio. I think you're on to something. Who would have thought that Obama would be deeply unpopular in deep, rural Pennsylvania? I will seriously question the results of this election if Obama could pull it out in PA.

You guys are nuts. If you don't believe the reported polls, then I guess the GOP pollsters are in on the conspiracy. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81845.html?hp=t1 This is no different than 2004 when my Democratic friends insisited John Kerry would win. Polls suggested otherwise and like 2008, the polls were nearly dead-on. In other words, grow up.

How do you guys get through life thinking everything is a conspiracy? Wow, shocking that certain states have declining percentage of registrations with some in swing states. Effects Ds and Rs. Dems in rust belt though trend of Latino voters could eventually be a huge problem for GOP. None of this is a secret.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/29/poll-averages-have-no-history-of-consistent-partisan-bias/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/419556/september-27-2012/-skewed--presidential-polls

You seem to think losing is pretty funny. Good luck with your fantasy world - while it lasts.

So, tell me again why Blacks and LGBT vote Democrat and the Rich vote Republican? How are they not "normal?" Why won't Republican states just get rid of welfare and medicaid?

Good analysis. Only bad presidents like Reagan and Clinton used the teleprompter as often. We need good presidents that GW Bush who looked like a buffoon on the teleprompter and had to use index cards.

Have you figured out why the polls are wrong?

No doubt the new anti-ref push start on talk radio. Good luck with that.

This is why I rarely listen to sports radio. Embarrassing and lame.

If a only the Bills had a GM that made good picks.

It's a sin to compare Marv Levy to Isiah Thomas in any way, other than they both worked in sports.