Why do so many fans rail against the moves by distorting basic facts?
Gilmore - We've seen the good SG and the terrible; but certainly you can make a logical argument he was not worth the contract he signed. (Would you have signed him? I know I wouldn't at that price)) At the very least, SG might not fit in the current defense and we have yet to see TW play a single regular season down. A strong case could be made for "Let's see how it goes," but TW is hardly "very little."
Watkins - Same for Watkins, this board and other places has debated ad nauseam about the deal, but Jordan Mathews is no doubt as productive, if not more productive than SW. Perhaps not as dynamic, but over his career, no doubt a much better asset. At worse, this one is a wash.
Woods - Oh, please. A good, average player. Did you really want to sign him for what he got? We'll see, but I feel pretty confident that Zay Jones will more than fill Woods shoes.
Ragland- Really? The guy may not see the field this year.
Darby - Again we'll see, but Darby does not fit this defense and time will tell if his replacement is a bit more than you think.
J. Williams - He's an average RB. Tolbert et al have already demonstrated they are as good. JW may not even play this year.