Max Fischer

Damn Capitalists . . .

Higher than a potential US civil war? I'll give GWB the benefit of the doubt, he's better than those guys but the its a very short list after that.

That's stupid, no one would write "aagggh" when dying . . .

Read, "Butterworth's Guide to Coaching Kids."

Or even fewer people believe the world is flat . . .

The level of American political analysis and discourse has hit a new low.

That's this week's most pathetic criticism. Geez Louise. Do a simple google search and you'll find many pictures of Reagan, Bush I, JFK, LBJ, Nixon and Ike with their hands in their pockets. Is this the new "terrorist fist pump?"

Uh, right . . . .

Yeah, but if by 10 she unquestionably believes in an invisible, all-knowing being that may or may not grant wishes who had presented all the rules to strictly live by to a largely illiterate world over 2000 years ago you'll be an even better parent.

Extreme straw man arguments are never used here.

Inherit the Wind is a great play/movie.

Are you suggesting that exposure to religion will keep her off drugs, alcohol, she won't get pregnant or become a Scientologist?

Well, NYT does have a point that McCain's reads more like a "trash Obama" than a "this is my plan" piece - and it shouldn't take more than a few hours for McCain to submit his piece. Oh, the "fairness doctrine" has nothing to do with it.

Good deal for Miami, Redskins and Bills.

What's the over/under that he's subject of a ESPN/Hallmark/Lifetime "Movie of the Week" in two years?

I see Obama goes to church and he's a muslim. What a flip-flopper. What did you think of the article? Even when told flat out that rumors weren't true they continue to believe. A fact checking couldn't hurt

Yep, pretty much. Flag City, USA My neighbors kid (13 years old) said her parents won't vote for Obama because "his religion teaches black people to hate white people." Gee, I wonder where they'd get that idea?"

Good. He should take Dick Vitale with him.

Perhaps a bit late, but the first step is to admit you have a problem.

Really? Is that what I was saying? No, of course not (but you knew that already, next time try to avoid the classic straw man technique, it's a bit lazy). However, you do hit the nail on the head when you say: "Military force is one option among many, and the costs will vary with the situation." If you, too, believe that is the wisest course how would you respond to attacks on Obama that such a stance is tantamount to "appeasement?"

I just curious why you don't answer simple questions. You're so adamant about your viewpoints I would think it would be easy.

Why come on a political forum if you don't want to answer simple questions? What are you afraid of?

I'm in fights every day and rarely fight the same exact way. How would you answer Obama's critics who call him an appeaser for suggesting we fight different ways?

Do these questions frighten you?

But isn't it true that Iraq was far behind where Iran and North Korea (and possibly several other "bad" nations) are right now?