Max Fischer

The most inane post of the week. Which is saying a lot. This just in: the earth isn't flat and the moon isn't made of cheese.

Because the corporate tax rate is a farce. Republicans and corporate execs complain about the high tax that very few actually pay. Middle-class taxpayers don't have the an army of accountants and loopholes to do the same.

Are you purposely distorting the facts or just don't know any better? Why did you insert " [barney, Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee] " in that sentence? You do know the Republicans controlled Congress from 1995 to 2006, right? And you do know Republicans have controlled the Presidency since 2001? So how is this Frank's fault when he didn't take over until 2007? Why make it look like he controlled the committee?

Last time I checked, Paulson worked at the will of GWB.

Maybe you should have a working knowledge of how things really work.

Nice speech, Rush. Poor GW Bush, 6 years of a GOP congress and he could do nothing. Now he's near impotent with a 1 and half year old Dem congress. If only the US presidency had any power. If only it was a bully pulpit. If only he could make appointments. If only it controlled the levers of every department.

"Huge stretch" doesn't even begin to troll the depths of your paranoia.

You do know that Bush is President, no? Has been for nearly eight years. What next, blame this on Clinton?

DeMint: " . . . return to a free enterprise economy . . ." Uh, like when? Myth #2876.

You and others toss around "socialism" pretty easily. It's like the far left throwing around "fascism," which makes them ignorant cartoon as well.

How often can they let TO go one-on-one before the Iggles make a change?

No question. He !@#$ up. Deserves a suspension.

Almost took off his head but apparently not "good" enough.

Almost took off his head but apparently not "good" enough.

That's easy: Ditka.

Kiffin is unpopular. What's worse, Ryan is well-liked. I think this will come as a relief to Oakland.

Ryan is well-liked while Kiffin lost the team a while ago. I would rather they waited a week.

I see the Pats "in" until they're "out."

Not a poem. The Foo Fighters. Well done.

Since when is this about you?

I wanted the Jets to win. Better to kill, quarter and bury the King as soon as possible.

Yeah, so? I just find it amusing that predicting a 10-6 Pats record was blasphemy and treasonous last week. Now the responses are "of course they are." What a difference a week makes. (in fact, the thread was closed due to flared tempers).

Max Fischer post Sep 7 2008, 08:27 PM Post #1 2 - That said. This is a team that nearly went 19-0 last year. 19 and frickin' zero. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised they will game plan and rally to a 10-6 or 11-5 record AND beat the Bills at home. Say what you want, but the Pats are a damn good team and Billy B is a great coach. Don't book your flight to a division championship just yet. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- == I brought this up last week. Granted Jets are not that good - but still - if the Pats (likely) beat Miami their 3-0. I think they beat Miami again and Jets at home - that's 5 wins. I say they win can win 5 of the remaining 11 for 10 wins (including Bills at home). Therefore I think Bills need 10 wins with tiebreaker or 11 wins to win outright. No matter how you look at Pats are an above .500 team.

Give some credit to a very good Jax D at home.

Dude, you sound like an ass. What next, Amos and Andy impressions?