Shamrock

I'm not sure if what you've proposed makes sense? Another team's backup WR goes down making them short on WR. We offer them one of our WR's (whom we'll most likely cut) for one of their other position guys, or perhaps say a draft pick...next year or something to help them with camp depth in preseason? I gather that the position guy we're after is a backup as well- as surely the value of a WR after #3 on depth chart isn't equivalent to a starter on the line? Just not sure if any of the proposed receivers we're offering is worthy of say a starting lineman or say NT from another team...now if 4 receivers go down...we're talking The waiver wire is a different scenario, but look at how Price did in Dallas last year- inspite of what he's showing with a full camp so far...

Us Podiatrists often refer to ourselves as Pod's. Maybe it's just 1 podiatrist- hey that aint fare...i have to go to a game with another podiatrist... c'mon...

Hey, i'm trying to figure this out... Your brother's wife is your sister-in-law. Her cousin's sister is also her cousin. Her cousin's niece is your 2nd cousin. Her mother would be also a cousin...now this is where it gets strange. The cousin married a woman, but is a woman. Her sister would be your cousin. The father an Uncle in-law, the same for their brother... Hmmm I don't know if this source is reliable and i've got a headache..

ummm, kangaroo anyone?

Seems your sources are deeper within than Soprano's then...

Yeah, but there were reservations about your bench numbers not stacking up and you didn't participate in the shuttle run or the vertical leap. That said, some sites had you in the 3,601st round, which means we "reached" for you in the 3,557th round...

...but funny response...

Willis. No way LT was I disrespectin' babymommas. No way man.

"nasty"...that's a funny story though.

...i'm feeling this way inclined to.

thanks for the "interview". It is appreciated.

Replithentic...meaining we found some old, retired players (Reed and Tasker) jersey's and we need the warehoues space, so we made up a word to flog 'em off to diehard fans. Geez, $125 US for a "replithentic" top...

Playing tackle in the NFL is also a dangerous health issus...

Say hi to #89 for me... hope she was wearing appropriate shoes

I love this site...

Thanks for these tid bits. From today: The DT competition in favour of Williams or Anderson? How was Denney? Cooper the keeper from the "other" DE's (or Gandy needs improvement?) How did Kelsay do with the shift? Any 11-11 with both Tripps and Pants together? Keep the reports coming. Thanks

...can we do a 5 1/2 year deal...

Thanks for that. From others analysis at camp, Denney appears in darker pencil than Kelsay at the moment (not quite pen, but harder to rub out ). Kelsay looks sharp in the photos- almost a twin of Schobel. I guess he'll be the swing man, spelling both Denney and Schobel at times, not the designated rusher though. It's the 4th spot that's interesting. I haven't read a lot from camp about how they're doing. There's some confidence there, which is great. I wonder if there's more Grant Irons in the bunch than an unploished gem waiting to be found. I'd like to hear more feedback of the front 4 competition, if anyone's reading this who's going to camp... I think the tackle spot is a little more steadfast, with McCargo, Triplett, Anderson and Williams as suggested. Williams has gotten some positive comments, about his strength- well, it is camp, we thought Bannan was strong too . I guess the battle there is in the anchor position, at the nose. McCargo played some in college, but Williams and Anderson will battle that out. McCargo filling the 3 technique, behind Triplett and sharing some time in certain downs...as widely reported. So, i guess i'm asking for those at camp, as interesting as Holcomb v Losman is, can you post a bit more depth of the D-line battles too...please...

He kept on going though

...you've been chatting with Soprano again?

I emailed him awhile back. He may be up a roof somewhere. Buddy's sure is demanding.

Thanks for the information. Every little bit helps you feel a bit closer (than the Pacific Ocean at least ) It'll be interesting to see how the DE situation develops. Both Schobel and Kelsay look sharp. Perhaps Kelsay is being groomed more as a situational rusher and a back up to Schobel. Denney as the anchor at LDE, as perhaps as ol' whitey intended with moving up in the draft to take him as a Hansen replacement. Thanks for the reports. Keep them coming...

How do the other TE's look- Cieslak, Everett and Neufeld? From what I can see in the Pics, Kelsay looks a lot sharper than last year- i know they've asked him to drop weight, do you think he's quicker? He looks more like Schobel now. Possey played any line yet? Thanks M

hahhahahaha