SectionC3

You could always give it back if you’re so adamantly against socialism. Same thing with the whining about inflation. That’s a function of capitalism, whether MAGA wants to admit it or not. Personally, I think price caps are a bad idea. But both sides are trending toward greater government involvement in the economy in the context of the inflation conversation. Hoax. Also, no eye roll this time from Tommy Eyerolls? Maybe you’re one of the ones on welfare and this point hit a little too close to home.

Oddly your views are how I feel about MAGA. Pretty much hits it on the head. There’s probably more white people (the “poor whites,” as Dave Chappelle calls them) receiving public benefits than any other demographic. Quit whining about insulin and Mexicans taking the jobs that you can’t or won’t do anyways, get off the couch, and get to work. It’s not the government’s fault they’re losers.

Nail Head and blunt object have collided. The rallies are sad. They’re largely a bunch of weird people who find solace in one another and in the frustration with, in significant part, their own failings. And the leader of this lot is a past his prime old man who is beginning to realize that he’s been tuned out.

And if your business failed, or if you invested poorly, where would you be? Welfare? Living at your kids’ house? Social security is designed to prevent that. I question the investment acumen and work ethic of much of MAGA. Maybe they can take care of each other if social security goes away. But right now I’d rather have a program that allows them to afford their own trailer, video games, and booze in their golden years.

That’s all he has left. Playing the greatest hits. Hillary, Biden, being the DJ at mar a lago. That’s all he has left. He’s just a washed up weirdo playing out one last con.

Because even no policy, were it the case, is better than January 6.

I agree that Trubisky was brutal against the Steelers. But let's start here. Does anyone have a better, reasonable idea right now? I'll hear Heinecke. I guess I'll listen to Josh Dobbs. But where are we otherwise?

Hoax. "Every worker got a tax break." But the rich folks got more. Way, way more. Which is what happens in the supply side system that you vote for. By definition, most corporations are not Fortune 500. Yet they got breaks that, in theory, could have gone to the worker. More supply side. Keep voting against your own interests. Also, it's "you're," not "your." Maybe instead of doing the eye roll thing you can peruse a copy of Strunk & White.

I don't disagree. And yet you vote for Trump. Tax cuts for the wealthy! Corporate tax breaks! Raise prices on consumers! All your guy. Keep voting against your own interest. Who is that exactly? Also, I don't need social security. Not a dime of it. But most of the people who read this probably do. And, what appears to be your point about privatizing social security was discussed up until about 9/11. At that point even Republicans realized that market volatility made that privatization idea a bad plan. So, bottom line, you don't believe in Social Security. But you're not going to renounce it. And you're not giving back Medicare benefits. So either you're not a principled person, or you partake in benefits of programs grounded in elements of socialism.

You mean trickle down, right? That's sort of the point. Historically the Republican economic approach has been trickle down. GHWB called it "voodoo economics." Trump is a Populist in many ways, but his economic theory has trickle down components. The large tax cut for the rich, for example, is one of them. The tax hike on imports, stupid as it may be, probably is another. Trickle down doesn't work, but now the working folks who support Trump are voting for it. The joke's on you if he wins.

My favorite is that you're giving back your social security and Medicare benefits because you're against socialism. You should let everyone else here know how to do that so that the "anti-commies" can do the same. Weird.

The bull rush did seem to be effective tonight.

I thought the same thing last night. Why keep 6? None of the potential bottom of the group players is going to get claimed. And, I have a sneaking suspicion we're going to run a lot of 12 this year. So I'm skeptical that we need more than 5. Maybe the dynamic changes if there's a trade available, or if there's somebody they really like who hits the transaction wire at the end of the month. And he didn't blow contain like Jonathon. I still think Jonathon makes the team if they keep 10 DL. But Solomon has passed him.

So do you care? Let’s start there.

Tommy Eyerolls whines about the government not doing enough about inflation. Someone does something that Tommy Eyerolls seems to want. Then Tommy Eyerolls calls them a commie. So, Tommy Eyerolls, what is your plan for dealing with inflation?

Let’s hear about your training and theories. Maybe you can teach us all.

But the person who did all those things, with the exception of the cigar, is your nominee. I realize that you cooked your brain with HCQ, but surely even in your diminished state you comprehend the difference.

Get off the couch and go rake a forest. And get you complain about inflation and prices. Commie.

Weird.

Conventional medical wisdom?

Yup. I’m sure of my doubt. Much better than doubting that I’m sure.

Why? HCQ and ivermectin should knock that thing right out. I doubt you’re a candidate for it, that’s for sure.

If that's the case then you should have shut it down a long time ago. You too. Especially you.

Also he's very weird. Don't forget weird.

And yet she's on pace to win. Which should tell everyone something about the "quality" of your candidate. Harris has the momentum. She's also got the right message, she's not overplaying (or playing) the gender card), and she's a breath of fresh air relative to the doddering fool running against her and the obviously past-his-prime president. Turnout is going to be key, as is turn-off, which seems to happen frequently with Trump.