SectionC3

I don't disagree. And yet you vote for Trump. Tax cuts for the wealthy! Corporate tax breaks! Raise prices on consumers! All your guy. Keep voting against your own interest. Who is that exactly? Also, I don't need social security. Not a dime of it. But most of the people who read this probably do. And, what appears to be your point about privatizing social security was discussed up until about 9/11. At that point even Republicans realized that market volatility made that privatization idea a bad plan. So, bottom line, you don't believe in Social Security. But you're not going to renounce it. And you're not giving back Medicare benefits. So either you're not a principled person, or you partake in benefits of programs grounded in elements of socialism.

You mean trickle down, right? That's sort of the point. Historically the Republican economic approach has been trickle down. GHWB called it "voodoo economics." Trump is a Populist in many ways, but his economic theory has trickle down components. The large tax cut for the rich, for example, is one of them. The tax hike on imports, stupid as it may be, probably is another. Trickle down doesn't work, but now the working folks who support Trump are voting for it. The joke's on you if he wins.

My favorite is that you're giving back your social security and Medicare benefits because you're against socialism. You should let everyone else here know how to do that so that the "anti-commies" can do the same. Weird.

The bull rush did seem to be effective tonight.

I thought the same thing last night. Why keep 6? None of the potential bottom of the group players is going to get claimed. And, I have a sneaking suspicion we're going to run a lot of 12 this year. So I'm skeptical that we need more than 5. Maybe the dynamic changes if there's a trade available, or if there's somebody they really like who hits the transaction wire at the end of the month. And he didn't blow contain like Jonathon. I still think Jonathon makes the team if they keep 10 DL. But Solomon has passed him.

So do you care? Let’s start there.

Tommy Eyerolls whines about the government not doing enough about inflation. Someone does something that Tommy Eyerolls seems to want. Then Tommy Eyerolls calls them a commie. So, Tommy Eyerolls, what is your plan for dealing with inflation?

Let’s hear about your training and theories. Maybe you can teach us all.

But the person who did all those things, with the exception of the cigar, is your nominee. I realize that you cooked your brain with HCQ, but surely even in your diminished state you comprehend the difference.

Get off the couch and go rake a forest. And get you complain about inflation and prices. Commie.

Weird.

Conventional medical wisdom?

Yup. I’m sure of my doubt. Much better than doubting that I’m sure.

Why? HCQ and ivermectin should knock that thing right out. I doubt you’re a candidate for it, that’s for sure.

If that's the case then you should have shut it down a long time ago. You too. Especially you.

Also he's very weird. Don't forget weird.

And yet she's on pace to win. Which should tell everyone something about the "quality" of your candidate. Harris has the momentum. She's also got the right message, she's not overplaying (or playing) the gender card), and she's a breath of fresh air relative to the doddering fool running against her and the obviously past-his-prime president. Turnout is going to be key, as is turn-off, which seems to happen frequently with Trump.

This is an interesting post. I have no idea what it means to be a conservative in the Trump era. I don't think modern-day "conservatives" have a clue, either. One would think that January 6 would have caused traditional "conservatives" to turn away from Trump. They're quick to lob the "socialist" euphemism, while at the same time supporting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid and book banning. It's the height of hypocrisy.

Diggs did break free for that Josh dime on the shot play it took the whole game to set up against KC … and we all know what happened next. But the truth is if Sherfield doesn’t suck so much (think drop on mid to deep ball on visitors side tunnel end zone) in that game maybe diggs’s sucking doesn’t matter.

It wasn’t good last year, either. Diggs sucked the second half of the year, Sheffield was brutal, and Davis was somewhere in between. Kicking the tires on Corey does no harm. The reality is that there’s a good chance WR6 isn’t on the roster now. In any event, if we’re getting our best players on the field, would anyone be surprised if we run an awful lot of 12 personnel this year?

Josh Allen got him in the ravens opener. Rag dolled him. Great stuff.

Charming as usual. Hoax. Go back to the couch. I know a lot of dumb lawyers. Believe me. She might not be brilliant, but she’s not dumb.

Fake news.

Hoax.

If that ever actually happens then please do let us know. Probably not because nobody outside of the bubble is going to listen.