SectionC3

Hoax. I read your case. It considers charging discretion, which is immaterial here inasmuch as Flynn has pleaded guilty. Also, it occurred to me that you’re the coward here. Once I sniffed out your attempt to leave room for yourself to weasel out of obligation when Flynn is sentenced, you resorted to your usual tack of name-calling, obfuscation, and insults. Sad!

Any time you’d like to stop name-calling and start putting your crack legal mind to work is find with me.

Nope. You want to bet. You proposed terms. I will not accept your terms because they will allow you to continue to pollute this environment if the “case is not dismissed with prejudice.” Since that can never happen — it is not the case that would be dismissed with prejudice — there is no sense in taking the bet. If you’d like to put your crack legal mind to work and draft better terms, then I’ll listen to what you have to say.

Still haven’t figured out that a CASE doesn’t get dismissed with prejudice, have you?

Again, poorly drawn. Go back and figure out what might be dismissed with prejudice (hint: it’s not the case) and then we can talk again.

So if Flynn gets sentenced you go on vacation for a year? Done. Your terms are vague and poorly drawn, and I note that they include an escape hatch that would allow you to win the bet that you have proposed if Trump pardons Flynn. Apparently you are not confident that Flynn will prevail on the law here.

Me too. This Q fellow is starting to piss me off. I’ve had enough of his disrespect for the Anons.

Got any other hot tips about the “case record” to share today? Or maybe you can regale us with tales of your hoaxy logic about how a declaration is the same as withdrawing a plea. Or, better yet, explain again how a case about charging discretion is deciding case law with respect to the prosecutorial abandonment issue in the Flynn case. Keep the hits coming, my man! That’s right. We all need to know the difference between Qs and Anons. It is the path to enlightenment. Thank you, sir.

Whose practice went so well that she is . . . A journalist!

Says the journalist. Hoax! How would that help in my effort to Keep Making America Great Keep Make Again? I beg you, sir, please help me understand whether we are Again Making America Great Again or if we’re focused on Keeping America Great now.

So it’s Made in America? I don’t follow. I’’m not sure if I should focus on Again Making America Great Again or on Keeping America Great. Please help!

Not in the least. But I’m glad that you finally came to terms with the fact that you have a wine cork. Now the healing can begin!

Hey, at least he didn’t bring a wine cork to a sword fight. Unlike someone else here.

But the virus has been reduced to ashes!

Another fake conspiracy theory to distract the 38% of Americans who believe that a pandemic, racial injustice, depression-era unemployment numbers, and climate change are great! Keep America Great! Or is it Make America Great Again again? I can’t remember. Maybe its Again Make America Keep Great. Can you clear this up for me?

Hoax. That’s not remotely close to what I said. The perjury identified by Gleeson can be considered at sentencing if that uncharged and therefore unproven crime is not used to elevate the sentence imposed with respect to the crime of which Flynn was convicted beyond the presently-existing sentencing range for that crime. Read a case called Apprendi (a predecessor to the case cited by the alt-wrong lawyer Deranged Rhino referenced earlier in this thread). This morning he reduced coronavirus to ashes*! *Except for in Arizona and Texas and the other places where rates of infection are soaring. Nice! A case about charging discretion. Unfortunately for Mr. Flynn we have a conviction here, meaning that there is no issue of charging discretion. Justice, 1. Deranged Rhino, 0.

Hoax. Read the article. Gleeson alleged that Flynn perjured himself in moving to withdraw the plea. Have a nice day! that’s not very nice, sir. More comments like that will get you in a list. Please take a friendlier time in your discussion.

So ... Gleason gave the judge cover. Powell is mouthing off. Bad look. Flynn is likely going to get sentenced. Whether he sees a day in prison is uncertain bc he might get a stay. But not a good day for Flynn.

Hoax. As usual. https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/502066-court-appointed-former-judge-accuses-flynn-of-perjury-urges-court-to%3famp almost as unbelievable as a bunch of trump appointees trying to rig the justice system for Flynn!

Looks like Gordo messed up her Apprendi analysis here. The unconvicted crime (here, perjury) can be considered in determining where within a permissible range a sentence should fall. It can’t be used to enhance a sentence beyond its permissible maximum term. But I’m sure legal savants Psycho Rhino and Buffalo Gal knew that! Apprendi was decided in 2000, Gordo!

You’re right, I should read your “deciding case law.”

Apparently the boring nature of the work gave you time to hatch some of your nonsense conspiracy theories and invent such gems as “case records” and “deciding case law.” Well done, sir!

“Deciding case law!” Outstanding. Now I’ve heard two novel things today! Keep it up!

Got any more case law for me, Mr. Dershowitz? I can’t wait to see it! Better yet, get it to Flynn’s counsel ASAP. They need you! Is that where you came up with the “case record” phrase? That one was rich!

Flynn admitted it! Outstanding!