SectionC3

Another fake conspiracy theory to distract the 38% of Americans who believe that a pandemic, racial injustice, depression-era unemployment numbers, and climate change are great! Keep America Great! Or is it Make America Great Again again? I can’t remember. Maybe its Again Make America Keep Great. Can you clear this up for me?

Hoax. That’s not remotely close to what I said. The perjury identified by Gleeson can be considered at sentencing if that uncharged and therefore unproven crime is not used to elevate the sentence imposed with respect to the crime of which Flynn was convicted beyond the presently-existing sentencing range for that crime. Read a case called Apprendi (a predecessor to the case cited by the alt-wrong lawyer Deranged Rhino referenced earlier in this thread). This morning he reduced coronavirus to ashes*! *Except for in Arizona and Texas and the other places where rates of infection are soaring. Nice! A case about charging discretion. Unfortunately for Mr. Flynn we have a conviction here, meaning that there is no issue of charging discretion. Justice, 1. Deranged Rhino, 0.

Hoax. Read the article. Gleeson alleged that Flynn perjured himself in moving to withdraw the plea. Have a nice day! that’s not very nice, sir. More comments like that will get you in a list. Please take a friendlier time in your discussion.

So ... Gleason gave the judge cover. Powell is mouthing off. Bad look. Flynn is likely going to get sentenced. Whether he sees a day in prison is uncertain bc he might get a stay. But not a good day for Flynn.

Hoax. As usual. https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/502066-court-appointed-former-judge-accuses-flynn-of-perjury-urges-court-to%3famp almost as unbelievable as a bunch of trump appointees trying to rig the justice system for Flynn!

Looks like Gordo messed up her Apprendi analysis here. The unconvicted crime (here, perjury) can be considered in determining where within a permissible range a sentence should fall. It can’t be used to enhance a sentence beyond its permissible maximum term. But I’m sure legal savants Psycho Rhino and Buffalo Gal knew that! Apprendi was decided in 2000, Gordo!

You’re right, I should read your “deciding case law.”

Apparently the boring nature of the work gave you time to hatch some of your nonsense conspiracy theories and invent such gems as “case records” and “deciding case law.” Well done, sir!

“Deciding case law!” Outstanding. Now I’ve heard two novel things today! Keep it up!

Got any more case law for me, Mr. Dershowitz? I can’t wait to see it! Better yet, get it to Flynn’s counsel ASAP. They need you! Is that where you came up with the “case record” phrase? That one was rich!

Flynn admitted it! Outstanding!

Hoax. Flynn lied. Then he admitted his lie was criminal. Then he got cold feet and decided he didn’t want to go to the can. And then, after the career prosecutor bailed on the case in what almost certainly was a protest, a political appointee tried to have the government abandon the prosecution. But the problem that none of those geniuses considered was that the government needs the permission of the court to do so! Oops! Nitpicking Mr. Gleeson’s submission doesn’t change any of those truths. Sad! Most likely because you have a lousy education, cling to Trump as a sliver of self worth, and generally have no clue what you’re talking about in the legal and political arenas.

FYI - calling the submission nonsense a bunch of times doesn’t actually make it nonsense. Also, have you considered consulting on this case? The General needs you. Only your brilliance can rescue this matter from the jaws of injustice. Certainly he would appreciate your expertise! Great stuff! I wasted 30 seconds of my life reading a case about a DPA and a speedy trial concern before wondering how that might possibly be relevant where, as here, the government seeks to abandon a prosecution that already has resulted in a conviction. Only your brilliant legal mind can explain this one to me!

Maybe you can also enlighten me on some of the “case law” on which you rely. Can’t wait!

Yuppers. Everyone else is wrong but you. That guilty plea? Flynn was just joking. Only kidding around. Did it for fun because he was playing Trumpian 4D chess and thought it would work out to his advantage in a way that only clairvoyants like this Psycho Rhino guy can see. That’s the ticket! Fake logic. Even assuming that I hadn’t read any submission at the time what you characterize as the prior representations were made, I have not indicated that I did not engage in any such reading in the period between the time at which those representations were made and the present. And, in point of fact, I read part of the a memorandum previously submitted (and, ostensibly filed). Section C3, 1; Washed up Psycho Rhino, 0. Nice dodge, brochacho. Any chance you can educate me on how today’s submission is “baseless” and “contradicted” by the “case record?”

You called the submission baseless and contradicted by, among other things, the “case record.” (A phrase that I read for the first time just now, for what it’s worth.) Prove it, big boy!

I read the first 39 pages. This brief is an effin takedown so far. I do this for a living, and to this point in the submission I’m impressed.

Look at harbor center or whatever that thing is in Buffalo. Great for the city. Dead zone for retail. I can’t imagine the pegulas look at that and think doing the same with football would be a good plan. now, if the new stadium would double as a convention center, or potentially house the Sabres, and had hospitality spinoff possibilities, that might work. But at this point we probably won’t know for two years whether 65,000 people can safely gather for a football game, or if the appetite for such gatherings will be there. So the money here is on short term extension in OP, and on ultimately refurbishing OP.

I’m sure patriot place has a nice roster of shops. My stock portfolio also looks pretty nice because I’m overweight on Amazon and don’t have REITs or dinosaurs like Kohl’s, Macy’s, and JCPenney.

Dave Petraeus has a great piece yesterday about renaming military institutions that honor Confederates. It’s a must-read. I don’t believe in melting history - the statue should be preserved somewhere because it is part of the (darker side) of the story of America. But the time to stop glorifying those who supported the original sin of this country has long since passed.

Fake Christian b-man complaining about someone promulgating BS. Pot meet kettle.

Retail is dead.

What about an animal that is even meaner than a lion? Like a griffin. Or an enraged panda. That might work better.

Fake news. We need to discuss this issue in its own thread. In fact, I may start a new thread for the purpose of discussing this important question. Tell me about it. It’s like him making fun of someone’s tiny baby hands. Ironic and sad!

Trump v criminal cabal? Is there a civil war in the alt-wrong community?