SectionC3

Who's leeching? It's broadcast over the air and on premium channels for which I pay. That's leeching? Give me a break. (And I happened to purchase no fewer than four PSLs at the new stadium, so while we're on the subject of leeching maybe you can show some cards in that respect.)

That's really what we're talking about here. Taste, or poor taste, depending on one's perspective. That's it. Have the yacht, don't have the yacht, whatever. I think it's in poor taste to take $850m in taxpayer subsidy to fund a business and to then turn around and buy a $100m yacht. Others feel differently, and they're entitled to that opinion for many valid reasons. That about sums the whole thing up. All of this is well said. I'm not mad at the guy. I appreciate that he invested the money here and kept the team here. But I'm mindful of the fact that it's an immensely profitable business, and I personally would not have taken gobs of taxpayer money and then bought a yacht. It's not how I work. The question is taste, and look, and it's not for me. And some others. But there are more who don't really care about the optics or who don't see it the same way. Whatevs.

You have to be kidding.

I don’t disagree with the thought that he likes to send the children of others to war. But wasn’t he around in Trump I? And it’s not like his views have evolved or changed since then. So it does make this “raid” seem a bit like a distraction and persecution.

Mostly because if I was going to take $250m from the county containing the poorest city in America it’s not something I would do. I don’t blame the state and county for paying for the stadium. I would have done the same. I also think it’s a bad look to take those funds and spend $100m on a friggin stupid opulent boat. It’s not something I would have done. You have your opinion, I have mine. It is what it is. On to the next issue.

Tell that to my tenants who are scraping by and could use a slice of that $600m. Look, I would have voted for the stadium monies, too. I get why Terry asked, and I get why the state paid. It’s still not a good look to get $600m in tax monies and then build a $100m boat. We agree to disagree.

I disagree. It's a terrible look. I support the stadium monies--as a community, we had to do it. But this looks awful, and tone deaf.

Maybe go into SE if you’re spending the money anyways. Try that.

Such a response should be expected from someone now protecting “Hilly!” Well done, MAGA!

Good news, and just like March.

That is not good news.

Thanks to Ingram’s great play/uncalled DPI.

If you’re still talking about Joe Biden, then you’ve lost the plot. Like JDHillyFan.

Like the cats and dogs thing? Not to mention the area with the most crime—southeast across the river—is untouched by the feds. Another imaginary emergency created by the Don.

More context. He’s an emotional guy protective of his health. He bawled (not picking on him) when he tore his ACL. Took a full year to feel comfortable after the ACL injury. Threw his helmet pretty far when he tore his Achilles. This? Not the same reaction. And it would be malpractice not to cart him over to the field house if they were in the stadium. So, … fingers crossed.

Samuel and Cook.

What’s the latest conspiracy theory about Obama? I haven’t been on 4chan like, ever, so I’m not current on such matters.

Maybe you and your MAGA pals can J6 those things and unveil the conspiracy. After all, the new theory seems to be that the Clintons are prominently mentioned therein. So how come you’re now protecting “Hilly?”

At least they won't cover up the Epstein files.

I thought Republicans were interested in the release of the Epstein files. What a hoax that was.

Like what? The "severe consequences" that haven't materialized? That's the best you have? No exoneration. Legally sufficient evidence of an obstruction crime. But Trump appointee Bill Barr killing it after reading the report for a few minutes. And you invent some nonsense to explain it away.

So the aggressor gets bogged down in a stalemate and the victim loses territory? If that’s what Ukraine wants, then fine. Otherwise it seems to me that America First entails such things as addressing inflation and the job market and not sticking our beaks in to help Russia. But hey, the Don wants a Nobel, so he’s going to tinker with this for a few weeks before it goes the way of Greenland, MAGAZA, and state #51.

He should be. I don’t care that he won’t be here. 71 ending up on his back was embarrassing. Two consecutive false starts by your swing tackle shoes lack of attention to detail. 44 looking like a fish out of water when not playing downhill was painful. No rhythm from the QBs. McD is going to make them work this week in practice. Let’s see if they resist the urged to call washed up old friend Jordan Poyer given the friggin disaster that is the safety room. The Gabe Davis news tells me McD is done with a WR4 who can’t get on the field. Samuel is in deep trouble.

One of those tweets sounds an awful lot like trump. Inflation, feuding, child exploitation. Bolivia might be perfect for you guys once this trash is out of the White House.

Hoax. You guys covered that up by killing the investigation, just like you covered up Epstein. Didn’t like the conclusion of the investigators? Kill it, and then lie about exoneration or whatever the tall tale there is and blame Biden or Big Bird or the boogeyman of the day. It’s a shame that the truth is so elusive for MAGA. But Putin wants to make a deal for him! I’d think it was a better expenditure of time if our negotiator didn’t cave (ceasefire? Serious consequences?) and knew in what country the summit was being held. In the meantime, lots of inflation, little consumer confidence, and no Epstein files. But Putin first!