SectionC3

More context. He’s an emotional guy protective of his health. He bawled (not picking on him) when he tore his ACL. Took a full year to feel comfortable after the ACL injury. Threw his helmet pretty far when he tore his Achilles. This? Not the same reaction. And it would be malpractice not to cart him over to the field house if they were in the stadium. So, … fingers crossed.

Samuel and Cook.

What’s the latest conspiracy theory about Obama? I haven’t been on 4chan like, ever, so I’m not current on such matters.

Maybe you and your MAGA pals can J6 those things and unveil the conspiracy. After all, the new theory seems to be that the Clintons are prominently mentioned therein. So how come you’re now protecting “Hilly?”

At least they won't cover up the Epstein files.

I thought Republicans were interested in the release of the Epstein files. What a hoax that was.

Like what? The "severe consequences" that haven't materialized? That's the best you have? No exoneration. Legally sufficient evidence of an obstruction crime. But Trump appointee Bill Barr killing it after reading the report for a few minutes. And you invent some nonsense to explain it away.

So the aggressor gets bogged down in a stalemate and the victim loses territory? If that’s what Ukraine wants, then fine. Otherwise it seems to me that America First entails such things as addressing inflation and the job market and not sticking our beaks in to help Russia. But hey, the Don wants a Nobel, so he’s going to tinker with this for a few weeks before it goes the way of Greenland, MAGAZA, and state #51.

He should be. I don’t care that he won’t be here. 71 ending up on his back was embarrassing. Two consecutive false starts by your swing tackle shoes lack of attention to detail. 44 looking like a fish out of water when not playing downhill was painful. No rhythm from the QBs. McD is going to make them work this week in practice. Let’s see if they resist the urged to call washed up old friend Jordan Poyer given the friggin disaster that is the safety room. The Gabe Davis news tells me McD is done with a WR4 who can’t get on the field. Samuel is in deep trouble.

One of those tweets sounds an awful lot like trump. Inflation, feuding, child exploitation. Bolivia might be perfect for you guys once this trash is out of the White House.

Hoax. You guys covered that up by killing the investigation, just like you covered up Epstein. Didn’t like the conclusion of the investigators? Kill it, and then lie about exoneration or whatever the tall tale there is and blame Biden or Big Bird or the boogeyman of the day. It’s a shame that the truth is so elusive for MAGA. But Putin wants to make a deal for him! I’d think it was a better expenditure of time if our negotiator didn’t cave (ceasefire? Serious consequences?) and knew in what country the summit was being held. In the meantime, lots of inflation, little consumer confidence, and no Epstein files. But Putin first!

Joe A. didn't exactly help him out, but I'm not sure that Joe A. wasn't supposed to follow the eyes there.

My *ss. Barr had the case for about five minutes. He's a political appointee of the guy he declined to prosecute. By contrast, the guy who had it for months and had a team of investigators reached the conclusion that you just can't acknowledge. No exoneration, and legally sufficient evidence of an obstruction crime. And yet Barr wouldn't take it to a grand jury and let the grand jury and the courts decide. There's the painful flaw - even if Barr felt differently, he didn't spend the time with it, and didn't let a trier of fact (eventually) decide. Oh I'm great. A little sympathetic toward you, though. Your constant state of delusion and obsession is kind of sad.

I thought Walker was OK, but otherwise I agree with you. Jackson, especially, looks rough.

What's your point? Other than your usual deflections because you and the rest of the Trump sycophants are out of your depth. But Biden did something wrong! And Bill Barr looked at the Mueller report for as long as it takes to snap a deuce and decided not to pursue it! So Trump definitely never ever did something wrong! And he definitely doesn't have dementia, even though he thought Alaska was part of Russia! Puh-leeze. You guys spend so much time defending his BS that you forget about inflation, the Epstein files, the declining job market, and the crappy consumer confidence. The forest has been lost through the trees.

You're way out of your depth and, in this instance, you have even less knowledge of what you're talking about. The Mueller report was blunt: no exoneration, and legally sufficient evidence to proceed. Done and done. The guy who spent months looking at the evidence refused to conclude that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish an obstruction crime. Quite the contrary. Unlike you and the rest of the Trump sycophants on this board, I actually know what I'm talking about. Nobody is above the law. And Mueller refused to exonerate, and similarly refused to conclude that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish a crime of obstruction. What's your point? Somebody else did something wrong, so Trump's sin is excused? Dumb, even for you. And, besides, unless there's a statute of limitations that I'm not aware of, there's nothing that says that the Trump AG's office couldn't prosecute now. So go for it. Call Pam, or better yet go to law school, take the bar, go to work for Pam, and take the case. You got this! One could say the same about the current occupant of the White House. He thought the friggin summit was in Russia.

Disgusting. If Putin wants to save lives, then all he has to do is leave Ukraine. It's so simple. And, so much for those "severe consequences." What a joke.

I was thinking VDM trade - maybe even to the Bears depending on how they see him in practice -- but the Grable concussion spooks me a bit. I'd rather hold VDM a little too long and deal with too many tackles on the roster until Van Pran is ready than risk running Chase Lundt out there if Grable isn't ready and there's a week 1 injury. At the very least Anderson would have to tape his hands differently if he's the backup center. (Or retape quickly if he had to go in.) Hawes might fit that "heavy" bill pretty well in those sets.

I think they do. His body type - there's some guys you can just tell are NFL players before they hit it big. Benford, to me, was a guy I saw in the stadium during his first pre-season game and was thinking who is this guy. He just looks like an NFL player. Grable is that guy, too. He stands out. He's going to be a stud, so they may kick him in if need be. (I sat pretty far away for camp, blue and red, and the pre-season game, but from a distance Dorian Strong might fit that bill this year. He just looked like an NFL type at his position.)

PUP solves a problem, and they can probably get by at IOL for a bit with Anderson as the primary backup at all three IOL positions and Lundt kicking in. The Grable concussion complicates things a bit.

Exactly what I said. There is legally sufficient evidence to establish a charge of obstruction of justice under whatever part of the USC is applicable here. Enough, as a threshold matter, to indict and enough, were this evidence adduced following a trial, to convict. It's not a hoax, it's not political, it's the truth. There's meaningful evidence your boy committed an obstruction crime around, such that he could not be exonerated and such that he could have been indicted (had Barr not squelched it to protect him). You can say hoax this or political that, but the truth is the truth. Any lawyer who does this stuff knows exactly what was communicated, and Twitter goofs like you spout off without having a clue what they're talking about in this area. Collusion efforts weren't "fake," and even if they were (which, again, they were not), he still can't obstruct the investigation. The law is the law, and even the President is not above it. Until now, apparently. Give me a break. It's way too sophisticated for that. Low information voters don't have a clue what that means. They're as clueless as you are in this area. Which maybe makes you a low information voter.

Hoax. He forgot more about law than you'll ever know. And, any lawyer who does even a little bit of work in the area knows exactly what Mueller was saying. There is legally sufficient evidence that Trump committed obstruction of justice. You can stick your head in the sand or come up with whatever warped Twitter view you want, but the reality of those words is inescapable.

What does this mean to you? "At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." What sham are you talking about? The stupid summit, or Ukranians fighting for freedom and self-determination?

I'll give it a little time. I think the idea was a dumb one, and the theater is ridiculous, but I acknowledge that he probably received some sort of information from Putin (in the form of terms that will be patently unacceptable to Ukraine) that he'll convey to Zelenskyy. Knowing how Trump operates, he'll be coy with the info with Zelenskyy now, bring the guy to the Oval next week, and try to bully him into accepting a lousy deal. Zelenskyy will say no, Trump will stomp his feet, and away we go. I'm not against the idea of talking, but the framework is all wrong. Russia cannot be rewarded for aggression. It might get something it wants (no sanctions, etc.) for leaving, but it cannot be rewarded for aggression.

And you have inside info? Seems to me the intelligence estimates were not so rosy. And how did Israel get there? Boots on the ground, in part. That free pass likely won’t be there if they have or want to go in again.