phypon

You might see Carson Wentz in the area next...

Serious question. Didn't McD and Daboll butt heads too? What other staff members has McD butted heads with? Is there a pattern here? Again, serious question.

<youtube>

The Bills need to get rid of Marty Schot....er, I mean McD...

So who do we get as a new OC to start the season? Who's available? Hey, it's happened before...

McD is the greatest coach ever! He'll get this sorted out Hope it's not some type of injury for Diggs.

Apparently, Augie needs to know the down and distance, how many timeouts are left, what month it is, what is the temperature and climate conditions, what year it is... Getting that answer from him reminds me of trying to get a yes or no answer out of a politician on a MSM infotainment show.

Anyone else want to go out and buy an 82' Buick Century, a chainsaw, and some Big Red gum after watching that?

He's not completely wrong. This D has been a sieve at stopping the run during the wrong games, so the D line has required attention. As other's have stated, they've been trying to improve the O line. As long as they are addressing both lines, I'm good that they are aware of the need. If the D line is improved this year and the O line needs more help, maybe they go heavy next year for the O line. As much as we don't want to see Allen hit the dirt, he does mask O line issues. I'd love to have a great O line. Hopefully, this year's line is better and they can throw more resources at it next year and the year after if need be.

That's an much better title!

Unless you are physically unable to, work on the deck yourself. It's a deck, not building a skyscraper here.

Oh I'm sure you got braised for that one

Who remembers the big block Fred Jackson laid on him that bruised half of his body? Action Jackson was the man!

Stop being such a sauerkraut.

I would say it was a kosher response.

We should have took a safety instead /s.

Well, what's the other evidence in the case then? What is the other bad **** that possibly happened to this woman later in the night after the falsified gang stuff? I mean, counting the gang stuff she's already up to having sex with four people in one night. I haven't read anything about another sexual encounter after the gang stuff. The video evidence of the gang stuff seems to prove that it was consensual. Maybe I'm missing something.

“In looking at the videos on the sex tape, I absolutely cannot prove any forceable sexual assault based upon what happened,” Amador said. “I don’t see any elements of force being used in the sexual encounter,” Amador said. https://sports.yahoo.com/prosecutors-former-bills-punter-matt-araiza-wasnt-present-during-alleged-gang-rape-225211550.html Booth of those quotes are from the above link, which was the first Yahoo link I read. I thought the yahoo news was a reprint of the yahoo sports and I confused the links. I found the other links that contained other information about MA not being there at the time of the alleged gang activities as well as other quotes from the DA. There is a pretty good amount of evidence being presented in all of those links. I don't know how much more evidence you need in order to see that the girl lied and was not raped. I also don't know why you don't understand the evidence and can't seem to accept the fact that she lied.

“I don’t see any elements of force being used in the sexual encounter,” Amador said. https://news.yahoo.com/araiza-not-present-time-alleged-215711086.html https://abcnews.go.com/Sports/witness-matt-araiza-present-time-alleged-rape/story?id=99204260 https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/05/09/prosecutor-matt-araiza-not-present-during-alleged-gang-rape

The DA and t The DA and prosecutors said so. That's how. That was their statement. The DA saw the videos and made a statement. You have been proved wrong.

The video that the DA saw actually does exonerate the accused (which is not even MA). What is wrong with you? Do you want this young woman to be raped so you can say you were right about your initial opinion? It sure seems that some posters want that. The evidence is there. The chick lied. With all of the horridness of this situation there is a silver lining, a young woman was not raped. That's a big, big win here. Stop trying to say "but, but, but...she still could have been raped". She wasn't. She lied.

“Prosecutors said the footage from the cell phone of the sexual encounters did not suggest any forced behavior. “There’s nothing in the videos that sound like you’re saying ‘stop’ or ‘this hurts’ or anything like that,” Ted Mansour, an investigator for the San Diego County district attorney’s office, said at the meeting. Prosecutors also said that videos from the bedroom show that her piercings were not ripped at the time and she was not bleeding from any wounds from it. “I don’t see any elements of force being used in the sexual encounters,” Assistant District Attorney Amador said.” I don't know how this isn't clear to you. The actual prosecutors that saw the video from the alleged gang activity have said there was no indication of her claims. Based on the video they saw of that specific incident there is no evidence that she ever said "no". It doesn't get anymore cut and dry then that. The actual prosecutors have said this.

They are referring to that night specifically.

The information you are looking for is literally in the post you quoted.

Didn't Rich Eisen do a pretty scathing hit piece on MA? I'm pretty sure it was him. I doubt he will apologize for jumping to conclusions...