Gene Frenkle

Limbaugh: I Hope Obama Fails So is this just Rush spewing crap to further incense his retarded listeners or is he really so blinded by his own partisanship, enormous personal bankroll and ego that he thinks it's OK for America to lie on the mat for another four years? Actually, who cares - I just don't see how anybody can truthfully buy into the hypocritical sh-- that this guys spews on a daily basis. I admit that I listen to him from time to time for the entertainment value, but I also know that some here are devoted listeners who mostly treat his word as gospel. A tiger truly can't change his stripes.

Not to rain on your irrational fear-mongering parade, but... http://www.reason.com/news/show/36765.html It's disturbing how little critical thought naturally occurs in the human brain.

There is no hell. There's no Tooth Fairy either.

Compassionate Conservatism Peace be with you.

Hey now, Reagan is off limits - a demigod in the conservative movement. Show some respect. Now back to that black guy...

Could you imagine Bush trying to say the word extemporaneously?

The anger is getting thicker and thicker the closer we get to Tuesday. Obama stuttering every word out of his mouth from here to eternity is still an upgrade.

Youthful enthusiasm has no place in politics!

All religions were started by someone who was real at some point in time, but you know that. Anyway, all this crap equating Obama's popularity to religion, cultism, etc is just stupid. Any level of presidential popularity would seem extreme compared to a demonized figure like George Bush. Some people are rooting for him as if he were a sports team, but that's nothing new in politics. Black people are understandably excited because he's the first black president. Bush haters like myself might be a bit over the top, but that's more about Bush leaving than anything else. All this religion talk is just sour grapes.

Just for the sake of argument, I fail to see how a Barack Obama based religion is any less ridiculous or valid than any other B.S. religion you can name.

I know that Scientologists do not believe in treating mental disorders (see Tom Cruise's past rants against postpartum depression). I don't claim to know their specific views on autism, but I'm sure that it would not be too difficult to find out. I just read an article on Scientific American's website: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=what-i...wasaki-syndrome It seems that they tried at least one anti-seizure medication and I wouldn't want to presume that more could have been done, though it doesn't sound like all avenues of seizure prevention were explored.

You're getting less and less coherent all the time.

I think you mean party's, party is or parties are - possibly parties're, but that's probably making up a new word. Either way, grammar correction lends at least as much value as your same old drivel.

I'm sure it's WAY too early for this, but did his Scientology beliefs prevent him from getting proper treatment for his autistic son?

sh--, if this is what you're complaining about, then so far so good. Make sure to keep your eyes and ears open for the next major scandal!

And if not, just move to Wasilla.

Looked like a little Thurman Thomas at times tonight.

Yes, that was a great moment for everyone.

Better than meth...

http://sockandawe.com/ Awesome

I (along with my season ticket) will be at the Sundowner for the Bills/NE game.

If only everyone had your clear vision and ability to be right in every situation. It's funny that you both misspelled aren't and questioned someone else's intelligence in the same sentence.

As long as we're bringing up old sh-- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whpbRR7Dzms

There's no substitute for crappy pop science and "it doesn't make sense to me so it can't be true" when talking to someone with a preferred notion they are trying like hell to support over and over again. OF COURSE they know more about the intricacies of this than all of those so-called liberal "climate scientists". I love the "Earth goes in cycles argument". It's just like answering every undesirable scientific fact with "God did it". You can't really say anything about it because, well, the Earth has had warming and cooling cycles. What deniers can't explain is what exactly is causing the Earth's current trend towards a warming cycle now. While science has explained many of the warming and cooling cycles in the Earth's past, there are no factors (other than man) that explain what has been happening over the past 30 years or so. Past factors include solar variations, volcanoes and Milankovitch cycles (changes in the Earth's orbit). None of these things are in play now. What they willfully ignore is that CO2, a greenhouse gas, is 35% more prevalent in the atmosphere than it was 30 years ago. Greenhouse gasses cause more heat from the sun to be retained. More retained heat causes higher temperatures over time. Higher temperatures cause the freaking glaciers to melt, the seas to rise, the oceans to desalinate and the Earth to warm. There is an increase in CO2 that is indisputable. We are causing it and your denial does not make it otherwise. But as always, whatever makes you feel better...